Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Newly designed retraction devices for intestine control during laparoscopic aortic surgery

A comparative study in an animal model

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Recent clinical studies have demonstrated the feasibility of laparoscopic surgery for aortic occlusive and aneurysmal disease. However, transperitoneal aortic access is compromised by poor exposure in the operative field from uncontrolled bowel. The retractors that are currently available are inadequate for this task. The development of new retractors would help to facilitate laparoscopic aortic surgery.

Methods

Six female piglets (28–30 kg) in each group underwent laparoscopy with pneumoperitoneum (12 mmHg). Exposure of the infrarenal aorta and cross-clamping were undertaken through a transperitoneal approach. Two paddles inserted in a polyester bilayer (mobile device, group A) or a mesh net fixed to the abdominal wall (fixed device, group B) were used to retain the bowel. Aortotomy and suturing were performed to mimic a vascular procedure. After bleeding was controlled, the intraabdominal pressure (IAP) was lowered to 6 mmHg, and retraction was assessed for 30 min. The main outcome measures were time to deploy the retractors, time to perform the vascular procedure, time to withdraw the devices, and total procedural time. Blood loss and frequency of retraction failure were also recorded.

Results

Mean time to deploy the device was 22±12 min in group A and 36±34 min in group B (n.s.). Vascular surgery time averaged 60±24 min in group A and 68±16 min in group B (n.s.). The times to withdraw the nets were 3.6±1.2 min and 13.5±8.2 min, respectively (p<0.05). Total surgery time was 155±41 min vs 174±49 min (n.s.). There were six retraction failures, five in group A and one in group B. When lower IAP was used, there was only one failure in each study group. Mean blood loss was <150 ml in both groups. There were no major complications.

Conclusions

Both methods provided adequate exposure of the infrarenal aorta. Vascular surgery time and blood loss were similar for both groups. The movable device proved more usable and, at lower IAP, more effective. The results of this study demonstrate effective bowel retraction for laparoscopic aortic surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ahn SS, Clem MF, Braithwaite BD, Concepcion B, Petrik PV, Moore WS (1995) Laparoscopic aortofemoral bypass: initial experience in an animal model [Comments]. Ann Surg 222: 677–683

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Barbera L, Kemen M, Zumtobel V, Mumme A (1999) Die laparoskopische Anlage aortobifemoraler Bypässe: eine neue Technik für ein bewährtes gefäßchirurgisches Rekonstruktionsverfahren. Gefäßchirurgie 4: 34–39

    Google Scholar 

  3. Barbera L, Mumme A, Senkal M, Zumtobel V, Kemen M (1998) Operative results and outcome of twenty-four totally laparoscopic vascular procedures for aortoiliac occlusive disease. J Vasc Surg 28: 136–142

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bruns CJ, Wolfgarten B, Kasper M, Zenner D, Walter M, Manich B (1997) Gasless videoendoscopic implantation of aortobifemoral vascular prostheses via a transperitoneal approach—an animal experiment. Vasa 26: 102–109

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Byrne J, Hallett JWJ, Kollmorgen CF, Gayari MM, Davies W (1996) Totally laparoscopic aortobifemoral bypass grafting in an experimental model: description of technique with initial surgical results. Ann Vasc Surg 10: 156–165

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Cuschieri A (1998) Adverse cardiovascular changes induced by positive pressure pneumoperitoneum. Surg Endosc 12: 93–94

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Dion YM, Gracia C, Estakhri M, Demalsy JC, Douville Y, Piccinini E, Stancanelli V (1998) Totally laparoscopic aortobifemoral bypass. Surg Laparosc Endosc 8: 165–170

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Dion YM, Katkhouda N, Rouleau C, Aucoin A (1993) Laparoscopy-assisted aortobifemoral bypass. Surg Laparosc Endosc 3: 425–429

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Dion YM, Levesque C, Doillon CJ (1995) Experimental carbon dioxide pulmonary embolization after vena cava laceration under pneumoperitoneum. Surg Endosc 9: 1065–1069

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Edoga JK, Asgarian K, Singh D, James KV, Romanelli J, Merchant S, Romano D, Joostema B, Street J (1998) Laparoscopic surgery for abdominal aortic aneurysms. Surg Endosc 12: 1064–1072

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Paolucci V, Schaeff B, Gutt CN, Litynski GS (1997) Exposure of the operative field in laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 11: 856–863

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barbera, L., Ludemann, R., Grossefeld, M. et al. Newly designed retraction devices for intestine control during laparoscopic aortic surgery. Surg Endosc 14, 63–66 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/s004649900013

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s004649900013

Key words

Navigation