Use of Arterial Oxygen Saturation, Heart Rate, and Blood Pressure as Indirect Objective Physiologic Markers to Predict Aspiration

Abstract

If an indirect bedside variable can reliably predict whether an objective instrumental dysphagia evaluation is needed, time and money can be saved without compromising patient care. To date, the search for a reliable indirect subjective marker of aspiration has not been successful. However, research on indirect objective markers of aspiration is alluring. The purpose of the present study was to investigate changes, if any, in the physiologic parameters of arterial oxygen saturation (SpO₂), heart rate, and blood pressure during simultaneous objective confirmation of aspiration status with Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES®). Sixty adult subjects were divided into 4 groups of 15. Group 1 did not require supplemental oxygen and did not aspirate. Group 2 did not require supplemental oxygen and exhibited aspiration. Group 3 required supplemental oxygen and did not aspirate. Group 4 required supplemental oxygen and exhibited aspiration. Simultaneous SpO₂, heart rate, and blood pressure measurements were collected at 1-min intervals, i.e., pre-FEES baseline for 5 min; during FEES; and post-FEES for 5 min. Results indicated no significant differences in SpO₂ levels based on aspiration status or oxygen requirements for any of the 4 groups. A consistent pattern of higher heart rate values during FEES and continuing for 5 min post-FEES was observed for all 4 groups. A consistent pattern of higher blood pressure values during FEES and then lower blood pressure values post-FEES was observed for all 4 groups. It was concluded that the use of changes in SpO₂, heart rate, or blood pressure values as indirect objective markers of aspiration was not supported.