Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Endoscopic resection as the first-line treatment for early colorectal cancer: comparison with surgery

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Endoscopic resection has emerged as an alternative therapeutic option for selected cases of early colorectal cancer. However, even now, few data are available on the comparative effectiveness of endoscopic versus surgical resection of early colorectal cancer. The aim of our study was to compare the clinical outcomes in patients with early colorectal cancer who underwent endoscopic resection and those who underwent surgical resection.

Methods

292 early colorectal cancer lesions in 287 patients who were treated with either endoscopic resection or colorectal surgery (open or laparoscopic colorectal resection) between January 2005 and December 2010 were retrospectively analyzed. After excluding 54 deep submucosal lesions [and/or tumor budding (Grade 2 or 3)], a total of 168 lesions with mucosal/superficial submucosal invasion were treated by endoscopic resection, and 70 lesions with mucosal/superficial submucosal invasion were treated by colorectal surgery.

Results

In the endoscopic resection group, the en bloc resection rate and the complete resection rate were 91.1 and 91.1 %, respectively. In the colorectal surgery group, both the en bloc resection rate and the curative resection rate were 100 %. However, using Log rank test in Kaplan–Meier curve, no significant difference in recurrence rate (including metachronous cancer) during the median follow-up period of 37 months (range, 6–98 months) was observed between the two groups (p = 0.647). In addition, a similar morbidity rate was observed for endoscopic resection compared with surgery (5.4 vs. 5.7 %, p = 0.760). A significantly shorter hospital stay was observed in the endoscopic resection group than colorectal surgery group [median 2 days (range, 2–29) vs. median 10 days (range, 7–37), p < 0.001).

Conclusion

We suggest that endoscopic resection, being equally effective but less invasive than surgery, can be the first-line treatment for well selected early colorectal cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hyodo I, Suzuki H, Takahashi K, Saito Y, Tanaka S, Chiu HM, Kim NK, Li J, Lim R, Villalon A, Boku N (2010) Present status and perspectives of colorectal cancer in Asia: Colorectal Cancer Working Group report in 30th Asia-Pacific Cancer Conference. Jpn J Clin Oncol 40(Suppl 1):i38–i43

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Zavoral M, Suchanek S, Zavada F, Dusek L, Muzik J, Seifert B, Fric P (2009) Colorectal cancer screening in Europe. World J Gastroenterol 15:5907–5915

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kobayashi H, Mochizuki H, Morita T, Kotake K, Teramoto T, Kameoka S, Saito Y, Takahashi K, Hase K, Oya M, Maeda K, Hirai T, Kameyama M, Shirouzu K, Sugihara K (2011) Characteristics of recurrence after curative resection for T1 colorectal cancer: Japanese multicenter study. J Gastroenterol 46:203–211

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Tanaka S, Yokota T, Saito D, Okamoto S, Oguro Y, Yoshida S (1995) Clinicopathologic features of early rectal carcinoma and indications for endoscopic treatment. Dis Colon Rectum 38:959–963

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Nakadoi K, Tanaka S, Kanao H, Terasaki M, Takata S, Oka S, Yoshida S, Arihiro K, Chayama K (2012) Management of T1 colorectal carcinoma with special reference to criteria for curative endoscopic resection. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 27:1057–1062

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Repici A, Pellicano R, Strangio G, Danese S, Fagoonee S, Malesci A (2009) Endoscopic mucosal resection for early colorectal neoplasia: pathologic basis, procedures, and outcomes. Dis Colon Rectum 52:1502–1515

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kudo S (1993) Endoscopic mucosal resection of flat and depressed types of early colorectal cancer. Endoscopy 25:455–461

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Rosenberg N (1955) Submucosal saline wheal as safety factor in fulguration or rectal and sigmoidal polypi. AMA Arch Surg 70:120–122

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kudo S, Kashida H, Nakajima T, Tamura S, Nakajo K (1997) Endoscopic diagnosis and treatment of early colorectal cancer. World J Surg 21:694–701

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rembacken BJ, Gotoda T, Fujii T, Axon AT (2001) Endoscopic mucosal resection. Endoscopy 33:709–718

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Tanaka S, Haruma K, Oka S, Takahashi R, Kunihiro M, Kitadai Y, Yoshihara M, Shimamoto F, Chayama K (2001) Clinicopathologic features and endoscopic treatment of superficially spreading colorectal neoplasms larger than 20 mm. Gastrointest Endosc 54:62–66

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Yokota T, Sugihara K, Yoshida S (1994) Endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal neoplastic lesions. Dis Colon Rectum 37:1108–1111

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bergmann U, Beger HG (2003) Endoscopic mucosal resection for advanced non-polypoid colorectal adenoma and early stage carcinoma. Surg Endosc 17:475–479

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bories E, Pesenti C, Monges G, Lelong B, Moutardier V, Delpero JR, Giovannini M (2006) Endoscopic mucosal resection for advanced sessile adenoma and early-stage colorectal carcinoma. Endoscopy 38:231–235

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Shinya H, Cooperman A, Wolff WI (1982) A rationale for the endoscopic management of colonic polyps. Surg Clin North Am 62:861–867

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Christie JP (1988) Polypectomy or colectomy? Management of 106 consecutively encountered colorectal polyps. Am Surg 54:93–99

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kyzer S, Begin LR, Gordon PH, Mitmaker B (1992) The care of patients with colorectal polyps that contain invasive adenocarcinoma. Endoscopic polypectomy or colectomy? Cancer 70:2044–2050

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Minamoto T, Mai M, Ogino T, Sawaguchi K, Ohta T, Fujimoto T, Takahashi Y (1993) Early invasive colorectal carcinomas metastatic to the lymph node with attention to their nonpolypoid development. Am J Gastroenterol 88:1035–1039

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Tanaka S, Haruma K, Teixeira CR, Tatsuta S, Ohtsu N, Hiraga Y, Yoshihara M, Sumii K, Kajiyama G, Shimamoto F (1995) Endoscopic treatment of submucosal invasive colorectal carcinoma with special reference to risk factors for lymph node metastasis. J Gastroenterol 30:710–717

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Yoda Y, Ikematsu H, Matsuda T, Yamaguchi Y, Hotta K, Kobayashi N, Fujii T, Oono Y, Sakamoto T, Nakajima T, Takao M, Shinohara T, Fujimori T, Kaneko K, Saito Y (2013) A large-scale multicenter study of long-term outcomes after endoscopic resection for submucosal invasive colorectal cancer. Endoscopy 45:718–724

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lacy AM, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, Castells A, Taura P, Pique JM, Visa J (2002) Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet 359:2224–2229

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Weeks JC, Nelson H, Gelber S, Sargent D, Schroeder G (2002) Short-term quality-of-life outcomes following laparoscopic-assisted colectomy vs open colectomy for colon cancer: a randomized trial. JAMA 287:321–328

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lourenco T, Murray A, Grant A, McKinley A, Krukowski Z, Vale L (2008) Laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: safe and effective? - A systematic review. Surg Endosc 22:1146–1160

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Leung KL, Kwok SP, Lam SC, Lee JF, Yiu RY, Ng SS, Lai PB, Lau WY (2004) Laparoscopic resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma: prospective randomised trial. Lancet 363:1187–1192

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350:2050–2059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC, Jeekel J, Kazemier G, Bonjer HJ, Haglind E, Pahlman L, Cuesta MA, Msika S, Morino M, Lacy AM (2005) Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 6:477–484

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kobayashi H, Mochizuki H, Sugihara K, Morita T, Kotake K, Teramoto T, Kameoka S, Saito Y, Takahashi K, Hase K, Oya M, Maeda K, Hirai T, Kameyama M, Shirouzu K, Muto T (2007) Characteristics of recurrence and surveillance tools after curative resection for colorectal cancer: a multicenter study. Surgery 141:67–75

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosures

Drs. Jun Heo, Seong Woo Jeon, Min Kyu Jung, Sung Kook Kim have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seong Woo Jeon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Heo, J., Jeon, S.W., Jung, M.K. et al. Endoscopic resection as the first-line treatment for early colorectal cancer: comparison with surgery. Surg Endosc 28, 3435–3442 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3618-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3618-3

Keywords

Navigation