Skip to main content
Log in

Relationship between cervical sagittal alignment and quality of life in ankylosing spondylitis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Little information is available on the relationship between cervical sagittal alignment and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients. The aim of this study was to identify relationships between cervical sagittal alignment and HRQOL in AS.

Methods

The study and control groups comprised 102 AS patients (15 women and 87 men) and age- and sex-matched 50 controls, respectively. All underwent anteroposterior and lateral radiographs and completed clinical questionnaires. The radiographic parameters examined were C2–C7 lordosis, C2–C7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA), T1 slope and T1 slope minus C2–C7 lordosis (TS-CL). A visual analogue scale (VAS 0–10) score for neck pain, the neck disability index (NDI), neck pain and disability (NPAD) scale and bath ankylosing spondylitis disease activity index (BASDAI) were administered to evaluate QOL. Statistical analysis was performed to determine the significances of differences between the study and control groups. In addition, correlations between radiological parameters and clinical questionnaires were sought.

Results

AS patients and controls were found to be different significantly in terms of C2–C7 SVA, T1 slope, and TS-CL. However, no significant intergroup difference was observed for C2–C7 lordosis (P > 0.05). Correlation analysis revealed significant relationships between radiographic parameters and QOL. Multiple regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of QOL, and the results obtained revealed that C2–C7 SVA significantly predicted VAS, NDI, and NPAD scores and that age predicted NPAD score.

Conclusions

Cervical sagittal parameters were found to be significantly different in AS patients and normal controls. Correlation analysis revealed significant relationships between radiographic parameters and QOL. In particular, C2–C7 SVA was found to be a significant predictor of QOL in AS patient.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Belanger TA, Milam RA 4th, Roh JS, Bohlman HH (2005) Cervicothoracic extension osteotomy for chin-on-chest deformity in ankylosing spondylitis. J Bone Jt Surg Am 87:1732–1738

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Boulay C, Tardieu C, Hecquet J, Benaim C, Mouilleseaux B, Marty C, Prat-Pradal D, Legaye J, Duval-Beaupère G, Pélissier J (2006) Sagittal alignment of spine and pelvis regulated by pelvic incidence: standard values and prediction of lordosis. Eur Spine J 15:415–422

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Calin A, Garrett S, Whitelock H, Kennedy LG, O’Hea J, Mallorie P, Jenkinson T (1994) A new approach to defining functional ability in ankylosing spondylitis: the development of the bath ankylosing spondylitis functional index. J Rheumatol 21:2281–2285

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Debarge R, Demey G, Roussouly P (2010) Radiological analysis of ankylosing spondylitis patients with severe kyphosis before and after pedicle subtraction osteotomy. Eur Spine J 19:65–70

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Etame AB, Than KD, Wang AC, La Marca F, Park P (2008) Surgical management of symptomatic cervical or cervicothoracic kyphosis due to ankylosing spondylitis. Spine 33:E559–E564

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Faldini C, Pagkrati S, Leonetti D, Miscione MT, Giannini S (2011) Sagittal segmental alignment as predictor of adjacent-level degeneration after a cloward procedure. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469:674–681

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hardacker JW, Shuford RF, Capicotto PN, Pryor PW (1997) Radiographic standing cervical segmental alignment in adult volunteers without neck symptoms. Spine 22:1472–1480

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hoh DJ, Khoueir P, Wang MY (2008) Management of cervical deformity in ankylosing spondylitis. Neurosurg Focus 24:E9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Katsuura A, Kukuda S, Saruhashi Y, Mori K (2001) Kyphotic malalignment after anterior cervical fusion is one of the factors promoting the degenerative process in adjacent intervertebral levels. Eur Spine J 10:320–324

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Knott PT, Mardjetko SM, Techy F (2010) The use of the T1 sagittal angle in predicting overall sagittal balance of the spine. Spine J 10:994–998

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kuntz C 4th, Levin LS, Ondra SL, Shaffrey CI, Morgan CJ (2007) Neutral upright sagittal spinal alignment from the occiput to the pelvis in asymptomatic adults: a review and resynthesis of the literature. J Neurosurg Spine 6:104–112

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lee JS, Suh KT, Kim JI, Lee HS, Goh TS (2013) Validation of the Korean version of the neck pain and disability scale. Asian Spine J 7:178–183

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. McMaster MJ (1997) Osteotomy of the cervical spine in ankylosing spondylitis. J Bone Jt Surg Br 79:197–203

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Mehdian SM, Boreham B, Hammett T (2012) Cervical osteotomy in ankylosing spondylitis. Eur Spine J 21:2713–2717

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Park MS, Kelly MP, Lee DH, Min WK, Rahman RK, Riew KD (2013) Sagittal alignment as a predictor of clinical adjacent segment pathology requiring surgery after anterior cervical arthrodesis. Spine J (in press)

  16. Shin JK, Lee JS, Goh TS, Son SM (2014) Correlation between clinical outcome and spinopelvic parameters in ankylosing spondylitis. Eur Spine J 23:242–247

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Song JS, Choi BW, Song KJ (2013) Risk factors for the development of adjacent segment disease following anterior cervical arthrodesis for degenerative cervical disease: Comparison between fusion methods. J Clin Neurosci (in press)

  18. Song KJ, Choi BW, Choi BR, Seo GB (2010) Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Korean version of the neck disability index. Spine 20:E1045–E1049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. van der Linden S, Valkenburg HA, Cats A (1984) Evaluation of diagnostic criteria for ankylosing spondylitis. A proposal for modification of the New York criteria. Arthritis Rheum 27:361–368

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. White AA 3rd, Panjabi MM, Thomas CL (1977) The clinical biomechanics of kyphotic deformities. Clin Orthop Relat Res 128:8–17

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Zochling J, van der Heijde D, Burgos-Vargas R, Collantes E, Davis JC Jr, Dijkmans B, Dougados M, Géher P, Inman RD, Khan MA, Kvien TK, Leirisalo-Repo M, Olivieri I, Pavelka K, Sieper J, Stucki G, Sturrock RD, van der Linden S, Wendling D, Böhm H, van Royen BJ, Braun J (2006) ASAS/EULAR recommendations for the management of ankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis 65:442–452

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jung Sub Lee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, J.S., Youn, M.S., Shin, J.K. et al. Relationship between cervical sagittal alignment and quality of life in ankylosing spondylitis. Eur Spine J 24, 1199–1203 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3491-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3491-8

Keywords

Navigation