Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Likelihood of children with end-stage kidney disease in Europe to live with a functioning kidney transplant is mainly explained by nonmedical factors

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Registry data can be used to assess associations between medical and health-policy factors and the likelihood of children on renal replacement therapy (RRT) to live with a functioning kidney transplant in Europe.

Methods

A survey questionnaire was distributed among renal registry representatives in 38 European countries, and additional data was obtained from the European Society for Pediatric Nephrology/European Renal Association–European Dialysis and Transplant Association (ESPN/ERA-EDTA) registry.

Results

Thirty-two countries with a pediatric RRT program responded. The median percentage of children by country on RRT with a functioning transplant was 62 % (interquartile range 39–77). One per million population increase in donation rate from deceased donors was associated with a 5 % increase in the percentage of functioning transplants; the existence of an intermediate and high pediatric priority policy doubled and tripled this percentage, respectively, compared with no priority, whereas an increase in living donor pediatric kidney transplant rate of one per million children was associated with a 14 % higher percentage of functioning transplants. The percentage of functioning transplants was also strongly associated with the gross domestic product (GDP).

Conclusion

Considerable variations exist in the percentages of prevalent pediatric RRT populations with functioning renal transplants across Europe. A macroeconomic indicator such as GDP is the most important determinant of these international differences. Efforts should be made for living donation programs and pediatric allocation priority to increase access to kidney transplantation for children.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ANZDATA:

Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry

CI:

Confidence interval

DD:

Deceased donor

ESPN/ERA-EDTA:

European Society for Pediatric Nephrology/European Renal Association–European Dialysis and Transplant Association

ESRD:

End-stage renal disease

GDP:

Gross domestic product per capita

KTx:

Kidney transplantation

LD:

Living donor

pmcp:

Per million child population

pmp:

Per million population

RR:

Relative risk

RRT:

Renal replacement therapy

USRDS:

United States Renal Data System

WHO:

World Health Organization

References

  1. EBPG Expert Group on Renal Transplantation (2002) European best practice guidelines for renal transplantation. Section IV: long-term management of the transplant recipient. IV.11 Paediatrics (specific problems). Nephrol Dial Transplant 17(Suppl 4):55–58

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gillen DL, Stehman-Breen CO, Smith JM, McDonald RA, Warady BA, Brandt JR, Wong CS (2008) Survival advantage of pediatric recipients of a first kidney transplant among children awaiting kidney transplantation. Am J Transplant 8:2600–2606

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Harambat J, van Stralen KJ, Schaefer F, Grenda R, Jankauskiene A, Kostic M, Macher MA, Maxwell H, Puretic Z, Raes A, Rubik J, Sørensen SS, Toots U, Topaloglu R, Tönshoff B, Verrina E, Jager KJ (2013) Disparities in pediatric kidney transplantation policies, practices and rates across Europe. Am J Transplant 13:2066–2074

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Nashan B (2004) Renal allograft allocation for children: are we penalizing children to not penalize adults? Transplantation 77:1145–1146

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Neuberger J (2012) Rationing life-saving resources–how should allocation policies be assessed in solid organ transplantation. Transpl Int 25:3–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Garg PP, Furth SL, Fivush BA, Powe NR (2000) Impact of gender on access to the renal transplant waiting list for pediatric and adult patients. J Am Soc Nephrol 11:958–964

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Furth SL, Garg PP, Neu AM, Hwang W, Fivush BA, Powe NR (2000) Racial differences in access to the kidney transplant waiting list for children and adolescents with end-stage renal disease. Pediatrics 106:756–761

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Patzer RE, Amaral S, Klein M, Kutner N, Perryman JP, Gazmararian JA, McClellan WM (2012) Racial disparities in pediatric access to kidney transplantation: does socioeconomic status play a role? Am J Transplant 12:369–378

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Schoenmaker NJ, Tromp WF, van der Lee JH, Adams B, Bouts AH, Collard L, Cransberg K, van Damme-Lombaerts R, Godefroid N, van Hoeck KJ, Koster-Kamphuis L, Lilien MR, Raes A, Groothoff JW (2012) Disparities in dialysis treatment and outcomes for Dutch and Belgian children with immigrant parents. Pediatr Nephrol 27:1369–1379

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Samuel SM, Hemmelgarn B, Nettel-Aguirre A, Foster B, Soo A, Alexander RT, Tonelli M, Pediatric Renal Outcomes Canada Group (2012) Association between residence location and likelihood of transplantation among pediatric dialysis patients. Pediatr Transplant 16:735–741

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mathur AK, Ashby VB, Sands RL, Wolfe RA (2010) Geographic variation in end-stage renal disease incidence and access to deceased donor kidney transplantation. Am J Transplant 10:1069–1080

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ravanan R, Udayaraj U, Ansell D, Collett D, Johnson R, O’Neill J, Tomson CR, Dudley CR (2010) Variation between centres in access to renal transplantation in UK: longitudinal cohort study. BMJ 341:c3451

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Tizard EJ, Verrina E, van Stralen KJ, Jager KJ (2009) Progress with the European Society for Paediatric Nephrology (ESPN)/ERA-EDTA Registry for children with established renal failure (ERF). Nephrol Dial Transplant 24:2615–2617

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. ERA-EDTA registry (2010) ERA-EDTA Registry Annual Report 2008. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Academic Medical Center, Department of Medical Informatics. Available at: http://www.era-edta-reg.org/files/annualreports/pdf/AnnRep2008.pdf

  15. Turkish Society of Nephrology IT (2009) Registry of the Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation in Turkey, Report 2008. Available at: http://tsn.org.tr/folders/file/registry%20kitap.pdf

  16. Frei U, Schober-Halstenberg HJ (2008) Nierenersatztherapie in Deutschland: Bericht über Dialysebehandlung und Nierentransplantation in Deutschland 2006/2007. Berlin, QuaSi-Niere. Available at: http://www.bundesverband-niere.de/files/QuaSi-Niere-Bericht_2006-2007.pdf

  17. van Stralen KJ, Dekker FW, Zoccali C, Jager KJ (2010) Confounding. Nephron Clin Pract 116:c143–c147

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Harambat J, van Stralen KJ, Kim JJ, Tizard EJ (2012) Epidemiology of chronic kidney disease in children. Pediatr Nephrol 27:363–373

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. U.S.Renal Data System (2008) USRDS 2008 Annual Data Report: Atlas of Chronic Kidney Disease and End-Stage Renal Disease in the United States. In: National Institutes of Health National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, ed. Bethesda, MD, Available at http://www.usrds.org/archive.aspx

  20. Amaral S, Patzer RE, Kutner N, McClellan W (2012) Racial disparities in access to pediatric kidney transplantation since share 35. J Am Soc Nephrol 23:1069–1077

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Nguyen S, Martz K, Stablein D, Neu A (2011) Wait list status of pediatric dialysis patients in North America. Pediatr Transplant 15:376–383

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

JH was supported by an ERA-EDTA QUEST initiative research fund and received travel assistance from Astellas Pharma, Fresenius Medical Care, Pfizer, and Sandoz.

We are very grateful to the following persons and registries for their participation in the data collection of this study:

Austria: R. Kramar (Austrian Dialysis and Transplant Registry); Belarus: S. Baiko (Department of Pediatrics, Minsk University Hospital); Belgium: K. van Hoeck and A. Raes (Belgian Pediatric Nephrology Registry); Bulgaria: D. Roussinov (Department of Pediatrics, Sofia University Hospital); Croatia: Z. Puretic (Department of Pediatrics, Zagreb University Hospital); Czech Republic: T Seeman (Department of Pediatrics, Prague University Hospital); Denmark: J. Heaf (Danish Renal Registry), SS. Sorensen (Department of Nephrology, Copenhagen University Hospital); Estonia: U. Toots (Department of Pediatrics, Tallin University Hospital); Eurotransplant International: V. Diepeveen-Huijsman, I. Tieken, A. Rahmel and J. de Boer; Finland: P. Finne (Finnish Registry for Kidney Diseases); France: MA. Macher (Biomedicine Agency); FYROM: N. Ristoska-Bojkovska (Department of Pediatrics, Skopje University Hospital); Germany: B. Tönshoff (CERTAIN Registry); Greece: G.A. Ioannidis (Hellenic Renal Registry); Hungary: G. Reusz (Department of Pediatrics, Semmelweis University Hospital Budapest); Iceland: V. Edvardsson (Department of Pediatrics, Reykjavik University Hospital); Italy: E. Verrina, L. Dello Strologo, S. Testa (Italian Registry of Pediatric Chronic Dialysis); Lithuania: A. Jankauskiene (Department of Pediatrics, Vilnius University Hospital); Norway: T. Leivestad (Norwegian Renal Registry); Poland: R. Grenda and J. Rubik (Department of Pediatric Nephrology, Children’s Memorial Health Institute); Portugal: C. Mota (Department of Pediatric Nephrology, Porto University Hospital); Romania: L. Garneata (Romanian Renal Registry); Russia: EA. Molchanova (Russian Pediatric RRT Registry); Serbia: M. Kostic (Department of Pediatric Nephrology, Belgrade University Hospital); Slovakia: G. Kolvek (Department of Pediatrics, Kosice University Hospital); Slovenia: G. Novljan (Department of Pediatrics, Ljubljana University Hospital); Sweden: KG. Prütz (Swedish Transplant registry), S. Hansson (Department of Pediatrics, Göteborg University Hospital); Switzerland: GF. Laube (Department of Pediatrics, Zurich University Hospital); Spain: A. Alonso Melgar (Spanish Pediatric Renal Registry); the Netherlands: AC. Hemke (Dutch End Stage Renal Disease Registry); Turkey: R. Topaloglu (Department of Pediatrics, Hacettepe University Hospital Ankara); Ukraine: D. Ivanov (Department of Pediatrics, Kiev University Hospital); United Kingdom: H. Maxwell (UK Renal Registry).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jérôme Harambat.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Harambat, J., van Stralen, K.J., Verrina, E. et al. Likelihood of children with end-stage kidney disease in Europe to live with a functioning kidney transplant is mainly explained by nonmedical factors. Pediatr Nephrol 29, 453–459 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-013-2665-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-013-2665-7

Keywords

Navigation