Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Bone-anchored hearing aids in conductive and mixed hearing losses: why do patients reject them?

  • Otology
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study aimed to report the bone-anchored hearing aid uptake rate and the reasons for their rejection by patients with conductive and mixed hearing losses. A retrospective review was performed of 113 consecutive patients with unilateral or bilateral conductive or mixed hearing loss referred to the Greater Manchester bone-anchored hearing aid (BAHA) programme between September 2008 and August 2011. 98 (86.7 %) patients were deemed audiologically suitable for BAHA implantation. Of these, 38 (38.8 %) had BAHA implanted; 60 (61.2 %) patients declined. Of those who declined, 27 (45 %) cited anxiety over surgery, 18 (30 %) cited cosmetic reasons, 16 (26.7 %) perceived limited benefit from the device and six (10 %) preferred conventional hearing aids. Our study highlights a 38.8 % BAHA uptake rate in audiologically suitable patients. The main reasons cited for rejection of BAHA were anxiety over surgery and cosmetic concerns. It is important that clinicians address these early during consultation with prospective BAHA recipients and avoid rushing to implant these patients with a bone-anchored hearing aid.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Snik AF, Mylanus EA, Proops DW, Wolfaardt JF, Hodgetts WE, Somers T, Niparko JK, Wazen JJ, Sterkers O, Cremers CW, Tjellström A (2005) Consensus statements on the BAHA system: where do we stand at present? Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 195:2–12

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, Brånemark PI (1981) A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg 10(6):387–416

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Tjellström A, Rosenhall U, Lindström J, Hallen O, Albrektsson T, Brånemark PI (1983) Five-year experience with skin-penetrating bone-anchored implants in the temporal bone. Acta Otolaryngol 95(5–6):568–575

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Tjellström A (1989) Osseointegrated systems and their applications in the head and neck. Am J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 3:39–70

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tjellström A, Granström G (1995) One-stage procedure to establish osseointegration: a 0–5 years follow-up report. J Laryngol Otol 109(7):593–598

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kohan D, Morris LG, Romo T 3rd (2008) Single-stage BAHA implantation in adults and children: is it safe? Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 138(5):662–666

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mylanus EA, Cremers CW (1994) A one-stage surgical procedure for placement of percutaneous implants for the bone-anchored hearing aid. J Laryngol Otol 108(12):1031–1035

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Centric A, Chennupati SK (2014) Abutment-free bone-anchored hearing devices in children: initial results and experience. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 78(5):875–878

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ihler F, Volbers L, Blum J, Matthias C, Canis M (2014) Preliminary functional results and quality of life after implantation of a new bone conduction hearing device in patients with conductive and mixed hearing loss. Otol Neurotol 35(2):211–215

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Riss D, Arnoldner C, Baumgartner WD, Blineder M, Flak S, Bachner A, Gstoettner W, Hamzavi JS (2014) Indication criteria and outcomes with the bonebridge transcutaneous bone-conduction implant. Laryngoscope 124(12):2802–2806

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Saroul N, Akkari M, Pavier Y, Gilain L, Mom T (2014) BAHA-mediated rehabilitation of patients with unilateral deafness: selection criteria. Audiol Neurootol 19(2):85–90

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Pennings RJ, Gulliver M, Morris DP (2011) The importance of an extended preoperative trial of BAHA in unilateral sensorineural hearing loss: a prospective cohort study. Clin Otolaryngol 36(5):442–449

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Zawawi F, Kabbach G, Lallemand M, Daniel SJ (2014) Bone-anchored hearing aid: why do some patients refuse it? Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 78(2):232–234

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Siau D, Dhillon B, Andrews R, Green KM (2015) Bone-anchored hearing aids and unilateral sensorineural hearing loss: why do patients reject them? J Laryngol Otol 129(4):321–325

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cochlear™ (2011) Baha® Candidate Selection Guide

  16. MED-EL (2015) Vibrant Soundbridge® Factsheet

  17. Hol MK, Snik AF, Mylanus EA, Cremers CW (2005) Long-term results of bone-anchored hearing aid recipients who had previously used air-conduction hearing aids. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 131(4):321–325

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. McDermott AL, Dutt SN, Reid AP, Proops DW (2002) An intra-individual comparison of the previous conventional hearing aid with the bone-anchored hearing aid: the Nijmegen Group Questionnaire. J Laryngol Otol Suppl 28:15–19

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. de Wolf MJ, Hendrix S, Cremers CW, Snik AF (2011) Better performance with bone-anchored hearing aid than acoustic devices in patients with severe air-bone gap. Laryngoscope 121(3):613–616

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Rasmussen J, Olsen SO, Nielsen LH (2012) Evaluation of long-term patient satisfaction and experience with the BAHA(R) bone conduction implant. Int J Audiol 51(3):194–199

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Badran K, Bunstone D, Arya AK, Suryanarayanan R, Mackinnon N (2006) Patient satisfaction with the bone-anchored hearing aid: a 14-year experience. Otol Neurotol 27(5):659–666

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Barbara M, Biagini M, Lazzarino AI, Monini S (2010) Hearing and quality of life in a South European BAHA population. Acta Otolaryngol 130(9):1040–1047

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hultcrantz M (2011) Outcome of the bone-anchored hearing aid procedure without skin thinning: a prospective clinical trial. Otol Neurotol 32(7):1134–1139

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Rivas J, Rivas A, Rincon LA, Tamayo CA, Forero VH, Rivas A (2012) Vibrant Soundbridge vs BAHA: outcomes comparison. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 147(2):226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Cote M, Deguine O, Calmels MN, Iversenc G, Fraysse B (2011) BAHA or medel Vibrant Soundbridge: results and criteria of decision. Cochlear Implants Int 12(Suppl 1):S130–S132

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Cooper HR, Burrell SP, Powell RH, Proops DW, Bickerton JA (1996) The Birmingham bone anchored hearing aid programme: referrals, selection, rehabilitation, philosophy and adult results. J Laryngol Otol Suppl 21:13–20

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Tringali S, Grayeli AB, Bouccara D, Sterkers O, Chardon S, Martin C, Dubreuil C (2008) A survey of satisfaction and use among patients fitted with a BAHA. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 265(12):1461–1464

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Wazen JJ, Caruso M, Tjellström A (1998) Long-term results with the titanium bone-anchored hearing aid: the US experience. Am J Otol 19(6):737–741

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard T. K. Siau.

Ethics declarations

Ethical standards

Ethical approval was not sought for this study. For this type of study formal consent is not required.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Siau, R.T.K., Dhillon, B., Siau, D. et al. Bone-anchored hearing aids in conductive and mixed hearing losses: why do patients reject them?. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 273, 3117–3122 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-016-3941-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-016-3941-5

Keywords

Navigation