Skip to main content
Log in

New malignant grading system for hepatocellular carcinoma using the Sonazoid contrast agent for ultrasonography

  • Original Article—Liver, Pancreas, and Biliary Tract
  • Published:
Journal of Gastroenterology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The ultrasonography contrast agent Sonazoid provides parenchyma-specific contrast imaging (Kupffer imaging) based on its accumulation in Kupffer cells. This agent also facilitates imaging of the fine vascular architecture in tumors through maximum intensity projection (MIP). We examined the clinical utility of the malignancy grading system for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) using a combination of 2 different contrast-enhanced ultrasonography images.

Methods

We studied 121 histologically confirmed cases of HCC (well-differentiated, 45; moderately differentiated, 70; poorly differentiated, 6). The results of Kupffer imaging were classified as (1) iso-echoic pattern or (2) hypo-echoic pattern. The MIP patterns produced were classified into one of the following categories: fine, tumor vessels were not clearly visualized and only fine vessels were visualized; vascular, tumor vessels were visualized clearly; irregular, tumor vessels were thick and irregular. Based on the combined assessment of Kupffer imaging and the MIP pattern, the samples were classified into 4 grades: Grade 1 (iso-fine/vascular), Grade 2 (hypo-fine), Grade 3 (hypo-vascular), and Grade 4 (hypo-irregular).

Results

The distribution of moderately and poorly differentiated HCCs was as follows: Grade 1, 4 % (1/24); Grade 2, 52 % (15/29); Grade 3, 85 % (44/52); and Grade 4, 100 % (16/16). The grading system also predicted portal vein invasion in 72 resected HCCs: Grade 1, 0 % (0/4); Grade 2, 13 % (1/8); Grade 3, 23 % (11/48); and Grade 4, 67 % (8/12).

Conclusions

This new malignant grading system is useful for estimation of histological differentiation and portal vein invasion of HCC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. El-Serag HB, Rudolph KL. Hepatocellular carcinoma: epidemiology and molecular carcinogenesis. Gastroenterology. 2007;132:2557–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P. Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin. 2005;55:74–108.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Tamura S, Kato T, Berho M, Misiakos EP, O’Brien C, Reddy KR, et al. Impact of histological grade of hepatocellular carcinoma on the outcome of liver transplantation. Arch Surg. 2001;136:25–30 Discussion 31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kumada T, Nakano S, Takeda I, Sugiyama K, Osada T, Kiriyama S, et al. Patterns of recurrence after initial treatment in patients with small hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 1997;25:87–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sakurai M, Okamura J, Seki K, Kuroda C. Needle tract implantation of hepatocellular carcinoma after percutaneous liver biopsy. Am J Surg Pathol. 1983;7:191–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Smith EH. Complications of percutaneous abdominal fine-needle biopsy. Review. Radiology. 1991;178:253–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Watanabe R, Matsumura M, Chen CJ, Kaneda Y, Ishihara M, Fujimaki M. Gray-scale liver enhancement with Sonazoid (NC100100), a novel ultrasound contrast agent; detection of hepatic tumors in a rabbit model. Biol Pharm Bull. 2003;26:1272–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hagen EK, Forsberg F, Aksnes AK, Merton DA, Liu JB, Tornes A, et al. Enhanced detection of blood flow in the normal canine prostate using an ultrasound contrast agent. Invest Radiol. 2000;35:118–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Yao J, Teupe C, Takeuchi M, Avelar E, Sheahan M, Connolly R, et al. Quantitative 3-dimensional contrast echocardiographic determination of myocardial mass at risk and residual infarct mass after reperfusion: experimental canine studies with intravenous contrast agent NC100100. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2000;13:570–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Korenaga K, Korenaga M, Furukawa M, Yamasaki T, Sakaida I. Usefulness of Sonazoid contrast-enhanced ultrasonography for hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison with pathological diagnosis and superparamagnetic iron oxide magnetic resonance images. J Gastroenterol. 2009;44:733–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Imai Y, Murakami T, Yoshida S, Nishikawa M, Ohsawa M, Tokunaga K, et al. Superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced magnetic resonance images of hepatocellular carcinoma: correlation with histological grading. Hepatology. 2000;32:205–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Inoue T, Kudo M, Watai R, Pei Z, Kawasaki T, Minami Y, et al. Differential diagnosis of nodular lesions in cirrhotic liver by post-vascular phase contrast-enhanced US with Levovist: comparison with superparamagnetic iron oxide magnetic resonance images. J Gastroenterol. 2005;40:1139–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wilson SR, Jang HJ, Kim TK, Iijima H, Kamiyama N, Burns PN. Real-time temporal maximum-intensity-projection imaging of hepatic lesions with contrast-enhanced sonography. Am J Roentgenol. 2008;190:691–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sugimoto K, Moriyasu F, Kamiyama N, Metoki R, Yamada M, Imai Y, et al. Analysis of morphological vascular changes of hepatocellular carcinoma by microflow imaging using contrast-enhanced sonography. Hepatol Res. 2008;38:790–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Terminology of nodular hepatocellular lesions. International Working Party. Hepatology. 1995;22:983–93.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hayashi M, Matsui O, Ueda K, Kawamori Y, Kadoya M, Yoshikawa J, et al. Correlation between the blood supply and grade of malignancy of hepatocellular nodules associated with liver cirrhosis: evaluation by CT during intraarterial injection of contrast medium. Am J Roentgenol. 1999;172:969–76.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Johnson CM, Sheedy PF, Stanson AW, Stephens DH, Hattery RR, Adson MA. Computed tomography and angiography of cavernous hemangiomas of the liver. Radiology. 1981;138:115–21.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Wen YL, Kudo M, Zheng RQ, Ding H, Zhou P, Minami Y, et al. Characterization of hepatic tumors: value of contrast-enhanced coded phase-inversion harmonic angio. Am J Roentgenol. 2004;182:1019–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

Shuhei Nishiguchi received financial support from Chugai Pharmaceutical, MSD, Dainippon Sumitomo Pharma, Ajinomoto Pharma, and Otsuka Pharmaceutical. Hiroko Iijima received financial support from Chugai Pharmaceutical. Hiroyasu Imanishi received financial support from Chugai Pharmaceutical. The remaining authors have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hironori Tanaka.

Additional information

H. Tanaka and H. Iijima contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tanaka, H., Iijima, H., Higashiura, A. et al. New malignant grading system for hepatocellular carcinoma using the Sonazoid contrast agent for ultrasonography. J Gastroenterol 49, 755–763 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00535-013-0830-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00535-013-0830-1

Keywords

Navigation