Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Laparoscopy impacts outcomes favorably following colectomy for ulcerative colitis: a critical analysis of the ACS-NSQIP database

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

The surgical management of ulcerative colitis (UC) often involves complex operations. We investigated the outcome of patients who underwent surgery for UC by analyzing a nationwide database.

Methods

We queried the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database (ACS-NSQIP, 2005–2008) for all UC patients who underwent colectomy. To analyze by operation, groupings included: partial colectomy (PC; n = 265), total abdominal colectomy (TAC; n = 232), total proctocolectomy with ileostomy (TPC-I; n = 134), and total proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA; n = 446) to analyze 30-day outcomes.

Results

From 1,077 patients (mean age, 44 years; 45 % female; 7 % emergent), a laparoscopic approach was used in 29.2 %, with rates increasing 8.5 % each year (18.5 % in 2005 to 41.3 % in 2008, P < 0.001). Complications occurred in 29 %, and laparoscopy was associated with a lower complication rate (21 vs. 32 % open, P < 0.001). On multivariate regression, postoperative complications increased when patients were not functionally independent [odds ratio (OR) = 3.2], had preoperative sepsis (OR = 2.0), or prior percutaneous coronary intervention (OR = 2.8). A laparoscopic approach was associated with a lower complication rate (OR = 0.63). When stratified by specific complications, laparoscopy was associated with lower complications, including superficial surgical site infections (11.4 vs. 6.7 %, P = 0.0011), pneumonia (2.9 vs. 0.6 %, P = 0.023), prolonged mechanical ventilation (3.9 vs. 1.3 %, P = 0.023), need for transfusions postoperatively (1.6 vs. 0 %, P = 0.016), and severe sepsis (2.9 vs. 1.0 %, P = 0.039). Laparoscopy was also was associated with a lower complication rate in TACs (41.7 vs. 18.8 %, P < 0.0001) and IPAA (29.9 vs. 18.2 %, P = 0.005) and had an overall lower mortality rate (0.2 vs. 1.7 %, P = 0.046).

Conclusions

Results from a large nationwide database demonstrate that a laparoscopic approach was utilized in an increasing number of UC patients undergoing colectomy and was associated with lower morbidity and mortality, even in more complex procedures, such as TAC and IPAA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tan JJ, Tjandra JJ (2006) Laparoscopic surgery for ulcerative colitis: a meta-analysis. Colorectal Dis 8:626–636

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Wexner SD, Cera SM (2005) Laparoscopic surgery for ulcerative colitis [review]. Surg Clin North Am 85:35–47 viii

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Casillas S, Delaney CP (2005) Laparoscopic surgery for inflammatory bowel disease. Dig Surg 22:135–142

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Polle SW, Dunker MS, Slors JF, Sprangers MA, Cuesta MA, Gouma DJ, Bemelman WA (2007) Body image, cosmesis, quality of life, and functional outcome of hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open restorative proctocolectomy: long-term results of a randomized trial. Surg Endosc 21:1301–1307

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Dunker MS, Bemelman WA, Slors JF, van Duijvendijk P, Gouma DJ (2001) Functional outcome, quality of life, body image, and cosmesis in patients after laparoscopic-assisted and conventional restorative proctocolectomy: a comparative study. Dis Colon Rectum 44:1800–1807

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Merkow RP, Bilimoria KY, McCarter MD, Bentrem DJ (2009) Effect of body mass index on short-term outcomes after colectomy for cancer. J Am Coll Surg 208:53–61

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Khuri SF, Daley J, Henderson W, Hur K, Demakis J, Aust JB, Chong V, Fabri PJ, Gibbs JO, Grover F, Hammermeister K, Irvin G 3rd, McDonald G, Passaro E Jr, Phillips L, Scamman F, Spencer J, Stremple JF (1998) The Department of Veterans Affairs’ NSQIP: the first national, validated, outcome-based, risk-adjusted, and peer-controlled program for the measurement and enhancement of the quality of surgical care. National VA Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Ann Surg 228:491–507

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. NSQIP (2011) About ACS-NSQIP: participating sites; ACS NSQIP data; participant use data file. Available at: http://www.acsnsqip.org/main/puf/PufRequestHomepage.jsp. Accessed 24 July 2011

  9. Kim J, Cho JN, Joo SH, Kim BS, Lee SM (2012) Multivariable analysis of cholecystectomy after gastrectomy: laparoscopy is a feasible initial approach even in the presence of common bile duct stones or acute cholecystitis. World J Surg 36:638–644

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Masoomi H, Nguyen NT, Dolich MO, Wikholm L, Naderi N, Mills S, Stamos MJ (2011) Comparison of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for acute nonperforated and perforated appendicitis in the obese population. Am J Surg 202:733–738 discussion 738–739

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Holubar SD, Privitera A, Cima RR, Dozois EJ, Pemberton JH, Larson DW (2009) Minimally invasive total proctocolectomy with Brooke ileostomy for ulcerative colitis. Inflamm Bowel Dis 15:1337–1342

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Peters WR (1992) Laparoscopic total proctocolectomy with creation of ileostomy for ulcerative colitis: report of two cases. J Laparoendosc Surg 2:175–178

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Thibault C, Poulin EC (1995) Total laparoscopic proctocolectomy and laparoscopy-assisted proctocolectomy for inflammatory bowel disease: operative technique and preliminary report. Surg Laparosc Endosc 5:472–476

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Liu CD, Rolandelli R, Ashley SW, Evans B, Shin M, McFadden DW (1995) Laparoscopic surgery for inflammatory bowel disease. Am Surg 61:1054–1056

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Fichera A, Zoccali M (2012) Single-incision laparoscopic total abdominal colectomy for refractory ulcerative colitis. Surg Endosc 26:862–868

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Pedraza R, Patel CB, Ramos-Valadez DI, Haas EM (2011) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery for restorative proctocolectomy with ileal J pouch-anal anastomosis. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 20:234–239

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Fichera A, Zoccali M, Felice C, Rubin DT (2011) Total abdominal colectomy for refractory ulcerative colitis. Surgical treatment in evolution. J Gastrointest Surg 15:1909–1916

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Flores P, Bailez MM, Cuenca E, Fraire C (2010) Comparative analysis between laparoscopic (UCL) and open (UCO) technique for the treatment of ulcerative colitis in pediatric patients. Pediatr Surg Int 26:907–911

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Telem DA, Vine AJ, Swain G, Divino CM, Salky B, Greenstein AJ, Harris M, Katz LB (2010) Laparoscopic subtotal colectomy for medically refractory ulcerative colitis: the time has come. Surg Endosc 24:1616–1620

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Ethical standards

This paper has been approved by the Madigan Army Medical Center Human Use Institutional Review Board.

Disclosures

Authors Marlin W. Causey, Doug stoddard, Eric K. Johnson, Justin A. Maykel, Mathew J. Martin, David Rivadeneira and Scott R. Steele have no conflict of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marlin W. Causey.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Causey, M.W., Stoddard, D., Johnson, E.K. et al. Laparoscopy impacts outcomes favorably following colectomy for ulcerative colitis: a critical analysis of the ACS-NSQIP database. Surg Endosc 27, 603–609 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2498-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2498-7

Keywords

Navigation