Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Hands-free speech after surgical voice rehabilitation with a Provox® voice prosthesis: experience with the Provox FreeHands HME tracheostoma valve® system

  • Laryngology
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Excellent results have been reported with the use of voice prostheses for the rehabilitation of laryngectomees. Patients, however, consider it a disadvantage that the tracheostoma must be closed manually for speech production. This limits their ability to simultaneously communicate by gesture or to work with both hands. An automatic tracheostoma valve helps patients overcome this problem. We describe a prospective clinical trial evaluating our experience with the Provox FreeHands HME Automatic Tracheostoma Valve® system. Twenty-four laryngectomees were randomly selected from the patients who had undergone laryngectomy at the ENT Department. Immediately, after 4 weeks and 6 months later having been fitted with a Provox FreeHands HME®, the patients were asked to complete a questionnaire in order to assess their satisfaction, voice quality, wearing comfort, fixation, potential problems, and the effectiveness of the HME cassette. In addition, we investigated relevant voice quality parameters including dynamics range, frequency range of the speaking voice, and maximum phonation time. Seven patients discontinued the study due to problems of securing the valve to the skin (four patients) or recurrent cancer (three patients). Ten of the remaining 17 patients wore the valve daily for an average of 8.4 h. A total of 88% of the patients considered it a great advantage to be able to speak without having to use their hands. With the Provox FreeHands HME®, maximum phonation time was 8.7 (±6.2) s and the dynamic range was 21.9 (±5.8) decibels. The results show that the Provox FreeHands HME Automatic Tracheostoma Valve® system not only allows hands-free speech but is also associated with excellent compliance and good voice rehabilitation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ackerstaff AH, Hilgers FJM, Aaronson NK, Balm AJM, Van Zandwijk N (1993) Improvements in respiratory and psychosocial functioning following total laryngectomy by the use of a heat and moisture exchanger. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 102:78–83

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ackerstaff AH, Hilgers FJM, Aaronson NK, De Boer MF, Meeuwis CA, Knegt PPM (1995) Heat and moisture exchangers as a treatment option in the post-operative rehabilitation of larvngectomized patients. Clin Otolaryngol 20:504–509

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ackerstaff AH, Hilgers FJM, Balm AJM, Tan IB (1998) Long term compliance of laryngectomized patients with a specialized pulmonary rehabilitation device, Provox Stomafilter. Laryngoscope 108:257–260

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Blakely BW, Podraza BL (1987) Acoustic and perceptual assessment of speech using a voice prosthesis with valvular and manual occlusion. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 97:552–557

    Google Scholar 

  5. Blom ED, Singer MI, Hamaker RC (1982) Tracheostoma valve for postlaryngectomy voice rehabilitation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 91:576–578

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Doyle PC, Grantmyre A, Myers C (1989) Clinical modification of the tracheostoma breathing valve for voice restoration. J Speech Hear Dis 54:189–192

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Fujimoto PA, Madison CL, Larigan LB (1991) The effects of a tracheostoma valve on the intelligibility and quality of tracheoesophageal speech. J Speech Hear Res 34:33–36

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Herrmann IF, Koss W (1986) Experience with the Eska-Hermann tracheostoma valve. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hilgers FJM, Ackerstaff AH (2000) Comprehensive rehabilitation after total laryngectomy is more than voice alone. Folia Phoniatr Logop 52:65–73

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hilgers FJM, Ackerstaff AH (2006) Development and evaluation of a novel tracheostoma button and fixation system (Provox LaryButton and LaryClip adhesive) to facilitate hands free tracheoesophageal speech. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh), in press

  11. Hilgers FJM, Ackerstaff AH, Aaronson NK, Schouwenburg PF, Van Zandwijk N (1990) Physical and psychosocial consequences of total laryngectomy. Clin Otolaryngol 15:421–425

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hilgers FJM, Aaronson NK, Ackerstaff AH, Schouwenburg PF, Van Zandwijk N (1991) The influence of a heat and moisture exchanger (HME) on the respiratory symptoms after total laryngectomy. Clin Otolaryngol 16:152–156

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hilgers FJM, Ackerstaff AH, van As CJ, Balm AJM, van den Brekel MWM, Tan IB (2003) Development and clinical assessment of a Heat and Moisture Exchanger with a multi-magnet automatic tracheostoma valve (Provox FreeHands HME) for vocal and pulmonary rehabilitation after total laryngectomy. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 123:91–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Maddalena H, Pfrang H, Schohe R, Zenner HP (1991) Sprachverständlichkeit und psychosoziale Anpassung bei verschiedenen Stimmrehabilitationsmethoden nach Laryngektomie. Laryngorhinootologie 70:562–567

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. McRae D, Young P, Hamilton J, Jones A (1996) Raising airway resistance in laryngectomees increases tissue oxygen saturation. Clin Otolaryngol 21:366–368

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Op de Coul BMR, Hilgers FJM, Balm AJM, Tan IB, Van den Hoogen FJA, Van Tinteren H (2000) A decade of postlaryngectomy vocal rehabilitation in 318 patients: a single institution experience with consistent application of indwelling voice prostheses (Provox). Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 126:1320–1328

    Google Scholar 

  17. Op de Coul BMR, Ackerstaff AH, van As CJ, van den Hoogen FJA, Meeuwis CA, Manni JJ, Hilgers FJM (2005) Quality of life assessment in laryngectomized individuals: do we need additions to standard questionnaires in specific clinical research projects? Clin Otolaryngol 30:169–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Op de Coul BNR, Ackerstaff AH, van As-Brooks CJ, van den Hoogen FJA, Meeuwis CA, Manni JJ, Hilgers FJM (2005) Compliance, quality of life and quantitative voice quality aspects of hands-free speech. Acta Otolaryngol 125:629–637

    Google Scholar 

  19. Tisch M, Lorenz KJ, Störrle E, Maier H (2003) Lebensqualität laryngektomierter Patienten nach chirurgischer Stimmrehabilitation Erfahrungen mit der Provox Prothese. HNO 51:467–472

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Van den Hoogen FJA, Meeuwis C, Oudes MJ, Janssen P, Manni JJ (1996) The Blom–Singer tracheostoma valve as a valuable addition in the rehabilitation of the laryngectomized patient. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 253:126–129

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Van As CJ, Hilgers FJM, Koopmans-van Beinum FJ, Ackerstaff AH (1998) The influence of stoma occlusion on aspects of tracheoesophageal voice. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 118:732–738

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Verkerke GJ, Veenstra A, Schutte HK, Hermann IF, Rakhorst G (1994) Design and test of a hands-free tracheostoma valve to improve the rehabilitation process after laryngectomy. Int J Artif Organs 17:175–182

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Williams SE, Scanio TS, Ritterman SI (1989) Temporal and perceptual characteristics of tracheoesophageal voice. Laryngoscope 99:846–850

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Williams SE, Scanio TS, Ritterman SI (1990) Perceptual characteristics of tracheoesophageal voice produced using four prosthetic/occlusion combinations. Laryngoscope 100:290–293

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, German Armed Forces Hospital, Oberer Eselsberg 40, 89081, Ulm, Germany

    K. J. Lorenz, K. Groll & H. Maier

  2. Department of Head and Neck Oncology and Surgery, The Netherlands Cancer Institute—Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    A. H. Ackerstaff & F. J. M. Hilgers

  3. Institute of Phonetic Sciences/Amsterdam Center for Language and Communication, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    F. J. M. Hilgers

  4. Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    F. J. M. Hilgers

Authors
  1. K. J. Lorenz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. K. Groll
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. A. H. Ackerstaff
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. F. J. M. Hilgers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. H. Maier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. J. Lorenz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lorenz, K.J., Groll, K., Ackerstaff, A.H. et al. Hands-free speech after surgical voice rehabilitation with a Provox® voice prosthesis: experience with the Provox FreeHands HME tracheostoma valve® system. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 264, 151–157 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-006-0155-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-006-0155-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation