Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Anterior versus posterior approach for treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures: a meta-analysis

  • Review
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To critically review and summarize the literature comparing the results of surgery via an anterior approach and that via a posterior approach for the treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures to identify the better approach.

Methods

In this meta-analysis, we conducted electronic searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and other databases using the search terms “thoracolumbar fractures”, “anterior”, “posterior”, “controlled clinical trials”. Relevant journals or conference proceedings were also searched manually. Data extraction and quality assessment were in accordance with Cochrane Collaboration guidelines. The analysis was performed on individual patient data from all the trials that met the selection criteria. Sensitivity analysis was performed when there was significant heterogeneity. Results were expressed as risk difference for dichotomous outcomes and mean difference for continuous outcomes with 95 % confidence interval.

Results

Four randomized clinical trials and three controlled clinical trials comparing the results of the anterior versus posterior approach in the treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures were retrieved; these studies included 179 and 152 patients in the anterior and posterior approach groups, respectively. There were no differences in terms of neurological recovery, return to work, complications and Cobb angle between the two groups. The anterior approach was associated with longer operative time, greater blood loss and higher cost than the posterior approach.

Conclusions

The posterior approach may be more effective than the anterior approach. However, more high-quality, randomized controlled trials are required to compare these approaches and guide clinical decision-making.

Level of Evidence Level II, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of level of evidence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Muller U, Berlemann U, Sledge J, Schwarzenbach O (1999) Treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures without neurologic deficit by indirect reduction and posterior instrumentation: bisegmental stabilization with monosegmental fusion. Eur Spine J 8(4):284–289

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Magerl F, Aebi M, Gertzbein SD, Harms J, Nazarian S (1994) A comprehensive classification of thoracic and lumbar injuries. Eur Spine J 3(4):184–201

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Oner FC, Ramos LM, Simmermacher RK, Kingma PT, Diekerhof CH, Dhert WJ, Verbout AJ (2002) Classification of thoracic and lumbar spine fractures: problems of reproducibility. A study of 53 patients using CT and MRI. Eur Spine J 11(3):235–245

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Petersilge CA, Emery SE (1996) Thoracolumbar burst fracture: evaluating stability. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 17(2):105–113

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cho WS, Chung CK, Jahng TA, Kim HJ (2008) Post-laminectomy kyphosis in patients with cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: does it cause neurological deterioration? J Korean Neurosurg Soc 43(6):259–264

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Dai LY, Jiang LS, Jiang SD (2008) Conservative treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures: a long-term follow-up results with special reference to the load sharing classification. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33(23):2536–2544

    Google Scholar 

  7. Post RB, van der Sluis CK, Leferink VJ, Ten DH (2009) Long-term functional outcome after type A3 spinal fractures: operative versus non-operative treatment. Acta Orthop Belgica 75(3):389–395

    Google Scholar 

  8. Thomas KC, Bailey CS, Dvorak MF, Kwon B, Fisher C (2006) Comparison of operative and nonoperative treatment for thoracolumbar burst fractures in patients without neurological deficit: a systematic review. J Neurosurg Spine 4(5):351–358

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Heary RF, Salas S, Bono CM, Kumar S (2006) Complication avoidance: thoracolumbar and lumbar burst fractures. Neurosurg Clin N Am 17(3):377–388

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kim HS, Lee SY, Nanda A, Kim JY, Park JO, Moon SH, Lee HM, Kim HJ, Wei H, Moon ES (2009) Comparison of surgical outcomes in thoracolumbar fractures operated with posterior constructs having varying fixation length with selective anterior fusion. Yonsei Med J 50(4):546–554

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cresswell TR, Marshall PD, Smith RB (1998) Mechanical stability of the AO internal spinal fixation system compared with that of the Hartshill rectangle and sublaminar wiring in the management of unstable burst fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 23(1):111–115

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Parker JW, Lane JR, Karaikovic EE, Gaines RW (2000) Successful short-segment instrumentation and fusion for thoracolumbar spine fractures: a consecutive 41/2-year series. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25(9):1157–1170

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Sjostrom L, Karlstrom G, Pech P, Rauschning W (1996) Indirect spinal canal decompression in burst fractures treated with pedicle screw instrumentation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 21(1):113–123

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Carl AL, Tranmer BI, Sachs BL (1997) Anterolateral dynamized instrumentation and fusion for unstable thoracolumbar and lumbar burst fractures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 22(6):686–690

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Dai LY, Jiang LS, Jiang SD (2009) Anterior-only stabilization using plating with bone structural autograft versus titanium mesh cages for two- or three-column thoracolumbar burst fractures: a prospective randomized study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34(14):1429–1435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kaneda K, Taneichi H, Abumi K, Hashimoto T, Satoh S, Fujiya M (1997) Anterior decompression and stabilization with the Kaneda device for thoracolumbar burst fractures associated with neurological deficits. J Bone Joint Surg Am 79(1):69–83

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Dai LY, Jiang SD, Wang XY, Jiang LS (2007) A review of the management of thoracolumbar burst fractures. Surg Neurol 67(3):221–231

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tasdemiroglu E, Tibbs PA (1995) Long-term follow-up results of thoracolumbar fractures after posterior instrumentation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 20(15):1704–1708

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Verlaan JJ, Diekerhof CH, Buskens E, van der Tweel I, Verbout AJ, Dhert WJ, Oner FC (2004) Surgical treatment of traumatic fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine: a systematic review of the literature on techniques, complications, and outcome. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 29(7):803–814

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Handoll HH, Gillespie WJ, Gillespie LD, Madhok R (2008) The Cochrane Collaboration: a leading role in producing reliable evidence to inform healthcare decisions in musculoskeletal trauma and disorders. Indian J Orthop 42(3):247–251

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG (2003) Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 327(7414):557–560

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lau J, Ioannidis JP, Schmid CH (1997) Quantitative synthesis in systematic reviews. Ann Intern Med 127(9):820–826

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Esses SI, Botsford DJ, Kostuik JP (1990) Evaluation of surgical treatment for burst fractures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 15(7):667–673

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Danisa OA, Shaffrey CI, Jane JA, Whitehill R, Wang GJ, Szabo TA, Hansen CA, Shaffrey ME, Chan DP (1995) Surgical approaches for the correction of unstable thoracolumbar burst fractures: a retrospective analysis of treatment outcomes. J Neurosurg 83(6):977–983

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Stancic MF, Gregorovic E, Nozica E, Penezic L (2001) Anterior decompression and fixation versus posterior reposition and semirigid fixation in the treatment of unstable burst thoracolumbar fracture: prospective clinical trial. Croat Med J 42(1):49–53

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Wood KB, Bohn D, Mehbod A (2005) Anterior versus posterior treatment of stable thoracolumbar burst fractures without neurologic deficit: a prospective, randomized study. J Spinal Disord Tech 18(Suppl):S15–S23

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hitchon PW, Torner J, Eichholz KM, Beeler SN (2006) Comparison of anterolateral and posterior approaches in the management of thoracolumbar burst fractures. J Neurosurg Spine 5(2):117–125

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Sasso RC, Renkens K, Hanson D, Reilly T, McGuire RJ, Best NM (2006) Unstable thoracolumbar burst fractures: anterior-only versus short-segment posterior fixation. J Spinal Disord Tech 19(4):242–248

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Lin B, Chen ZW, Guo ZM, Liu H, Yi ZK (2011) Anterior approach versus posterior approach with subtotal corpectomy, decompression, and reconstruction of spine in the treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures: a prospective randomized controlled study. J Spinal Disord Tech. doi:10.1097/BSD.0b013e3182204c53

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Falavigna A, Righesso NO, Polesso MA, Franceschini PR (2007) Anterior approach in patients with traumatic compression fracture type of thoracolumbar spine (T11–L2). Arq Neuropsiquiatr 65(3B):906–911

    Google Scholar 

  31. Kuner EH, Kuner A, Schlickewei W, Mullaji AB (1994) Ligamentotaxis with an internal spinal fixator for thoracolumbar fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br 76(1):107–112

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Ha KI, Han SH, Chung M, Yang BK, Youn GH (1996) A clinical study of the natural remodeling of burst fractures of the lumbar spine. Clin Orthop Relat Res 323:210–214

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Allain J (2011) Anterior spine surgery in recent thoracolumbar fractures: an update. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 97(5):541–554

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Scapinelli R, Candiotto S (1995) Spontaneous remodeling of the spinal canal after burst fractures of the low thoracic and lumbar region. J Spinal Disord 8(6):486–493

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Shi R, Liu H, Zhao X, Liu X, Gong Q, Li T, Liu L, Zeng J, Song Y (2011) Anterior single segmental decompression and fixation for Denis B type thoracolumbar burst fracture with neurological deficiency: thirty-four cases with average twenty-six month follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36(9):E598–E605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Dai LY, Wang XY, Jiang LS (2007) Neurologic recovery from thoracolumbar burst fractures: is it predicted by the amount of initial canal encroachment and kyphotic deformity? Surg Neurol 67(3):232–237, 238

    Google Scholar 

  37. Tropiano P, Huang RC, Louis CA, Poitout DG, Louis RP (2003) Functional and radiographic outcome of thoracolumbar and lumbar burst fractures managed by closed orthopaedic reduction and casting. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28(21):2459–2465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. McLain RF (2004) Functional outcomes after surgery for spinal fractures: return to work and activity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 29(4):470–477, Z6

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful for the financial support of the Project of National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 11072021) and Wu Jie Ping Medical Foundation (No. 320.6750.11017).

Conflict of interest

Each author certifies that he has no commercial associations that might pose a conflict of interest with the submitted article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopedics, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, 154, Anshan Street, Heping District, Tianjin, 300052, China

    Gui Jun Xu, Zhi Jun Li, Jian Xiong Ma, Tao Zhang & Xin Long Ma

  2. Department of Orthopedics, Tianjin Hospital, 406, Jiefang Nan Street, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300211, China

    Xin Fu & Xin Long Ma

Authors
  1. Gui Jun Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zhi Jun Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jian Xiong Ma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Tao Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Xin Fu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Xin Long Ma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xin Long Ma.

Additional information

G. J. Xu and Z. J. Li equally contributed to the study.

X. Fu and X. L. Ma equally contributed to the corresponding author.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Xu, G.J., Li, Z.J., Ma, J.X. et al. Anterior versus posterior approach for treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures: a meta-analysis. Eur Spine J 22, 2176–2183 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-013-2987-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-013-2987-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation