Abstract
Intraoperative monitoring of the auditory pathway by means of either electrocochleography or auditory brainstem response audiometry is valuable during hearing preservation vestibular schwannoma (VS) surgery. A more than 75% intraoperative reduction of the amplitude of these evoked auditory potentials was thought to be related with clear hearing compromise of hearing. We identified 22 patients who satisfied this intraoperative criterion in a cohort of 86 consecutive patients who had attempted hearing preservation VS surgery. The surgical step that temporally coincided with the above event was considered to be the most critical step for hearing monitoring during this kind of surgery. Most frequently, drilling of the internal auditory canal and direct tumor resection were associated with the aforementioned changes, but also drilling of the cortical temporal bone at the very beginning of surgery or the opening of the dura could be implicated. This profound intraoperative amplitude decrease was associated with a profound postoperative hearing impairment in 84% of the cases.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Colletti V, Fiorino FG, Carner M, Tonoli G (1997) Mechanisms of auditory impairment during acoustic neuroma surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 117:596–605
Colletti V, Fiorinno FG, Carner M, Cumer G, Giarbini N, Sacchetto L (2000) Intraoperative monitoring for hearing preservation and restoration in acoustic neuroma surgery. Skull Base Surgery 10:187–195
Committee on Hearing and Equilibrium, American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation, Inc: Committee on Hearing and Equilibrium guidelines for the evaluation of hearing preservation in acoustic neuroma (vestibular schwannoma). Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1995; 113: 178–180
Kemick JL, LaRouere ML, Kileny PR, Telian SA, Hoff JT (1990) Hearing preservation following suboccipital removal of acoustic neuroma. Laryngoscope 100:597–602
Matthies C, Samii M (1997) Management of vestibular schwannomas (acoustic neuromas): the value of neurophysiology for evaluation and prediction of auditory function in 420 cases. Neurosurgery 40:919–929
Nadol JB Jr, Chiong CM, Ojemann RG, McKenna MJ, Martuza RL, Montgomery WW, Levine RA, Ronner SF, Glynn RJ (1992) Preservation of hearing and facial nerve function in resection of acoustic neuroma. Laryngoscope 102:1153–1158
Ogawa K, Kanzaki J, Ogawa S, Tsuchihashi N, Inoue Y, Sato M, Ikeda S (1996) Electrocochleography during experimental cochlear ischemia of the guinea pig. Acta Otolaryngol 116:253–256
Roberson J, Senne A, Brackmann D, Hitselberger WE, Saunders J (1996) Direct cochlear nerve action potentials as an aid to hearing preservation in middle fossa acoustic neuroma resection. Am J Otol 17:653–657
Sekiya T, Iwabuchi T, Kamata S, Ishida T (1985) Deterioration of auditory evoked potentials during cerebellopontine angle manipulations: an interpretation based on an experimental model in dogs. J Neurosurg 63:598–607
Slavit DH, Harner SG, Harper CM Jr, Beatty CW (1991) Auditory monitoring during acoustic neuroma removal. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 117:1153–1157
Wazen JJ (1994) Intraoperative monitoring of auditory function: experimental observations and new applications. Laryngoscope 104:446–455
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gouveris, H., Mann, W. Association between surgical steps and intraoperative auditory brainstem response and electrocochleography waveforms during hearing preservation vestibular schwannoma surgery. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 266, 225–229 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-008-0741-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-008-0741-6