Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Sources of social support and adjustment among Chinese cancer survivors: gender and age differences

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Social support has shown to improve adjustment among cancer survivors. However, it is unclear how health benefits of social support depend on the source of support, age, and gender. Chinese culture emphasizes relationship harmony and interdependence, providing a unique opportunity to address these questions. This study investigated how support from different sources was associated with adjustment to cancer and how the association was moderated by gender and age.

Methods

Chinese cancer survivors (N = 238) from Beijing completed a questionnaire packet assessing support from different sources (e.g., family, friends, special others, society, and cancer organization) and adjustment (e.g., quality of life and positive and negative affect).

Results

Perceived support from family was greater than support from other sources among Chinese cancer survivors. After controlling for support from other sources, greater support from family and society was associated with higher quality of life, more positive affect, and less negative affect. Support from family showed a stronger negative correlation with negative affect among males, and support from special others showed a stronger negative correlation with negative affect among females. Support from society had a stronger positive association with quality of life, and support from friends had a stronger negative association with quality of life among younger survivors than among older survivors.

Conclusions

Findings highlight that health benefits of social support depend on the source of support, gender, and age among Chinese cancer survivors. The study has implications for delivering individualized healthcare services tailored to the preferences of cancer survivors based on their cultural backgrounds and demographic characteristics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D (2011) Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 61(2):69–90. doi:10.3322/caac.20107

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cohen S (2004) Social relationships and health. Am Psychol 59(8):676–684. doi:10.1037/0003-066×.59.8.676

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Helgeson VS, Cohen S (1996) Social support and adjustment to cancer: reconciling descriptive, correlational, and intervention research. Health Psychol 15(2):135–148. doi:10.1037//0278-6133.15.2.135

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Dagan M, Sanderman R, Schokker MC, Wiggers T, Baas PC, van Haastert M, Hageddorn M (2011) Spousal support and changes in distress over time in couples coping with cancer: the role of personal control. J Fam Psychol 25(2):310–318. doi:10.1037/a0022887

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Maliski SL, Heilemann MV, McCorkle R (2001) Mastery of postprostatectomy incontinence and impotence: his work, her work, our work. Oncol Nurs Forum 28(6):985–992

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Maly RC, Umezawa Y, Leake B, Silliman R (2005) Mental health outcomes in older women with breast cancer: impact of perceived family support and adjustment. Psychol-Oncol 14(7):535–545. doi:10.1002/pon.869

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hasson-Ohayon I, Goldzweig G, Braun M, Galinsky D (2010) Women with advanced breast cancer and their spouses: diversity of support and psychological distress. Psychol-Oncol 19(11):1195–1204. doi:10.1002/pon.1678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bronfenbrenner U (2000) Ecological systems theory. In: Kazdin AE (ed) Encyclopedia of Psychology. Oxford University, Washington, DC, pp 129–133

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dunn J, Steginga SK, Roseman N, Millichap D (2003) A review of peer support in the context of cancer. J Psychosoc Oncol 21(2):55–67. doi:10.1300/J077v21n02_04

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hagedoorn M, Sanderman R, Bolks HN, Tuinstra J, Coyne JC (2008) Distress in couples coping with cancer: a meta-analysis and critical review of role and gender effect. Psychol Bull 134(1):1–30. doi:10.10377033-2909.134.1.1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Yang K-S (1993) Chinese social orientation: a social-interactive perspective. In: Yang K-S (ed) Chinese psychology and behavior: indigenous research. Guiguan, Taipei, pp 87–121

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kagawa-Singer M, Wellisch D (2003) Breast cancer patients' perceptions of their husbands' support in a cross-cultural context. Psychol-Oncol 12(1):24–37. doi:10.1002/pon.619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Coyne JC, Anderson KK (1999) Marital status, marital satisfaction, and support processes among women at high risk for breast cancer. J Fam Psychol 13(4):629–641. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.13.4.629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Alferi SM, Carver CS, Antoni MH, Weiss S, Duran RE (2001) A exploratory study of social support, distress, and life disruption among low-income Hispanic women under treatment for early stage breast cancer. Health Psychol 20(1):41–46. doi:10.1037//0278-6133.20.1.41

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kim HS, Sherman DK, Taylor SE (2008) Culture and social support. Am Psychol 63(6):518–526. doi:10.1037/0003-066×

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Carstensen LL (2006) The influence of a sense of time on human development. Sci 312:1913–1915. doi:10.1126/science.1127488

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Fung HH, Lai P, Ng R (2001) Age differences in social preferences among Taiwanese and Mainland Chinese: the role of perceived time. Psychol Aging 16:351–356. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.16.2.351

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Cohen S, Wills TA (1985) Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychol Bull 98:310–357. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.98.2.310

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ashing-Giwa K, Padilla G, Tejero J, Kagawa-Singer M (2003) Understanding the breast cancer experience of Asian American women. Psychol-Oncol 12(1):38–58. doi:10.1002/pon.632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Neff LA, Karney BR (2005) Gender differences in social support: a question of skill or responsiveness? J Pers Soc Psychol 88(1):79–90. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.88.1.79

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Greimel ER, Padilla GV, Grant MM (1998) Gender differences in outcomes among patients with cancer. Psychol-Oncol 7(3):197–206. doi:10.1002/(sici)1099-1611(199805/06)7:3<197::aid-pon303>3.0.co;2-q

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Taylor SE, Klein LC, Lewis BP, Gruenewald TL, Gurung RAR, Updegraff JA (2000) Biobehavioral responses to stress in females: tend-and-befriend, not fight-or-flight. Psychol Rev 107(3):411–429. doi:10.1037/0033-295×.107.3.411

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Zeng Y, Wang Z (2003) Dynamics of family and elderly living arrangements in China: new lessons learned from the 2000 Census. Chin Rev 3(2):95–119

    Google Scholar 

  24. Gold T, Doug G, Wank D (2002) Social connections in China: institutions, culture and the changing nature of Guanxi. Cambridge University, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  25. Stanton AL, Collins CA, Sworowski LA (2001) Adjustment to chronic illness: theory and research. In: Revenson TA, Singer JE, Baum A (eds) Handbook of health psychology. Erlbaum, New York

    Google Scholar 

  26. Stanton AL, Revenson TA, Tennen H (2007) Health psychology: psychological adjustment to chronic disease. Ann Rev Psychol 58(1):565–592. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Zimet GD, Powell SS, Farley GK, Werkman S, Berkoff KA (1990) Psychometric properties of multidimensional scale of perceived social support. J Pers Ass 55(3 & 4):610–617. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa5503&4_17

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Xiao C, Wang H, Wang X (2005) The impact of social support and coping styles on the mood of post-operative breast cancer patients. Nanfang J Nurs 12(5):80–82. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1008-9969.2005.05.038

    Google Scholar 

  29. Chen W-F, Zhang J-X (2004) Factorial and construct validity of the Chinese positive and negative affect scale for students. Chin Ment Health J 18(11):763–766

    Google Scholar 

  30. Bradburn NM (ed) (1969) The structure of psychological well-being. Aldine, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  31. Zhang L, Deng X (2009) The mediating role of self-esteem in the relationships between personality traits, social support and subjective well-being. Appl Psychol 15:155–160

    Google Scholar 

  32. Zhou J, Wu Y (1994) Application of affect balance scale among 1242 older adults from Wanxian, Sichuan. Chin J Gerontol 14(6):325–327

    Google Scholar 

  33. Ferrell BR, Hassey-Dow K, Grant M (1995) Measurement of the quality of life in cancer survivors. Qual Life Res 4(6):523–531

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Mu L-B, Jiang C, Liu Q-G, Wang R-Y, Xu P, Shen Y-G, Jiang L (2003) A study in reliability and validity for quality of life scale of breast cancer. Chin J Clin Psychol 11(2):142–143

    Google Scholar 

  35. Aiken LS, West SG (1991) Multiple regression: testing and interpreting interactions. Sage, Newbury Park

    Google Scholar 

  36. Umezawa Y, Lu Q, You J, Kagawa-Singer M, Leake B, Maly R (2012) Belief in divine control, coping, and race/ethnicity among older women with breast cancer. Ann Behav Med 44(1):21–32. doi:10.1007/s12160-012-9358-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Chan W, Epstein I, Reese D, Chan C (2009) Family predictors of psychosocial outcomes among Hong Kong Chinese cancer patients in palliative care: living and dying with the “support paradox”. Soc Work Health Care 48(5):519–532. doi:10.1080/00981380902765824

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Sun LNN, Stewart SM (2000) Psychological adjustment to cancer in a collective culture. Int J Psychol 35(5):177–185. doi:10.1080/00207590050171111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Yeung N, Dai J, Zheng D, Man J, Loh A, Young L, Lu Q (2010) Exploring cancer-related experience and difficulties among Chinese breast cancer survivors living in the US: using expressive writing approach. Psychol-Oncol 20(S1):92. doi:10.1111/J.1755-148×.2011.01915.×

    Google Scholar 

  40. Higgins L, Zheng M, Liu Y, Sun C (2002) Attitudes to marriage and sexual behaviors: a survey of gender and culture differences in China and United Kingdom. Sex Roles 46(3–4):75–89. doi:10.1023/a:1016565426011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Live Strong Organization (2010) Cancer stigma and silence around the world: A livestrong report. http://www.livestrong.org/What-We-Do/Our-Approach/Reports-Findings/Cancer-Stigma-and-Silence-Around-the-World. Accessed 11 June 2011

  42. Tam BKY, Bond MH (2002) Interpersonal behaviors and friendship in a Chinese culture. Asian J Soc Psychol 5(1):63–74. doi:10.1111/1467-839×.00094

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Son J, Lin N, George LK (2008) Cross-national comparison of social support structures between Taiwan and the United States. J Health Soc Behav 49:104–118. doi:10.1017/S0009443901000043

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interests

We declare that there are no conflicts of interest relevant to this manuscript. There is no significant financial support for this manuscript that could influence the outcome. We have full control of all primary data and agree to allow the journal to review our data if requested. The submitted materials have not been published nor is it under review elsewhere.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jin You or Qian Lu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

You, J., Lu, Q. Sources of social support and adjustment among Chinese cancer survivors: gender and age differences. Support Care Cancer 22, 697–704 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-013-2024-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-013-2024-z

Keywords

Navigation