Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Clinical outcomes of patients with lumbar disc herniation, selected for one-level open-discectomy and microdiscectomy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of our study was twofold: firstly, to compare the preoperative and postoperative results at mid-term follow-up periods along with the data of the control group. Secondly, to evaluate the effectiveness among open-discectomy and microdiscectomy surgical groups. In the present study, we investigated a cohort of 100 patients with the lumbar disc herniation causing low back pain compared to 100 subjects of the control group with the non-specific low back pain by applying physical activity, pain scale, Short Form 36 General Health Questionnaire and additional postoperative records of patient’s satisfaction and complications level, consumption of analgesics, and return to work status. The quantitative analysis of all questionnaires showed substantial differences in the preoperative and postoperative groups. The best results were achieved at the second year follow-up period. However, there were no statistically significant differences in both the examined surgical subgroups (p > 0.05). In addition, we estimated from moderate to great statistical significance (p < 0.01–0.05) among preoperative and overall postoperative results: PHC and MHC in the SF-36, Oswestry and VAS. The total increased satisfaction, reherniation rate and return to work frequency comprised 40, 9 and 64%, respectively. The analgesics were still indicated for 21% of the patients. The results of the present study suggest of sufficient decompression in both surgical groups, as the health-related quality of life parameters (Oswestry, VAS and SF-36) were defined as clinically improved. Regardless of persisted minor pain in both areas, it remained greater in the low back than in the leg, which should be held for beneficial to decompressive surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Albert TJ, Balderston RA, Heller JG, Herkowitz HN, Garfin SR, Tomany K et al (1993) Upper lumbar disc herniations. J Spinal Disord 6(4):351–359

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Atlas SJ, Keller RB, Wu YA, Deyo RA, Singer DE (2005) Long-term outcomes of surgical and nonsurgical management of sciatica secondary to a lumbar disc herniation: 10 year results from the maine lumbar spine study. Spine 30(8):927–935

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bernsmann K, Kramer J, Ziozios I, Wehmeier J, Wiese M (2001) Lumbar micro disc surgery with and without autologous fat graft. A prospective randomized trial evaluated with reference to clinical and social factors. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 121(8):476–480

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bombardier C (2000) Outcome assessments in the evaluation of treatment of spinal disorders: summary and general recommendations. Spine 25(24):3100–3103

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Buttermann GR (2004) Treatment of lumbar disc herniation: epidural steroid injection compared with discectomy. A prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A(4):670–679

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Carlsson AM (1983) Assessment of chronic pain. I. Aspects of the reliability and validity of the visual analogue scale. Pain 16(1):87–101

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Carragee EJ, Han MY, Suen PW, Kim D (2003) Clinical outcomes after lumbar discectomy for sciatica: the effects of fragment type and anular competence. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A(1):102–108

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Carragee EJ, Han MY, Yang B, Kim DH, Kraemer H, Billys J (1999) Activity restrictions after posterior lumbar discectomy. A prospective study of outcomes in 152 cases with no postoperative restrictions. Spine 24(22):2346–2351

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Caspar W, Campbell B, Barbier DD, Kretschmmer R, Gotfried Y (1991) The Caspar microsurgical discectomy and comparison with a conventional standard lumbar disc procedure. Neurosurgery 28(1):78–86 (discussion 86–87)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cho DY, Lin HL, Lee WY, Lee HC (2007) Split-spinous process laminotomy and discectomy for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a preliminary report. J Neurosurg Spine 6(3):229–239

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Dolan P, Greenfield K, Nelson RJ, Nelson IW (2000) Can exercise therapy improve the outcome of microdiscectomy? Spine 25(12):1523–1532

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ebeling U, Reichenberg W, Reulen HJ (1986) Results of microsurgical lumbar discectomy. Review on 485 patients. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 81(1–2):45–52

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Epstein JA, Lavine LS, Epstein BS (1967) Recurrent herniation of the lumbar intervertebral disk. Clin Orthop Relat Res 52:169–178

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Fairbank JC, Couper J, Davies JB, O’Brien JP (1980) The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire. Physiotherapy 66(8):271–273

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Fairbank JC, Pynsent PB (2000) The Oswestry Disability Index. Spine 25(22):2940–2952 (discussion 2952)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Fiume D, Sherkat S, Callovini GM, Parziale G, Gazzeri G (1995) Treatment of the failed back surgery syndrome due to lumbo-sacral epidural fibrosis. Acta Neurochir Suppl 64:116–118

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Floman Y, Millgram MA, Smorgick Y, Rand N, Ashkenazi E (2007) Failure of the Wallis interspinous implant to lower the incidence of recurrent lumbar disc herniations in patients undergoing primary disc excision. J Spinal Disord Tech 20(5):337–341

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Gatchel RJ, Mayer T, Dersh J, Robinson R, Polatin P (1999) The association of the SF-36 health status survey with 1-year socioeconomic outcomes in a chronically disabled spinal disorder population. Spine 24(20):2162–2170

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gerszten PC, Welch WC, McGrath PM, Willis SL (2002) A prospective outcomes study of patients undergoing intradiscal electrothermy (IDET) for chronic low back pain. Pain Physician 5(4):360–364

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Gorgulu A, Simsek O, Cobanoglu S, Imer M, Parsak T (2004) The effect of epidural free fat graft on the outcome of lumbar disc surgery. Neurosurg Rev 27(3):181–184

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Graham RC, Hughes RA (2006) A modified peripheral neuropathy scale: the Overall Neuropathy Limitations Scale. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 77(8):973–976

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Guyatt GH, Townsend M, Berman LB, Keller JL (1987) A comparison of Likert and visual analogue scales for measuring change in function. J Chronic Dis 40(12):1129–1133

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hagg O, Fritzell P, Nordwall A (2003) The clinical importance of changes in outcome scores after treatment for chronic low back pain. Eur Spine J 12(1):12–20

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hakkinen A, Kautiainen H, Jarvenpaa S, Arkela-Kautiainen M, Ylinen J (2007) Changes in the total Oswestry Index and its ten items in females and males pre- and post-surgery for lumbar disc herniation: a 1-year follow-up. Eur Spine J 16(3):347–352

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Heliovaara M, Impivaara O, Sievers K, Melkas T, Knekt P, Korpi J et al (1987) Lumbar disc syndrome in Finland. J Epidemiol Community Health 41(3):251–258

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Hersht M, Massicotte EM, Bernstein M (2007) Patient satisfaction with outpatient lumbar microsurgical discectomy: a qualitative study. Can J Surg 50(6):445–449

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Hoogland T, Schubert M, Miklitz B, Ramirez A (2006) Transforaminal posterolateral endoscopic discectomy with or without the combination of a low-dose chymopapain: a prospective randomized study in 280 consecutive cases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31(24):E890–E897

    Google Scholar 

  28. Hoogland T, van den Brekel-Dijkstra K, Schubert M, Miklitz B (2008) Endoscopic transforaminal discectomy for recurrent lumbar disc herniation: a prospective, cohort evaluation of 262 consecutive cases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33(9):973–978

    Google Scholar 

  29. Iwa H, Caspar W (1978) A microsurgery operation for lumbar disc herniation (author’s transl). No Shinkei Geka 6(7):657–662

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Jensen TT, Asmussen K, Berg-Hansen EM, Lauritsen B, Manniche C, Vinterberg H et al (1996) First-time operation for lumbar disc herniation with or without free fat transplantation. Prospective triple-blind randomized study with reference to clinical factors and enhanced computed tomographic scan 1 year after operation. Spine 21(9):1072–1076

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Jonsson E, Nachemson A (2000) Collected knowledge about back pain and neck pain. What we know–and what we don’t know. Lakartidningen 97(44):4974–4980

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Katayama Y, Matsuyama Y, Yoshihara H, Sakai Y, Nakamura H, Nakashima S et al (2006) Comparison of surgical outcomes between macro discectomy and micro discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a prospective randomized study with surgery performed by the same spine surgeon. J Spinal Disord Tech 19(5):344–347

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Lagarrigue J, Chaynes P (1994) Comparative study of disk surgery with or without microscopy. A prospective study of 80 cases. Neurochirurgie 40(2):116–120

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Luoma K, Riihimaki H, Luukkonen R, Raininko R, Viikari-Juntura E, Lamminen A (2000) Low back pain in relation to lumbar disc degeneration. Spine 25(4):487–492

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Maniadakis N, Gray A (2000) The economic burden of back pain in the UK. Pain 84(1):95–103

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Mannion AF, Junge A, Grob D, Dvorak J, Fairbank JC (2006) Development of a German version of the Oswestry Disability Index. Part 2: sensitivity to change after spinal surgery. Eur Spine J 15(1):66–73

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Mariconda M, Galasso O, Secondulfo V, Rotonda GD, Milano C (2006) Minimum 25-year outcome and functional assessment of lumbar discectomy. Spine 31(22):2593–2599 (discussion 2600-1)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Mixter WJ (1952) Pitfalls in the surgery of the ruptured intervertebral disk. J Fla Med Assoc 39(3):159–167

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Nygaard OP, Jacobsen EA, Solberg T, Kloster R, Dullerud R (1999) Nerve root signs on postoperative lumbar MR imaging. A prospective cohort study with contrast enhanced MRI in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients one year after microdiscectomy. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 141(6):619–622 (discussion 623)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Nygaard OP, Kloster R, Dullerud R, Jacobsen EA, Mellgren SI (1997) No association between peridural scar and outcome after lumbar microdiscectomy. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 139(12):1095–1100

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Osterman H, Seitsalo S, Karppinen J, Malmivaara A (2006) Effectiveness of microdiscectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a randomized controlled trial with 2 years of follow-up. Spine 31(21):2409–2414

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Padua R, Padua S, Romanini E, Padua L, de Santis E (1999) Ten- to 15-year outcome of surgery for lumbar disc herniation: radiographic instability and clinical findings. Eur Spine J 8(1):70–74

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Peul WC, van Houwelingen HC, Van Den Hout WB, Brand R, Eekhof JA, Tans JT et al (2007) Surgery versus prolonged conservative treatment for sciatica. N Engl J Med 356(22):2245–2256

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Puolakka K, Ylinen J, Neva MH, Kautiainen H, Hakkinen A (2008) Risk factors for back pain-related loss of working time after surgery for lumbar disc herniation: a 5-year follow-up study. Eur Spine J 17(3):386–392

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Righesso O, Falavigna A, Avanzi O (2007) Comparison of open discectomy with microendoscopic discectomy in lumbar disc herniations: results of a randomized controlled trial. Neurosurgery 61(3):545–549 (discussion 549)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Ruetten S, Komp M, Merk H, Godolias G (2007) Use of newly developed instruments and endoscopes: full-endoscopic resection of lumbar disc herniations via the interlaminar and lateral transforaminal approach. J Neurosurg Spine 6(6):521–530

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Rugiene R, Dadoniene J, Venalis A (2005) Adaptation of health-related quality of life (“SF-36”) questionnaire, its validation and assessment of performance for control group and patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Medicina (Kaunas) 41(3):232–239

    Google Scholar 

  48. Schwetlick G (1998) Microsurgery in lumbar disk operations. Possibilities, methods and results. Orthopade 27(7):457–465

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Spakauskas B, Dambrauskas Z, Krikscionaitiene A (2002) Pain in failed back surgery syndrome. Medicina (Kaunas) 38(8):808–815

    Google Scholar 

  50. Thomas KC, Fisher CG, Boyd M, Bishop P, Wing P, Dvorak MF (2007) Outcome evaluation of surgical and nonsurgical management of lumbar disc protrusion causing radiculopathy. Spine 32(13):1414–1422

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Tullberg T, Isacson J, Weidenhielm L (1993) Does microscopic removal of lumbar disc herniation lead to better results than the standard procedure? Results of a one-year randomized study. Spine 18(1):24–27

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Veresciagina K, Ambrozaitis KV, Spakauskas B (2007) Health-related quality-of-life assessment in patients with low back pain using SF-36 questionnaire. Medicina (Kaunas) 43(8):607–613

    Google Scholar 

  53. Waguespack A, Schofferman J, Slosar P, Reynolds J (2002) Etiology of long-term failures of lumbar spine surgery. Pain Med 3(1):18–22

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Weinstein JN, Tosteson TD, Lurie JD, Tosteson AN, Hanscom B, Skinner JS et al (2006) Surgical vs nonoperative treatment for lumbar disk herniation: the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT): a randomized trial. JAMA 296(20):2441–2450

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Welch WC, Gerszten PC (2002) Alternative strategies for lumbar discectomy: intradiscal electrothermy and nucleoplasty. Neurosurg Focus 13(2):E7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Williams RW (1978) Microlumbar discectomy: a conservative surgical approach to the virgin herniated lumbar disc. Spine 3(2):175–182

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Yorimitsu E, Chiba K, Toyama Y, Hirabayashi K (2001) Long-term outcomes of standard discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a follow-up study of more than 10 years. Spine 26(6):652–657

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Zanoli G, Jonsson B, Stromqvist B (2006) SF-36 scores in degenerative lumbar spine disorders: analysis of prospective data from 451 patients. Acta Orthop 77(2):298–306

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Zanoli G, Stromqvist B, Jonsson B (2001) Visual analog scales for interpretation of back and leg pain intensity in patients operated for degenerative lumbar spine disorders. Spine 26(21):2375–2380

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Clinic of Neurosurgery, Kaunas University of Medicine Hospital, Eivenių 2, 50009, Kaunas, Lithuania

    Kotryna Veresciagina, Bronius Spakauskas & Kazys Vytautas Ambrozaitis

Authors
  1. Kotryna Veresciagina
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bronius Spakauskas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kazys Vytautas Ambrozaitis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kotryna Veresciagina.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Veresciagina, K., Spakauskas, B. & Ambrozaitis, K.V. Clinical outcomes of patients with lumbar disc herniation, selected for one-level open-discectomy and microdiscectomy. Eur Spine J 19, 1450–1458 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-010-1431-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-010-1431-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation