Abstract
Purpose
Different countries have various decision-making practices, which are formalized according to laws, rules, traditions, religious beliefs, and ethical views of different cultural backgrounds. We investigated the characteristics and factors associated with the decision-making details in terminally ill cancer patients in a tertiary cancer center in Shanghai, China.
Method
A single center, retrospective study was performed among advanced cancer patients who died between March 2007 and December 2013 in ward at Palliative Care Unit, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center.
Results
Of 436 patients’ end-of-life (EOL) discussions, 424 (97.2 %) occurred between family caregivers and physicians. The main decision-maker was in the following order: spouse (45.6 %), offsprings (44.3 %), parents (3.2 %), son-/daughter-in-law (1.8 %), and relatives (1.4 %). Two hundred twenty-one (47.3 %) patients received at least one of six life-sustaining treatments. One hundred eighty-four (40.4 %) patients continued artificial nutrition and hydration (ANH) until death. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was performed in 26 patients (6.0 %). Two hundred fourteen (49.1 %) patients received vasopressors before death. Only two patients received mechanical ventilation and only one patient received tracheostomy. The median time interval since the decision made till death was 20.17 h (95 % CI = 18.94–21.40, range 4.3 to 70.2 h). Patients who were older than 65 years old were less likely to undergo an intensive procedure (AOR = 0.559, 95 % CI = 0.367–0.852, p = 0.007). Patients living in urban settings (AOR = 2.177, 95 % CI = 1.398–3.390, p = 0.001) were more likely to undergo an intensive procedure in the EOL period.
Conclusions
This study reflected some Chinese characteristics for decision-making at the end of life among advanced cancer patients. More prospective studies focused on specific EOL issues are required to improve the quality of EOL care.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Yaguchi A, Truog RD, Curtis JR, Luce JM, Levy MM, Melot C, Vincent JL (2005) International differences in end-of-life attitudes in the intensive care unit-results of a survey. Arch Intern Med 165(17):1970–1975
Kumar P, Temel JS (2013) End-of-life care discussions in patients with advanced cancer. J Clin Oncol 31(27):3315–3319
Wright AA, Zhang BH, Ray A et al (2008) Associations between end-of-life discussions, patient mental health, medical care near death, and caregiver bereavement adjustment. JAMA J Am Med Assoc 300(14):1665–1673
Chiu TY, Ho WY, Chen CY (2000) Prevalence and severity of symptoms in terminal cancer patients: a study in Taiwan. Support Care Cancer 8(4):311–313
Wallberg B, Michelson H, Nystedt M, Bolund C, Degner LF, Wilking N (2000) Information needs and preferences for participation in treatment decisions among Swedish breast cancer patients. Acta Oncol 39(4):467–476
van der Heide A, Deliens L, Faisst K et al (2003) End-of-life decision-making in six European countries: descriptive study. Lancet 362(9381):345–350
Richer MC, Ezer H (2000) Understanding beliefs and meanings in the experience of cancer: a concept analysis. J Adv Nurs 32(5):1108–1115
Kae-Hwa J, Gyeong-Ju A (2013) Factors affecting shared decision making at end of life in Korean adults. Holist Nurs Pract 27(6):329–335
Phua J, Kee AC-L, Tan A et al (2011) End-of-life care in the general wards of a Singaporean hospital: an Asian perspective. J Palliat Med 14(12):1296–1301
Ivo K, Younsuck K, Ho YY et al (2012) A survey of the perspectives of patients who are seriously ill regarding end-of-life decisions in some medical institutions of Korea, China and Japan. J Med Ethics 38(5):310–316
Mo HN, Shin DW, Woo JH et al (2012) Is patient autonomy a critical determinant of quality of life in Korea? End-of-life decision making from the perspective of the patient. Palliat Med 26(3):222–231
Akabayashi A, Fetters MD, Elwyn TS (1999) Family consent, communication, and advance directives for cancer disclosure: a Japanese case and discussion. J Med Ethics 25(4):296–301
Bowman KW, Singer PA (2001) Chinese seniors’ perspectives on end-of-life decisions. Soc Sci Med 53(4):455–464
Huang HS, Liu HJ, Zeng TY, Pu XM (2015) Preference of Chinese general public and healthcare providers for a good death. Nurs Ethics 22(2):217–227
Steinhauser KE, Christakis NA, Clipp EC, McNeilly M, McIntyre L, Tulsky JA (2000) Factors considered important at the end of life by patients, family, physicians, and other care providers. JAMA 284(19):2476–2482
Mitchell SL, Teno JM, Kiely DK et al (2009) The clinical course of advanced dementia. NEJM 361(16):1529–1538
Kao C-Y, Cheng S-Y, Chiu T-Y, Chen C-Y, Hu W-Y (2013) Does the awareness of terminal illness influence cancer patients psycho-spiritual state, and their DNR signing: a survey in Taiwan. Jpn J Clin Oncol 43(9):910–916
Huang CH, Hu WY, Chiu TY, Chen CY (2008) The practicalities of terminally ill patients signing their own DNR orders—a study in Taiwan. J Med Ethics 34(5):336–340
Liu JM, Lin WC, Chen YM et al (1999) The status of the do-not-resuscitate order in Chinese clinical trial patients in a cancer centre. J Med Ethics 25(4):309–314
Kwak J, Haley WE (2005) Current research findings on end-of-life decision making among racially or ethnically diverse groups. Gerontologist 45(5):634–641
Fan R (2002) Reconsidering surrogate decision making: Aristotelianism and Confucianism on ideal human relations. Philos East West 52(3):346–372
Kagawa-Singer M, Blackhall LJ (2001) Negotiating cross-cultural issues at the end of life—“You got to go where he lives”. JAMA J Am Med Assoc 286(23):2993–3001
Oh DY, Kim JH, Kim DW et al (2006) CPR or DNR? End-of-life decision in Korean cancer patients: a single center’s experience. Support Care Cancer 14(2):103–108
Bruera E, Hui D, Dalal S et al (2013) Parenteral hydration in patients with advanced cancer: a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 31(1):111–118
Nakajima N, Satake N, Nakaho T (2014) Indications and practice of artificial hydration for terminally ill cancer patients. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care 8(4):358–363
Chiu TY, Hu WT, Chang RB et al (2002) Nutrition and hydration for terminal cancer patients in Taiwan. Support Care Cancer 10(8):630–636
Manalo MFC (2013) End-of-life decisions about withholding or withdrawing therapy: medical, ethical, and religio-cultural considerations. Palliat Care 10(7):1–5
Chiu TY, Hu WY, Chuang RB, Cheng YR, Chen CY, Wakai S (2004) Terminal cancer patients’ wishes and influencing factors toward the provision of artificial nutrition and hydration in Taiwan. J Pain Symptom Manag 27(3):206–214
Diaz-Montes TP, Johnson MK, Giuntoli RL II, Brown AJ (2013) Importance and timing of end-of-life care discussions among gynecologic oncology patients. Am J Hosp Palliat Care 30(1):59–67
Keating NL, Landrum MB, Jr RS et al (2010) Physician factors associated with discussions about end-of-life care. Cancer 116(4):998–1006
Morita T, Tsunoda J, Inoue S, Chihara S (1999) Perceptions and decision-making on rehydration of terminally ill cancer patients and family members. Am J Hosp Palliat Care 16(3):509–516
Wilson ME, Samirat R, Yilmaz M, Gajic O, Iyer VN (2013) Physician staffing models impact the timing of decisions to limit life support in the ICU. Chest 143(3):656–663
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Compliance with ethical standards
Approval to conduct this study was obtained from the FUSCC Ethics Review Board. As all the data assessed in this study were obtained as part of routine clinical assessments from the patients’ medical records, written consent for this study was not obtained from the patients, in accordance with the guidelines of the Chinese Ministry of Health.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gu, X., Chen, M., Liu, M. et al. End-of-life decision-making of terminally ill cancer patients in a tertiary cancer center in Shanghai, China. Support Care Cancer 24, 2209–2215 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-015-3017-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-015-3017-x