Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Adjacent vertebral failure after vertebroplasty: a biomechanical study of low-modulus PMMA cement

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

PMMA is the most common bone substitute used for vertebroplasty. An increased fracture rate of the adjacent vertebrae has been observed after vertebroplasty. Decreased failure strength has been noted in a laboratory study of augmented functional spine units (FSUs), where the adjacent, non-augmented vertebral body always failed. This may provide evidence that rigid cement augmentation may facilitate the subsequent collapse of the adjacent vertebrae. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the decrease in failure strength of augmented FSUs can be avoided using low-modulus PMMA bone cement. In cadaveric FSUs, overall stiffness, failure strength and stiffness of the two vertebral bodies were determined under compression for both the treated and untreated specimens. Augmentation was performed on the caudal vertebrae with either regular or low-modulus PMMA. Endplate and wedge-shaped fractures occurred in the cranial and caudal vertebrae in the ratios endplate:wedge (cranial:caudal): 3:8 (5:6), 4:7 (7:4) and 10:1 (10:1) for control, low-modulus and regular cement group, respectively. The mean failure strength was 3.3 ± 1 MPa with low-modulus cement, 2.9 ± 1.2 MPa with regular cement and 3.6 ± 1.3 MPa for the control group. Differences between the groups were not significant (p = 0.754 and p = 0.375, respectively, for low-modulus cement vs. control and regular cement vs. control). Overall FSU stiffness was not significantly affected by augmentation. Significant differences were observed for the stiffness differences of the cranial to the caudal vertebral body for the regular PMMA group to the other groups (p < 0.003). The individual vertebral stiffness values clearly showed the stiffening effect of the regular cement and the lesser alteration of the stiffness of the augmented vertebrae using the low-modulus PMMA compared to the control group (p = 0.999). In vitro biomechanical study and biomechanical evaluation of the hypothesis state that the failure strength of augmented functional spine units could be better preserved using low-modulus PMMA in comparison to regular PMMA cement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ananthakrishnan D, Berven S, Deviren V, Cheng K, Lotz JC, Xu Z, Puttlitz CM (2005) The effect on anterior column loading due to different vertebral augmentation techniques. Clin Biomech 20:25–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Banse X, Sims TJ, Bailey AJ (2002) Mechanical properties of adult vertebral cancellous bone: correlation with collagen intermolecular cross-links. J Bone Miner Res 17(9):1621–1628

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Baroud G, Nemes J, Heini P, Steffen T (2003) Load shift of the intervertebral disc after a vertebroplasty: a finite-element study. Eur Spine J 12:421–426

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Baroud G, Nemes J, Ferguson SJ, Steffen T (2003) Material changes in osteoporotic human cancellous bone following infiltration with acrylic bone cement for a vertebral cement augmentation. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng 6(2):133–139

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Belkoff SM, Mathis JM, Erbe EM, Fenton DC (2000) Biomechanical evaluation of a new bone cement for use in vertebroplasty. Spine 25:1061–1064

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Belkoff SM, Maroney M, Fenton DC, Mathis JM (1999) An in vitro biomechanical evaluation of bone cements used in percutaneous vertebroplasty. Bone 25(2):23S–26S

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Berlemann U, Ferguson SJ, Nolte LP, Heini PF (2002) Adjacent vertebral failure after vertebroplasty. A biomechanical investigation. J Bone Joint Surg Br 84:748–752

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Boger A, Bohner M, Heini P, Verrier S, Schneider E (2005) Properties of a low-modulus PMMA bone cement for osteoporotic bone. Eur Cell Mater 10(1):17

    Google Scholar 

  9. Boger A, Heini P, Bohner M, Schneider E (2006) Vertebral cancellous bone augmented with stiffness-adapted pmma cement does not show acute failure under dynamic loading. Eur Cell Mater 11(1):29

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cooper C, Melton LJ 3rd (1992) Vertebral fractures. BMJ 304(6842):1634–1635

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Fyhrie DP, Vashishth D (2000) Bone stiffness predicts strength similarly for human vertebral cancellous bone in compression and for cortical bone in tension. Bone 26(2):169–173

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Grados F, Depriester C, Cayrolle G, Hardy N, Deramond H, Fardellone P (2000) Long-term observations of vertebral osteoporotic fractures treated by percutaneous vertebroplasty. Rheumatology (Oxford) 39:1410–1414

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Heini PF, Orler R (2004) Vertebroplasty in severe osteoporosis. Technique and experience with multi-segment injection. Orthopäde 33(1):22–30

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Heini PF, Wälchli B, Berlemann U (2000) Percutaneous transpedicular vertebroplasty with PMMA: operative technique and early results; A prospective study for the treatment of osteoporotic compressionfractures. Eur Spine J 9:445–450

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Jobbágy Á, Furnée EH, Romhányi B, Gyöngy L, Soós G (1998) Resolution and accuracy of passive marker-based motion analysis. In: Proceedings of the 8th international IMEKO TC-13 conference on measurement in clinical medicine, Dubrovnik, Croatia, 16–19 September 1998, pp 2.3–2.6

  16. Pérez-Higueras A, Alvarez L, Rossi RE, Quinones D, Al-Assir I (2002) Percutaneous vertebroplasty : long-term clinical and radiological outcome. Neuroradiology 44:950–954

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Polikeit A, Nolte LP, Ferguson SJ (2003) The effect of cement augmentation on the load transfer in an osteoporotic functional spinal unit. Spine 28(10):991–996

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Schildhauer TA, Bennett AP, Wright TM, Lane JM, O’Leary PF (1999) Intravertebral body reconstruction with an injectable in situ-setting carbonated apatite: biomechanical evaluation of a minimally invasive technique. J Orthop Res 17(1):67–72

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Uppin AA, Hirsch JA, Centenera LV, Pfiefer BA, Pazianos AG, Choi IS (2003) Occurrence of new vertebral body fracture after percutaneous vertebroplasty in patients with osteoporosis. Radiology 226(1):119–124

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Wasnich RD (1996) Vertebral fracture epidemiology. Bone 18:179–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Windolf M,Götzen N, Morlock MM (2005) Genauigkeitsanalyse des Vicon Motion-Analysis-Systems—Experimentelle Analyse unter Einsatz eines Kalibrier- und Messroboters. Biomechanika, Hamburg

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Beat Schenk and Kurtis Wheeler from Synthes Biomaterials in Oberdorf, Switzerland, for providing the material components and proof reading.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. AO Research Institute, Clavadelerstrasse 8, 7270, Davos Platz, Switzerland

    Andreas Boger, Markus Windolf & Erich Schneider

  2. Orthopedic Surgery, University of Berne, Inselspital, 3010, Bern, Switzerland

    Paul Heini

Authors
  1. Andreas Boger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Paul Heini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Markus Windolf
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Erich Schneider
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andreas Boger.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Boger, A., Heini, P., Windolf, M. et al. Adjacent vertebral failure after vertebroplasty: a biomechanical study of low-modulus PMMA cement. Eur Spine J 16, 2118–2125 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-007-0473-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-007-0473-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation