Abstract
The modified barium swallow (MBS) study is a videofluoroscopic evaluation of oropharyngeal swallow function. Esophageal imaging is not routinely performed during an MBS, and few guidelines for implementation or interpretation exist. Aims of the current investigation were to (1) delineate the percentage of normal, oropharyngeal, esophageal, and mixed swallowing dysfunction, (2) develop operational definitions for rating our standardization cursory view of esophageal bolus flow, and (3) determine inter-rater reliability between speech pathology (SLP) and physician raters for categorizing esophageal abnormalities. A two-phase retrospective review of 358 patient charts and MBS studies was conducted. Esophageal bolus flow was operationally defined as (1) normal, (2) anatomic abnormality, (3) dysmotility and (4) combined. Descriptive statistics, a Chi square with alpha set at 0.05, and Kappa analysis were performed. Esophageal dysfunction was identified in 80 (26%) patients and included: anatomic abnormality (69%), dysmotility (17%), and combined abnormality (14%). Phase one reliability testing yielded fair agreement between SLP and MD raters k = 0.5. Following revision of definitions and consensus training, phase two reliability testing resulted in excellent agreement between the same raters k = 0.9. Multiphase or primary esophageal dysphagia was found in 26% of our sample using a standardized protocol rating esophageal bolus flow from the upper esophageal sphincter through the lower esophageal sphincter during the MBS. Improved agreement between SLP and MD raters after definition revision and training suggests these operational definitions are concise, objective and reliable. An expanded MBS study may lead to early identification of esophageal disorders, encourage multidisciplinary patient care, and improve patient health outcomes.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Logemann JA. Manual for the videofluorographic study of swallowing. 1993: Pro-Ed.
Jones B, et al. Pharyngeal findings in 21 patients with achalasia of the esophagus. Dysphagia. 1987;2:87–92.
Borgström PS, Olsson R, Sundkvist G, Ekberg O. Pharyngeal and oesophageal function in patients with diabetes mellitus and swallowing complaints. Br J Radiol. 1987;61(729):817–21.
Montesi A, et al. Oropharyngeal and esophageal function in scleroderma. Dysphagia. 1991;6:219–23.
Mendell DA, Logemann JA. A retrospective analysis of the pharyngeal swallow in patients with a clinical diagnosis of GERD compared with normal controls: a pilot study. Dysphagia. 2002;17(3):220–6.
Sivit CJ, et al. Pharyngeal swallow in gastroesophageal reflux disease. Dysphagia. 1988;2:151–5.
Henderson RD, Woolf C, Marryatt G. Pharyngoesophageal dysphagia and gastroesophageal reflux. Laryngoscope. 1976;86(10):1531–9.
Leopold NA, Kagel MC. Pharyngo-esophageal dysphagia in Parkinson’s disease. Dysphagia. 1997;12:11–8.
Castell JA, et al. Manometric abnormalities of the oesophagus in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2001;13:361–4.
Roeder BE, Murry JA, Dierkhising RA. Patient localization of esophageal dysphagia. Dig Dis Sci. 2004;49(4):697–701.
Edwards D. Discriminitive information in the diagnosis of dysphagia. JR Coll Phys Lond. 1975;9:257–63.
Wilcox CM, Alexander LN, Clark WS. Localization of an obstructing esophageal lesion: is the patient accurate? Dig Dis Sci. 1995;40(10):2192–6.
Smith DF, Ott DJ, Gelfand DW, Chen MY. Lower esophageal mucosal ring: correlation of referred symptoms with radiographic findings using a marshmallow bolus. Am J Roentgenol. 1998;171:1361–5.
Farwell DG, et al. Esophageal pathology in patients after treatment for head and neck cancer. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010;143(3):375–8.
Triadafilopoulos G, et al. Oropharyngeal and esophageal interrelationships in patients with nonobstructive dysphagia. Dig Dis Sci. 1992;37(4):551–7.
Gullung JL, Hill EG, Castell DO, Bonnie Martin-Harris B. Oropharyngeal and esophageal swallowing impairments: their association and the predictive value of the modified barium swallow impairment profile and combined multichannel intraluminal impedance-esophageal manometry. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2012;121(11):738–45.
Lever TE, et al. The effect of an effortful swallow on the normal adult esophagus. Dysphagia. 2007;22(4):312–25.
Malagelada J, et al. World gastroenterology organisation global guidelines: dysphagia—global guidelines and cascades update September 2014. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2015;49(5):370–8.
Martin-Harris B, et al. MBS measurement tool for swallow impairment-MBSImp: establishing a standard. Dysphagia. 2008;23(4):392–405.
Gullung JL, et al. Oropharyngeal and esophageal swallowing impairments: their association and the predictive value of the modified barium swallow impairment profile and combined multichannel intraluminal impedance-esophageal manometry. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2012;121(11):738–45.
Miles A, et al. Esophageal swallowing timing measures in healthy adults during videofluoroscopy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2016;125(9):764–9.
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2002). Knowledge and skills needed by speech-language pathologists providing services to individuals with swallowing and/or feeding disorders [Knowledge and Skills]. Available from http://www.asha.org/policy.%5D.
Allen JE, et al. Comparison of esophageal screen findings on videofluoroscopy with full esophagram results. Head Neck. 2012;34(2):264–9.
Miles A, McMillan J, Ward K, Allen J. Esophageal visualization as an adjunct to the videofluoroscopic study of Swallowing. Head Neck Surg. 2015;152(3):488–93.
American College of Radiology. ACR practice parameter for the performance of esophagrams and upper gastrointestinal examinations in adults. 2013. https://www.acr.org/-/media/ACR/Files/Practice-Parameters/uppergiadults.pdf. Accessed June 2015.
Miles A. Inter-rater reliability for speech-language therapists’ judgement of oesophageal abnormality during oesophageal visualization. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2016;52(4):1–6.
Levine MS, Rubesin SE, Laufer IL. Barium studies in modern radiology: do they have a role. Radiology. 2009;250(1):18–22.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Author Contributions
SW Study concept and design; acquisition of data; drafting of the manuscript; statistical analysis, JG Data analysis, manuscript preparation, JJ Data analysis, JR Study concept and design, study supervision; critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Watts, S., Gaziano, J., Jacobs, J. et al. Improving the Diagnostic Capability of the Modified Barium Swallow Study Through Standardization of an Esophageal Sweep Protocol. Dysphagia 34, 34–42 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-018-09966-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-018-09966-5