Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Factors associated with fatal outcome in posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome: a retrospective analysis of the Berlin PRES study

  • Original Communication
  • Published:
Journal of Neurology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although often reversible, fatal outcome in posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) is well known. However, data on predictors of PRES-associated in-hospital death are scarce. In this study, we aimed to investigate predictors of in-hospital death in a large cohort. Radiological report databases between January 1999 and February 2015 were retrospectively searched for patients with PRES. Patients were included if they met criteria for PRES after detailed investigation of clinical charts and imaging studies. Various clinical, paraclinical and brain MRI data as well as data on in-hospital mortality were analyzed. 151 patients were included into the study, 64% were female. Seventeen (11.2%) patients died during hospital stay. In univariate analyses, higher age (p = 0.04), higher levels of C-reactive protein (p < 0.001), etiology of PRES (sepsis and chemotherapy; p = 0.02), altered coagulation (p = 0.002), altered mental state at onset (p = 0.03), and subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH; p = 0.01) were related to in-hospital death. In multivariate analyses adjusted for age and sex, elevated CRP levels (OR 1.1 95% CI 1.1–1.2), altered coagulation (OR 5.1 95% CI 1.8–14.7), subarachnoid hemorrhage (OR 10.1 95% CI 2.2–46.1) and altered mental state (OR 3.3; 95% CI 1.1–9.4) were independently associated with in-hospital death. Altered mental state, subarachnoid hemorrhage as well as the higher levels of CRP and altered coagulation were significantly more frequent in patients who died in hospital. However, prospective studies are warranted to establish predictors of fatality in patients with PRES.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hinchey J, Chaves C, Appignani B, Breen J, Pao L, Wang A, Pessin MS, Lamy C, Mas JL, Caplan LR (1996) A reversible posterior leukoencephalopathy syndrome. N Engl J Med 334(8):494–500. doi:10.1056/NEJM199602223340803

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lee VH, Wijdicks EF, Manno EM, Rabinstein AA (2008) Clinical spectrum of reversible posterior leukoencephalopathy syndrome. Arch Neurol 65(2):205–210. doi:10.1001/archneurol.2007.46

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Liman TG, Bohner G, Heuschmann PU, Endres M, Siebert E (2012) The clinical and radiological spectrum of posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome: the retrospective Berlin PRES study. J Neurol 259(1):155–164. doi:10.1007/s00415-011-6152-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bartynski WS, Boardman JF (2007) Distinct imaging patterns and lesion distribution in posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 28(7):1320–1327. doi:10.3174/ajnr.A0549

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bartynski WS (2008) Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome, part 2: controversies surrounding pathophysiology of vasogenic edema. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 29(6):1043–1049. doi:10.3174/ajnr.A0929

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bartynski WS, Boardman JF (2008) Catheter angiography, MR angiography, and MR perfusion in posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome. Am J Neuroradiol 29(3):447–455. doi:10.3174/ajnr.A0839

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fugate JE, Rabinstein AA (2015) Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome: clinical and radiological manifestations, pathophysiology, and outstanding questions. Lancet Neurol 14(9):914–925. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(15)00111-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Neeb L, Hoekstra J, Endres M, Siegerink B, Siebert E, Liman TG (2016) Spectrum of cerebral spinal fluid findings in patients with posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome. J Neurol. doi:10.1007/s00415-015-7928-8

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bartynski WS, Boardman JF, Zeigler ZR, Shadduck RK, Lister J (2006) Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome in infection, sepsis, and shock. Am J Neuroradiol 27(10):2179–2190

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Legriel S, Schraub O, Azoulay E, Hantson P, Magalhaes E, Coquet I, Bretonniere C, Gilhodes O, Anguel N, Megarbane B, Benayoun L, Schnell D, Plantefeve G, Charpentier J, Argaud L, Mourvillier B, Galbois A, Chalumeau-Lemoine L, Rivoal M, Durand F, Geffroy A, Simon M, Stoclin A, Pallot JL, Arbelot C, Nyunga M, Lesieur O, Troche G, Bruneel F, Cordoliani YS, Bedos JP, Pico F (2012) Determinants of recovery from severe posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome. PLoS One 7(9):e44534. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0044534

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Liman TG, Bohner G, Endres M, Siebert E (2014) Discharge status and in-hospital mortality in posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome. Acta Neurol Scand 130(1):34–39. doi:10.1111/ane.12213

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Roth C, Ferbert A (2010) Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome: long-term follow-up. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 81(7):773–777. doi:10.1136/jnnp.2009.189647

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hinchey JA (2008) Reversible posterior leukoencephalopathy syndrome: what have we learned in the last 10 years? Arch Neurol 65(2):175–176. doi:10.1001/archneurol.2007.62

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Alhilali LM, Reynolds AR, Fakhran S (2014) A multi-disciplinary model of risk factors for fatal outcome in posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome. J Neurol Sci 347(1–2):59–65. doi:10.1016/j.jns.2014.09.019

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hinduja A, Habetz K, Raina S, Ramakrishnaiah R, Fitzgerald RT (2016) Predictors of poor outcome in patients with posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome. Int J Neurosci. doi:10.3109/00207454.2016.1152966

    Google Scholar 

  16. Liman TG, Bohner G, Heuschmann PU, Scheel M, Endres M, Siebert E (2012) Clinical and radiological differences in posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome between patients with preeclampsia-eclampsia and other predisposing diseases. Eur J Neurol. doi:10.1111/j.1468-1331.2011.03629

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mueller-Mang C, Mang T, Pirker A, Klein K, Prchla C, Prayer D (2009) Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome: do predisposing risk factors make a difference in MRI appearance? Neuroradiology 51(6):373–383. doi:10.1007/s00234-009-0504-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Junewar V, Verma R, Sankhwar PL, Garg RK, Singh MK, Malhotra HS, Sharma PK, Parihar A (2014) Neuroimaging features and predictors of outcome in eclamptic encephalopathy: a prospective observational study. Am J Neuroradiol 35(9):1728–1734. doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3923

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Choi S, Park K, Ryu S, Kang T, Kim H, Cho S, Oh S (2016) Use of S-100B, NSE, CRP and ESR to predict neurological outcomes in patients with return of spontaneous circulation and treated with hypothermia. Emerg Med J. doi:10.1136/emermed-2015-205423

    Google Scholar 

  20. Di Napoli M, Elkind MS, Godoy DA, Singh P, Papa F, Popa-Wagner A (2011) Role of C-reactive protein in cerebrovascular disease: a critical review. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther 9(12):1565–1584. doi:10.1586/erc.11.159

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Elkind MS, Tai W, Coates K, Paik MC, Sacco RL (2006) High-sensitivity C-reactive protein, lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2, and outcome after ischemic stroke. Arch Intern Med 166(19):2073–2080. doi:10.1001/archinte.166.19.2073

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Matsuo R, Ago T, Hata J, Wakisaka Y, Kuroda J, Kuwashiro T, Kitazono T, Kamouchi M (2016) Plasma C-reactive protein and clinical outcomes after acute ischemic stroke: a prospective observational study. PLoS One 11(6):e0156790. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0156790

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Turner CL, Budohoski K, Smith C, Hutchinson PJ, Kirkpatrick PJ, Murray GD (2015) Elevated baseline C-reactive protein as a predictor of outcome after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: data from the simvastatin in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (STASH) trial. Neurosurgery 77(5):786–792. doi:10.1227/NEU.0000000000000963 (discussion 792–783)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Kuhlmann CR, Librizzi L, Closhen D, Pflanzner T, Lessmann V, Pietrzik CU, de Curtis M, Luhmann HJ (2009) Mechanisms of C-reactive protein-induced blood–brain barrier disruption. Stroke 40(4):1458–1466. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.535930

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hefzy HM, Bartynski WS, Boardman JF, Lacomis D (2009) Hemorrhage in posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome: imaging and clinical features. Am J Neuroradiol 30(7):1371–1379. doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1588

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Sharma A, Whitesell RT, Moran KJ (2010) Imaging pattern of intracranial hemorrhage in the setting of posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome. Neuroradiology 52(10):855–863. doi:10.1007/s00234-009-0632-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. McKinney AM, Short J, Truwit CL, McKinney ZJ, Kozak OS, SantaCruz KS, Teksam M (2007) Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome: incidence of atypical regions of involvement and imaging findings. Am J Roentgenol 189(4):904–912. doi:10.2214/AJR.07.2024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Moon SN, Jeon SJ, Choi SS, Song CJ, Chung GH, Yu IK, Kim DH (2013) Can clinical and MRI findings predict the prognosis of variant and classical type of posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES)? Acta Radiol 54(10):1182–1190. doi:10.1177/0284185113491252

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eberhard Siebert.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical standard

The local ethics committee (Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin) has approved the study. All study procedures have been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments.

Informed consent

Due to the retrospective review of depersonalized medical records for this study, the ethics committee granted a waiver of informed consent.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Siebert, E., Bohner, G., Liebig, T. et al. Factors associated with fatal outcome in posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome: a retrospective analysis of the Berlin PRES study. J Neurol 264, 237–242 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-016-8328-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-016-8328-4

Keywords

Navigation