Abstract
This study aimed to report the bone-anchored hearing aid uptake rate and the reasons for their rejection by patients with conductive and mixed hearing losses. A retrospective review was performed of 113 consecutive patients with unilateral or bilateral conductive or mixed hearing loss referred to the Greater Manchester bone-anchored hearing aid (BAHA) programme between September 2008 and August 2011. 98 (86.7 %) patients were deemed audiologically suitable for BAHA implantation. Of these, 38 (38.8 %) had BAHA implanted; 60 (61.2 %) patients declined. Of those who declined, 27 (45 %) cited anxiety over surgery, 18 (30 %) cited cosmetic reasons, 16 (26.7 %) perceived limited benefit from the device and six (10 %) preferred conventional hearing aids. Our study highlights a 38.8 % BAHA uptake rate in audiologically suitable patients. The main reasons cited for rejection of BAHA were anxiety over surgery and cosmetic concerns. It is important that clinicians address these early during consultation with prospective BAHA recipients and avoid rushing to implant these patients with a bone-anchored hearing aid.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Snik AF, Mylanus EA, Proops DW, Wolfaardt JF, Hodgetts WE, Somers T, Niparko JK, Wazen JJ, Sterkers O, Cremers CW, Tjellström A (2005) Consensus statements on the BAHA system: where do we stand at present? Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 195:2–12
Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, Brånemark PI (1981) A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg 10(6):387–416
Tjellström A, Rosenhall U, Lindström J, Hallen O, Albrektsson T, Brånemark PI (1983) Five-year experience with skin-penetrating bone-anchored implants in the temporal bone. Acta Otolaryngol 95(5–6):568–575
Tjellström A (1989) Osseointegrated systems and their applications in the head and neck. Am J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 3:39–70
Tjellström A, Granström G (1995) One-stage procedure to establish osseointegration: a 0–5 years follow-up report. J Laryngol Otol 109(7):593–598
Kohan D, Morris LG, Romo T 3rd (2008) Single-stage BAHA implantation in adults and children: is it safe? Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 138(5):662–666
Mylanus EA, Cremers CW (1994) A one-stage surgical procedure for placement of percutaneous implants for the bone-anchored hearing aid. J Laryngol Otol 108(12):1031–1035
Centric A, Chennupati SK (2014) Abutment-free bone-anchored hearing devices in children: initial results and experience. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 78(5):875–878
Ihler F, Volbers L, Blum J, Matthias C, Canis M (2014) Preliminary functional results and quality of life after implantation of a new bone conduction hearing device in patients with conductive and mixed hearing loss. Otol Neurotol 35(2):211–215
Riss D, Arnoldner C, Baumgartner WD, Blineder M, Flak S, Bachner A, Gstoettner W, Hamzavi JS (2014) Indication criteria and outcomes with the bonebridge transcutaneous bone-conduction implant. Laryngoscope 124(12):2802–2806
Saroul N, Akkari M, Pavier Y, Gilain L, Mom T (2014) BAHA-mediated rehabilitation of patients with unilateral deafness: selection criteria. Audiol Neurootol 19(2):85–90
Pennings RJ, Gulliver M, Morris DP (2011) The importance of an extended preoperative trial of BAHA in unilateral sensorineural hearing loss: a prospective cohort study. Clin Otolaryngol 36(5):442–449
Zawawi F, Kabbach G, Lallemand M, Daniel SJ (2014) Bone-anchored hearing aid: why do some patients refuse it? Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 78(2):232–234
Siau D, Dhillon B, Andrews R, Green KM (2015) Bone-anchored hearing aids and unilateral sensorineural hearing loss: why do patients reject them? J Laryngol Otol 129(4):321–325
Cochlear™ (2011) Baha® Candidate Selection Guide
MED-EL (2015) Vibrant Soundbridge® Factsheet
Hol MK, Snik AF, Mylanus EA, Cremers CW (2005) Long-term results of bone-anchored hearing aid recipients who had previously used air-conduction hearing aids. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 131(4):321–325
McDermott AL, Dutt SN, Reid AP, Proops DW (2002) An intra-individual comparison of the previous conventional hearing aid with the bone-anchored hearing aid: the Nijmegen Group Questionnaire. J Laryngol Otol Suppl 28:15–19
de Wolf MJ, Hendrix S, Cremers CW, Snik AF (2011) Better performance with bone-anchored hearing aid than acoustic devices in patients with severe air-bone gap. Laryngoscope 121(3):613–616
Rasmussen J, Olsen SO, Nielsen LH (2012) Evaluation of long-term patient satisfaction and experience with the BAHA(R) bone conduction implant. Int J Audiol 51(3):194–199
Badran K, Bunstone D, Arya AK, Suryanarayanan R, Mackinnon N (2006) Patient satisfaction with the bone-anchored hearing aid: a 14-year experience. Otol Neurotol 27(5):659–666
Barbara M, Biagini M, Lazzarino AI, Monini S (2010) Hearing and quality of life in a South European BAHA population. Acta Otolaryngol 130(9):1040–1047
Hultcrantz M (2011) Outcome of the bone-anchored hearing aid procedure without skin thinning: a prospective clinical trial. Otol Neurotol 32(7):1134–1139
Rivas J, Rivas A, Rincon LA, Tamayo CA, Forero VH, Rivas A (2012) Vibrant Soundbridge vs BAHA: outcomes comparison. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 147(2):226
Cote M, Deguine O, Calmels MN, Iversenc G, Fraysse B (2011) BAHA or medel Vibrant Soundbridge: results and criteria of decision. Cochlear Implants Int 12(Suppl 1):S130–S132
Cooper HR, Burrell SP, Powell RH, Proops DW, Bickerton JA (1996) The Birmingham bone anchored hearing aid programme: referrals, selection, rehabilitation, philosophy and adult results. J Laryngol Otol Suppl 21:13–20
Tringali S, Grayeli AB, Bouccara D, Sterkers O, Chardon S, Martin C, Dubreuil C (2008) A survey of satisfaction and use among patients fitted with a BAHA. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 265(12):1461–1464
Wazen JJ, Caruso M, Tjellström A (1998) Long-term results with the titanium bone-anchored hearing aid: the US experience. Am J Otol 19(6):737–741
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical standards
Ethical approval was not sought for this study. For this type of study formal consent is not required.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Siau, R.T.K., Dhillon, B., Siau, D. et al. Bone-anchored hearing aids in conductive and mixed hearing losses: why do patients reject them?. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 273, 3117–3122 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-016-3941-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-016-3941-5