Abstract
Gait dysfunction in Parkinson’s disease (PD) does not always respond to bilateral subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS). Since right hemisphere motor networks may be dominant for gait control, identical stimulation of asymmetric circuits could account for gait dysfunction. We compared the effects of bilateral and unilateral STN-DBS on gait kinematics in PD patients who developed gait impairment after STN-DBS. Twenty-two PD patients with >50 % improvement in motor scores, but dopamine-resistant gait dysfunction 6–12 months after bilateral STN-DBS were blindly tested off dopaminergic effects in four randomly assigned DBS conditions: bilateral, right-sided, left-sided and off stimulation. Motor scores (MDS-UPDRS III), gait scores (MDS-UPRDS 2.11–2.13 + 3.9–3.13), turning time (seconds), stride length (meters) and velocity (meters/second) were measured 1 h after DBS changes. Motor and gait scores significantly improved with bilateral versus unilateral STN-DBS. Stride length and velocity (0.95 ± 0.06, 0.84 ± 0.07) significantly improved with bilateral (1.09 ± 0.04, 0.95 ± 0.05), right-sided (1.06 ± 0.04, 0.92 ± 0.05) and left-sided stimulation (1.01 ± 0.05, 0.90 ± 0.05) (p < 0.05). Stride length significantly improved with right-sided versus left-sided (0.05 ± 0.02) and bilateral versus left-sided stimulation (0.07 ± 0.02) (p < 0.05). Turning time (4.89 ± 0.6) tended to improve with bilateral (4.13 ± 0.5) (p = 0.15) and right-sided (4.27 ± 0.6) (p = 0.2) more than with left STN-DBS (4.69 ± 0.5) (p = 0.5). Bilateral STN-DBS yields greater improvement in motor and gait scores in PD patients. Yet, unilateral stimulation has similar effects on gait kinematics. Particularly, right-sided stimulation might produce slightly greater improvements. Although the clinical relevance of differential programming of right versus left-sided STN-DBS is unclear, this approach could be considered in the management of treatment-resistant gait dysfunction in PD.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Vu TC, Nutt JG, Holford NH (2012) Progression of motor and nonmotor features of Parkinson’s disease and their response to treatment. Br J Clin Pharmacol 74:267–283. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2125.2012.04192.x
Giladi N, McDermott MP, Fahn S, Przedborski S, Jankovic J, Stern M, Tanner C, Parkinson Study Group (2001) Freezing of gait in PD: prospective assessment in the DATATOP cohort. Neurology 56:1712–1721
Fling BW, Cohen RG, Mancini M, Nutt JG, Fair DA, Horak FB (2013) Asymmetric pedunculopontine network connectivity in parkinsonian patients with freezing of gait. Brain 136(Pt 8):2405–2418. doi:10.1093/brain/awt172
Peterson DS, Pickett KA, Duncan R, Perlmutter J, Earhart GM (2014) Gait-related brain activity in people with Parkinson disease with freezing of gait. PLoS One 9:e90634. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0090634
Cremers J, D’Ostilio K, Stamatakis J, Delvaux V, Garraux G (2012) Brain activation pattern related to gait disturbances in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 27:1498–1505. doi:10.1002/mds.25139
Castrioto A, Meaney C, Hamani C, Mazzella F, Poon YY, Lozano AM, Hodaie M, Moro E (2011) The dominant-STN phenomenon in bilateral STN DBS for Parkinson’s disease. Neurobiol Dis 41:131–137. doi:10.1016/j.nbd.2010.08.029
St George RJ, Nutt JG, Burchiel KJ, Horak FB (2010) A meta-regression of the long-term effects of deep brain stimulation on balance and gait in PD. Neurology 75:1292–1299. doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181f61329
Moreau C, Defebvre L, Destee A, Bleuse S, Clement F, Blatt JL, Krystkowiak P, Devos D (2008) STN-DBS frequency effects on freezing of gait in advanced Parkinson disease. Neurology 71:80–84. doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000303972.16279.46
Fasano A, Herzog J, Seifert E, Stolze H, Falk D, Reese R, Volkmann J, Deuschl G (2011) Modulation of gait coordination by subthalamic stimulation improves freezing of gait. Mov Disord 26:844–851. doi:10.1002/mds.23583
Singh A, Kammermeier S, Plate A, Mehrkens JH, Ilmberger J, Botzel K (2011) Pattern of local field potential activity in the globus pallidus internum of dystonic patients during walking on a treadmill. Exp Neurol 232:162–167. doi:10.1016/j.expneurol.2011.08.019
Temperli P, Ghika J, Villemure JG, Burkhard PR, Bogousslavsky J, Vingerhoets FJ (2003) How do parkinsonian signs return after discontinuation of subthalamic DBS? Neurology 60:78–81
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr. Kris Arheart for his assistance with the statistical analysis and Dr. Bruno Gallo for his help with the programming of the DBS devices. This work has been supported by the American Academy of Neurology Clinical Training Fellowship for Dr. Corneliu C. Luca.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
Drs. Jonathan Jagid and Corneliu C. Luca are consultants for Medtronics. Dr. Karlo J. Lizarraga has no conflicts of interest to declare.
Ethical standards
This study was approved by the institutional regulatory bord and conducted in full compliance.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lizarraga, K.J., Jagid, J.R. & Luca, C.C. Comparative effects of unilateral and bilateral subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation on gait kinematics in Parkinson’s disease: a randomized, blinded study. J Neurol 263, 1652–1656 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-016-8191-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-016-8191-3