Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparison in prognosis after VATS lobectomy and open lobectomy for stage I lung cancer

Retrospective analysis focused on a histological subgroup

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) has become an attractive surgical procedure, but several issues remain to be resolved. Prognosis after VATS lobectomy is important to evaluate the adequacy of VATS lobectomy as a cancer operation. Interestingly, several investigators, including us, have reported that prognosis after VATS lobectomy was superior to that after open lobectomy in early non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). One of the possible reasons is the low invasiveness of VATS lobectomy. But we considered that patient bias might have some influence favoring VATS lobectomy. To evaluate our hypothesis, we reviewed medical records of stage I NSCLC patients undergoing operation between 1993 and 2002. We compared and evaluated the relationship between patient characteristics and prognosis after VATS and open lobectomy. We focused particularly on histological type, classifying it into four subgroups; (1) bronchioloalveolar carcinoma (BAC), (2) mixed BAC + papillary adenocarcinoma (BAC + Pap), (3) other adenocarcinoma (Other adeno), (4) squamous cell carcinoma + others (Sq +others).

Results

A total of 165 patients underwent VATS lobectomy, and 123 patients underwent open lobectomy. The 5-year survival rate of the VATS lobectomy group was 94.5% and that of the open lobectomy group was 81.5%. Univariate Cox regression of survival revealed that male, CEA > 5, Other adeno, Sq + others, open lobectomy, and tumor size > 3 cm were significant negative prognostic variables. Multivariate Cox regression of survival revealed that histological subtype and tumor size were independent prognostic factors, but surgical procedure was not an independent prognostic factor.

Comments

Prognosis after VATS lobectomy was superior to that after open lobectomy, but patient bias influenced the prognosis in favor of VATS lobectomy, and the surgical procedure itself was not a prognostic factor.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cole FH Jr, Cole FH, Khandekar A, Maxwell JM, Pate JW, Walker WA (1995) Video-assisted thoracic surgery: primary therapy for spontaneous pneumothorax? Ann Thorac Surg 60:931–933; discussion 934–935

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gharagozloo F, Tempesta B, Margolis M, Alexander EP (2003) Video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy for stage I lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 76:1009–1014; discussion 1014–1005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Giudicelli R, Thomas P, Lonjon T, Ragni J, Morati N, Ottomani R, Fuentes PA, Shennib H, Noirclerc M (1994) Video-assisted minithoracotomy versus muscle-sparing thoracotomy for performing lobectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 58:712–717; discussion 717–718

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Iwasaki A, Shirakusa T, Shiraishi T, Yamamoto S (2004) Results of video-assisted thoracic surgery for stage I/II non-small cell lung cancer. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 26:158–164

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kaseda S, Aoki T, Hangai N, Shimizu K (2000) Better pulmonary function and prognosis with video-assisted thoracic surgery than with thoracotomy. Ann Thorac Surg 70:1644–1646

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kirby TJ, Mack MJ, Landreneau RJ, Rice TW (1995) Lobectomy—video-assisted thoracic surgery versus muscle-sparing thoracotomy. A randomized trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 109:997–1001; discussion 1001–1002

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kirby TJ, Rice TW (1993) Thoracoscopic lobectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 56: 784–786

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Levi JF, Kleinmann P, Riquet M, Debesse B (1990) Percutaneous parietal pleurectomy for recurrent spontaneous pneumothorax. Lancet 336:1577–1578

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lewis RJ, Caccavale RJ (1998) Video-assisted thoracic surgical non-rib spreading simultaneously stapled lobectomy (VATS(n)SSL). Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 10:332–339

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. McKenna RJ Jr (2005) New approaches to the minimally invasive treatment of lung cancer. Cancer J 11:73–76

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. McKenna RJ Jr, Wolf RK, Brenner M, Fischel RJ, Wurnig P (1998) Is lobectomy by video-assisted thoracic surgery an adequate cancer operation? Ann Thorac Surg 66:1903–1907

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nagahiro I, Andou A, Aoe M, Sano Y, Date H, Shimizu N (2001) Pulmonary function, postoperative pain, and serum cytokine level after lobectomy: a comparison of VATS and conventional procedure. Ann Thorac Surg 72:362–365

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Nakata M, Saeki H, Yokoyama N, Kurita A, Takiyama W, Takashima S (2000) Pulmonary function after lobectomy: video-assisted thoracic surgery versus thoracotomy. Ann Thorac Surg 70:938–941

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Roviaro G, Varoli F, Rebuffat C, Vergani C, D’hoore A, Scalambra SM, Maciocco M, Grignani F (1993) Major pulmonary resections: pneumonectomies and lobectomies. Ann Thorac Surg 56:779–783

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Roviaro G, Varoli F, Vergani C, Nucca O, Maciocco M, Grignani F (2004) Long-term survival after videothoracoscopic lobectomy for stage I lung cancer. Chest 126:25–732

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sawada S, Watanabe Y, Moriyama S (2005) Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for primary spontaneous pneumothorax: evaluation of indications and long-term outcome compared with conservative treatment and open thoracotomy. Chest 127:2226–2230

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sugi K, Kaneda Y, Esato K (2000) Video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy achieves a satisfactory long-term prognosis in patients with clinical stage IA lung cancer. World J Surg 24:27–30; discussion 30–21

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Yim AP, Wan S, Lee TW, Arifi AA (2000) VATS lobectomy reduces cytokine responses compared with conventional surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 70:243–247

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Sawada.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sawada, S., Komori, E., Yamashita, M. et al. Comparison in prognosis after VATS lobectomy and open lobectomy for stage I lung cancer. Surg Endosc 21, 1607–1611 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-007-9200-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-007-9200-5

Keywords

Navigation