Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in patients with lymphadenopathy suspected of recurrent malignancy after curative treatment

  • Alimentary Tract
  • Published:
Journal of Gastroenterology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The diagnosis of lymphadenopathy after treatment of malignancy is sometimes difficult, especially in patients whose treatment was deemed curative and without local recurrence or those who have increased serum levels of related tumor markers. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) as a diagnostic tool in patients with lymphadenopathy after curative treatment of malignancy.

Methods

Consecutive patients with mediastinal, intraabdominal, or pelvic lymphadenopathy after curative treatment of malignancy who were referred to our hospital between October 2003 and September 2007 were enrolled in this study.

Results

A total of 62 patients were included. The lymph nodes were located at the mediastinum in 22 patients, intraabdomen in 38 patients, and intrapelvis in 2 patients. From the pathological findings of the FNA sample, 31 patients (50%) were confirmed to have recurrence of the prior malignancy, and 9 patients (15%) were diagnosed as having a different new malignancy. The remaining 22 patients (35%) were shown to have no recurrence or no other malignancies. However, 1 of them was later diagnosed with recurrence by open laparotomy. The overall sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and positive and negative predictive values of the EUS-FNA were 97%, 100%, 98%, 100%, and 97%, respectively.

Conclusions

Lymphadenopathy after treatment of malignancy is not a definitive sign of recurrence. Therefore, pathological sampling and diagnosis are essential for determining the appropriate treatment. For this purpose, EUS-FNA is a safe, convenient, and minimally invasive procedure with high diagnostic value.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fritscher-Ravens A, Sriram PV, Bobrowski C, Pforte A, Topalidis T, Krause C, et al. Mediastinal lymphadenopathy in patients with or without previous malignancy: EUS-FNA-based differential cytodiagnosis in 153 patients. Am J Gastroenterol 2000;95:2278–2284.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. DeWitt J, Ghorai S, Kahi C, Leblanc J, McHenry L, Chappo J, et al. EUS-FNA of recurrent postoperative extraluminal and metastatic malignancy. Gastrointest Endosc 2003;58:542–548.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kramer H, Koeter GH, Sleijfer DT, van Putten JW, Groen HJ. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in patients with mediastinal abnormalities and previous extrathoracic malignancy. Eur J Cancer 2004;40:559–562.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Yasuda I, Tsurumi H, Omar S, Iwashita T, Kojima Y, Yamada T, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy for lymphadenopathy of unknown origin. Endoscopy 2006;38:919–924.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Iwashita T, Yasuda I, Doi S, Kato T, Sano K, Yasuda S, et al. The yield of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration for histological diagnosis in patients suspected of stage I sarcoidosis. Endoscopy 2008;40:400–405.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kazama T, Faria SC, Varavithya V, Phongkitkarun S, Ito H, Macapinlac HA. FDG PET in the evaluation of treatment for lymphoma: clinical usefulness and pitfalls. Radiographics 2005;25:191–207.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kostakoglu L, Goldsmith SJ. 18F-FDG PET evaluation of the response to therapy for lymphoma and for breast, lung, and colorectal carcinoma. J Nucl Med 2003;44:224–239.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Belhocine T, Spaepen K, Dusart M, Castaigne C. 18FDG PET in oncology: the best and the worst. Int J Oncol 2006;28:1249–1261.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wiersema MJ, Hassig WM, Hawes RH, Wonn MJ. Mediastinal lymph node detection with endosonography. Gastrointest Endosc 1993;39:788–793.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Catalano MF, Sivak MV Jr, Rice T, Gragg LA, Van Dam J. Endosonographic features predictive of lymph node metastasis. Gastrointest Endosc 1994;40:442–446.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bhutani MS, Hawes RH, Hoffman BJ. A comparison of the accuracy of echo features during endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration for diagnosis of malignant lymph node invasion. Gastrointest Endosc 1997;45:474–479.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Fritscher-Ravens A. Endoscopic ultrasound evaluation in the diagnosis and staging of lung cancer. Lung Cancer 2003;41:259–267.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Vazquez-Sequeiros E, Wiersema MJ, Clain JE, Norton ID, Levy MJ, Romero Y, et al. Impact of lymph node staging on therapy of esophageal carcinoma. Gastroenterology 2003;125:1626–1635.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wildi SM, Fickling WE, Day TA, Cunningham CD III, Schmulewitz N, Varadarajulu S, et al. Endoscopic ultrasonography in the diagnosis and staging of neoplasms of the head and neck. Endoscopy 2004;36:624–630.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Catalano MF, Nayar R, Gress F, Scheiman J, Wassef W, Rosenblatt ML, et al. EUS-guided fine needle aspiration in mediastinal lymphadenopathy of unknown etiology. Gastrointest Endosc 2002;55:863–869.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Itaba S, Yoshinaga S, Nakamura K, Mizutani T, Honda K, Takayanagi R, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for the diagnosis of peripancreatic tuberculous lymphadenitis. J Gastroenterol 2007;42:83–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Williams DB, Sahai AV, Aabakken L, Penman ID, van Velse A, Webb J, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration biopsy: a large single centre experience. Gut 1999;44:720–726.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. O’Toole D, Palazzo L, Arotcarena R, Dancour A, Aubert A, Hammel P, et al. Assessment of complications of EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration. Gastrointest Endosc 2001;53:470–474.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Al-Haddad M, Wallace MB, Woodward TA, Gross SA, Hodgens CM, Toton RD, et al. The safety of fine-needle aspiration guided by endoscopic ultrasound: a prospective study. Endoscopy 2008;40:204–208.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Shah JN, Fraker D, Guerry D, Feldman M, Kochman ML. Melanoma seeding of an EUS-guided fine needle track. Gastrointest Endosc 2004;59:923–924.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Paquin SC, Gariepy G, Lepanto L, Bourdages R, Raymond G, Sahai AV. A first report of tumor seeding because of EUS-guided FNA of a pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Gastrointest Endosc 2005;61:610–611.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Doi S, Yasuda I, Iwashita T, Ibuka T, Fukushima H, Araki H, et al. Needle tract implantation on the esophageal wall after EUSguided FNA of metastatic mediastinal lymphadenopathy. Gastrointest Endosc 2008;67:988–990.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Iwashita, T., Yasuda, I., Doi, S. et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in patients with lymphadenopathy suspected of recurrent malignancy after curative treatment. J Gastroenterol 44, 190–196 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00535-008-2302-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00535-008-2302-6

Key words

Navigation