Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Surgical treatment of spondylodiscitis in the cervical spine: a minimum 2-year follow-up

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cervical spine spondylodiscitis is a rare, but serious manifestation of spinal infection. We present a retrospective study of 20 consecutive patients between 01/1994 and 12/1999 treated because of cervical spondylodiscitis. Mean age at the time of treatment was 59.7 (range 34–81) years, nine of them female. In all cases, diagnosis had been established with a delay. All patients in this series underwent surgery such as radical debridement, decompression if necessary, autologous bone grafting and instrumentation. Surgery was indicated if a neurological deficit, symptoms of sepsis, epidural abscess formation with consecutive stenosis, instability or severe deformity were present. Postoperative antibiotic therapy was carried out for 8–12 weeks. Follow-up examinations were performed a mean of 37 (range 24–63) months after surgery. Healing of the inflammation was confirmed in all cases by laboratory, clinical and radiological parameters. Spondylodesis was controlled radiologically and could be achieved in all cases. One case showed a 15°kyphotic angle in the proximal adjacent segment. Spontaneous bony bridging of the proximal adjacent segment was observed in one patient. In the other cases the adjacent segments radiologically showed neither fusion nor infection related changes. Preoperative neurological deficits improved in all cases. Residual neurological deficits persisted in three of eight cases. The results indicate that spondylodiscitis in cervical spine should be treated early and aggressive to avoid local and systemic complications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Reference

  1. Ditunno JF, Young W, Donovan WH, et al (1994) The international standards booklet for neurological and functional classification of spinal cord injury. Paraplegia 32:70–80

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Endress C, Guyot DR, Fata J, Salciccioli G (1990) Cervical osteomyelitis due to IV heroin use: radiologic findings in 14 patient. AJR Am J Roentgenol 155: 333–335

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Eysel P, Hopf C, Vogel I, et al (1997) Primary stable anterior instrumentation or dorsoventral spondylodesis in spondylodiscitis? Eur Spine J 6:152–157

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Fayazi AH, Ludwig SC, Dabbah M, Bryan Butler R, Gelb DE (2004) Preliminary results of staged anterior debridement and reconstruction using titanium mesh cages in the treatment of thoracolumbar vertebral osteomyelitis. Spine J 4:388–295

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hadjipavlou AG, Mader JT, Necessary JT, et al (2000) Hematogenous pyogenic spinal infection and their surgical management. Spine 25:1668–1679

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Harms J, Tabasso G (1999) Instrumented spinal surgery. Thieme, Stuttgart, New York

  7. Heindel W, Lanfermann H, du Mesnil R, et al (1993) Infections of the cervical spine. Aktuelle Radiol 6:308–316

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hopf C, Meurer A, Eysel P, et al (1989) Operative treatment of spondylodiscitis—what is the most effective approach? Neurosurg Rev 21:217–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jeanneret B, Magerl F (1994) Treatment of osteomyelitis of the spine using percutaneous suction/irrigation and percutaneous external spinal fixation. J Spinal Disord 7:185–205

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Klöckner C, Valencia R, Weber U (2001) Sagittal alignment following surgical therapy of destructive spondylodiscitis: ventral or ventrodorsal procedure—a comparison of results. Orthopade 30:965–976

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Krödel A, Stürz H (1989) Differentiated surgical and conservative treatment of spondylitis and spondylodiscitis. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 127:589–596

    Google Scholar 

  12. Krödel A, Stürz H, Siebert CH (1991) Indications for and results of operative treatment of spondylitis and spondylodiscitis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 110:78–82

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lange M, Tiecks F, Schielke E, et al (1993) Diagnosis and results of different treatment regimes in patients with spinal abscesses. Acta Neurochir (Wien):105–114

  14. Lewis M, Grundy D (1992) Vertebral osteomyelitis following manipulation of spondylitic necks—a possible risk. Paraplegia 30:788–790

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Liebergall M, Chaimsky G, Lowe J, et al (1991) Pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis with paralysis. Clin Orthop 269:142–150

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Liljenqvist U, Lerner T, Bullmann V, Hackenberg L, Halm H, Winkelmann W (2003) Titanium cages in the surgical treatment of severe vertebral osteomyelitis. Eur Spine J 12:606–612

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Malawsky SK, Lukawski S (1991) Pyogenic infections of the spine. Clin Orthop 272: 58–66

    Google Scholar 

  18. Maynard FM, Bracken MB, Creasey G, et al (1997) International standards for neurological and functional classification of spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 35:266–274

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Moser E (1989) Skeletal scintigraphic findings in spinal diseases. Radiologe 29:164–169

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Przybylski GJ, Sharan AD (2001) Single-stage autogenous bone grafting and internal fixation in the surgical management of pyogenic discitis and vertebral osteomyelitis. J Neurosurg 94:1–7

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Pszolla N, Strecker W, Hartwig E, et al (2000) Tuberculous spondylitis of the cervical spine. Unfallchirurg 103:322–325

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Reihsaus E, Waldbauer H, Seeling W (2000) Spinal epidural abscess: a meta-analysis of 915 patients. Neurosurg Rev 232:175–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ruiz A, Post MJD, Ganz W (1995) Inflammatory and infectious processes of the cervical spine. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 5:401–425

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Scale D, Schmit E, Jäger A (1994) Zum Korrekturverlust operativ behandelter HWS—Spondylitiden. In: Matzen K.A. Die operative Behandlung der Halswirbelsäule, M. Zuckschwerdt, 73–78, München

  25. Schimmer RC, Jeanneret C, Nunley PC, Jeanneret B (2002) Osteomyelitis of the cervical spine. A potentially dramatic disease. J Spinal Disord Tech 15: 110–117

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Schinkell C, Gottwald M, Andress HJ (2003) Surgical treatment of spondylodiscitis. Surg Infect 4: 387–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Seifert V, Zimmermann M, Stolke D, et al (1993) Spondylectomy, microsurgical decompression and osteosynthesis in the treatment of complex disorders of the cervical spine. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 4:104–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Shad A, Shariff S, Fairbank J, Byren L, Teddy PJMAD, Cadoux-Hudson TAD (2003) Internal fixation for osteomyelitis of the spine: the issue of persistence of culture positive infection around the implants. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 45:957–960

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Sindern E, Gläser E, Bötel U, et al (1993) Spondylodiscitis with spinal and radicular deficits. Limits of conservative treatment. Nervenarzt 64:801–805

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Spies EH, Stucker R, Reichelt A (1999) Conservative management of pyogenic osteomyelitis of the occipitocervical junction. Spine 24:818–822

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Spuck S, Arnold H, Kranz R, Solbach W, Kaemmerer R (2005) Rapid manifestation of cervical vertebral osteomyelitis. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 147:671–673

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Swanson AN, Pappou IP, Cammisa FP, Girardi FP 06) Chronic infections of the spine. Clin Orthop Relat Res 444:100–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Tay BK, Deckey J, Hu SS (2002) Spinal infections. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 10:188–197

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Turgut M (2001) Spinal tuberculosis (Pott’s disease): its clinical presentation, surgical management, and outcome. A survey study on 694 patients. Neurosurg Rev 24:8–13

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Ulmar B, Richter K, Kelsch G, Cakir B, Puhl W, Huch K (2005) Distractible vertebral body replacement for the thoracic and lumbar spine. Acta Orthop Belg 71:467–471

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Weber M, Heller KD, Wirtz D, et al (1998) Percutaneous CT-controlled puncture and drainage of spondylodiscitis—minimal invasive method. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 136:375–379

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopedics and Spinal Surgery, Zentralklinik Bad Berka, Bad Berka, Germany

    Christoph E. Heyde, Heinrich Boehm, Hesham El Saghir & Ralph Kayser

  2. Department of Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, Charité—University Medical School Campus, Benjamin Franklin Hindenburgdamm 30, 12200, Berlin, Germany

    Christoph E. Heyde, Sven K. Tschöke & Ralph Kayser

Authors
  1. Christoph E. Heyde
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Heinrich Boehm
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hesham El Saghir
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sven K. Tschöke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ralph Kayser
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christoph E. Heyde.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Heyde, C.E., Boehm, H., El Saghir, H. et al. Surgical treatment of spondylodiscitis in the cervical spine: a minimum 2-year follow-up. Eur Spine J 15, 1380–1387 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-006-0191-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-006-0191-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation