Abstract
Purpose
Cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) is one of the rarest forms of ectopic pregnancy. A delay in treatment can lead to massive bleeding, uterine rupture, and life-threatening maternal morbidity. We present a conservative method for the management of CSP at a single tertiary centre over a 6-year period.
Methods
Eleven patients with unruptured CSPs who were treated by transvaginal aspiration of the gestational sac followed by a local methotrexate injection were evaluated.
Results
Gestational age at diagnosis ranged from 5 + 2 weeks to 7 + 4 weeks. Seven of the patients had undergone two prior Caesarean sections (63.6 %). The levels of β-hCG at the time of diagnosis ranged from 1,290 to 81,586 mIu/ml. The mean time of the procedure was 8.2 ± 1.6 min. During follow up, 54.5 % of the patients may need an additional systemic MTX injection due to an elevation of β-hCG. Estimated blood loss of the procedure was <50 ml and no blood transfusion is needed. This method has a shorter operative time, less blood loss and no hospitalization is needed for CSPs. All patients had their uterus successfully preserved without maternal morbidity or mortality.
Conclusions
Transvaginal sono-guided sac aspiration concurrent with a local MTX injection is an effective management option for preserving the fertility of women with an unruptured CSP. However, additional systemic MTX injection may be needed if β-hCG levels >20,000 mIU/ml at diagnosis.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Seow KM, Huang LW, Lin YH, Lin MY, Tsai YL, Hwang JL (2004) Cesarean scar pregnancy: issues in management. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 23:247–253
Jurkovic D, Hillaby K, Woelfer B, Lawrence A, Salim R, Elson CJ (2003) First-trimester diagnosis and management of pregnancies implanted into the lower uterine segment Cesarean section scar. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 21:220–227
Fylstra DL (2002) Ectopic pregnancy within a cesarean scar: a review. Obstet Gynecol Surv 57:537–543
Nonaka M, Toyoki H, Imai A (2006) Cesarean section scar pregnancy may be the cause of serious hemorrhage after first-trimester abortion by dilatation and curettage. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 95:50–51
Godin PA, Bassil S, Donnez J (1997) An ectopic pregnancy developing in a previous caesarian section scar. Fertil Steril 67:398–400
Wang JH, Xu KH, Lin J, Xu JY, Wu RJ (2009) Methotrexate therapy for cesarean section scar pregnancy with and without suction curettage. Fertil Steril 92:1208–1213
Wang CN, Chen CK, Wang HS, Chiueh HY, Soong YK (2007) Successful management of heterotopic cesarean scar pregnancy combined with intrauterine pregnancy after in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer. Fertil Steril 88(706):e13–e16
Chiang AJ, La V, Chou CP, Wang PH, Yu KJ (2011) Ectopic pregnancy in a cesarean section scar. Fertil Steril 95:2388–2389
Wang CB, Tseng CJ (2006) Primary evacuation therapy for Cesarean scar pregnancy: three new cases and review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 27:222–226
Arslan M, Pata O, Dilek TU, Aktas A, Aban M, Dilek S (2005) Treatment of viable cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy with suction curettage. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 89:163–166
Li H, Guo HY, Han JS et al (2011) Endoscopic treatment of ectopic pregnancy in a cesarean scar. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 18:31–35
Wang CJ, Yuen LT, Chao AS, Lee CL, Yen CF, Soong YK (2005) Caesarean scar pregnancy successfully treated by operative hysteroscopy and suction curettage. BJOG 112:839–840
Chao A, Wang TH, Wang CJ, Lee CL, Chao AS (2005) Hysteroscopic management of cesarean scar pregnancy after unsuccessful methotrexate treatment. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 12:374–376
Lee CL, Wang CJ, Chao A, Yen CF, Soong YK (1999) Laparoscopic management of an ectopic pregnancy in a previous Caesarean section scar. Hum Reprod 14:1234–1236
Wang CJ, Chao AS, Yuen LT, Wang CW, Soong YK, Lee CL (2006) Endoscopic management of cesarean scar pregnancy. Fertil Steril 85(494):e1–e4
Wang YL, Su TH, Chen HS (2006) Operative laparoscopy for unruptured ectopic pregnancy in a caesarean scar. BJOG 113:1035–1038
Hwu YM, Hsu CY, Yang HY (2005) Conservative treatment of caesarean scar pregnancy with transvaginal needle aspiration of the embryo. BJOG 112:841–842
Ravhon A, Ben-Chetrit A, Rabinowitz R, Neuman M, Beller U (1997) Successful methotrexate treatment of a viable pregnancy within a thin uterine scar. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 104:628–629
Sugawara J, Senoo M, Chisaka H, Yaegashi N, Okamura K (2005) Successful conservative treatment of a cesarean scar pregnancy with uterine artery embolization. Tohoku J Exp Med 206:261–265
Jurkovic D, Ben-Nagi J, Ofilli-Yebovi D, Sawyer E, Helmy S, Yazbek J (2007) Efficacy of Shirodkar cervical suture in securing hemostasis following surgical evacuation of Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 30(95–100):24
Jiang T, Liu G, Huang L, Ma H, Zhang S (2011) Methotrexate therapy followed by suction curettage followed by Foley tamponade for caesarean scar pregnancy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 156:209–211
Li C, Feng D, Jia C, Liu B, Zhan X (2011) Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization versus systemic methotrexate for the management of cesarean scar pregnancy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 113:178–182
Yin X, Su S, Dong B, Ban Y, Li C, Sun B (2012) Angiographic uterine artery chemoembolization followed by vacuum aspiration: an efficient and safe treatment for managing complicated cesarean scar pregnancy. Arch Gynecol Obstet 285:1313–1318
Bignardi T, Condous G (2010) Transrectal ultrasound-guided surgical evacuation of Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 35:481–485
He M, Chen MH, Xie HZ et al (2011) Transvaginal removal of ectopic pregnancy tissue and repair of uterine defect for caesarean scar pregnancy. BJOG 118:1136–1139
Conflict of interest
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Seow, KM., Wang, PH., Huang, LW. et al. Transvaginal sono-guided aspiration of gestational sac concurrent with a local methotrexate injection for the treatment of unruptured cesarean scar pregnancy. Arch Gynecol Obstet 288, 361–366 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-013-2765-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-013-2765-4