Skip to main content
Log in

Transvaginal sono-guided aspiration of gestational sac concurrent with a local methotrexate injection for the treatment of unruptured cesarean scar pregnancy

  • General Gynecology
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) is one of the rarest forms of ectopic pregnancy. A delay in treatment can lead to massive bleeding, uterine rupture, and life-threatening maternal morbidity. We present a conservative method for the management of CSP at a single tertiary centre over a 6-year period.

Methods

Eleven patients with unruptured CSPs who were treated by transvaginal aspiration of the gestational sac followed by a local methotrexate injection were evaluated.

Results

Gestational age at diagnosis ranged from 5 + 2 weeks to 7 + 4 weeks. Seven of the patients had undergone two prior Caesarean sections (63.6 %). The levels of β-hCG at the time of diagnosis ranged from 1,290 to 81,586 mIu/ml. The mean time of the procedure was 8.2 ± 1.6 min. During follow up, 54.5 % of the patients may need an additional systemic MTX injection due to an elevation of β-hCG. Estimated blood loss of the procedure was <50 ml and no blood transfusion is needed. This method has a shorter operative time, less blood loss and no hospitalization is needed for CSPs. All patients had their uterus successfully preserved without maternal morbidity or mortality.

Conclusions

Transvaginal sono-guided sac aspiration concurrent with a local MTX injection is an effective management option for preserving the fertility of women with an unruptured CSP. However, additional systemic MTX injection may be needed if β-hCG levels >20,000 mIU/ml at diagnosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Seow KM, Huang LW, Lin YH, Lin MY, Tsai YL, Hwang JL (2004) Cesarean scar pregnancy: issues in management. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 23:247–253

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Jurkovic D, Hillaby K, Woelfer B, Lawrence A, Salim R, Elson CJ (2003) First-trimester diagnosis and management of pregnancies implanted into the lower uterine segment Cesarean section scar. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 21:220–227

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Fylstra DL (2002) Ectopic pregnancy within a cesarean scar: a review. Obstet Gynecol Surv 57:537–543

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Nonaka M, Toyoki H, Imai A (2006) Cesarean section scar pregnancy may be the cause of serious hemorrhage after first-trimester abortion by dilatation and curettage. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 95:50–51

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Godin PA, Bassil S, Donnez J (1997) An ectopic pregnancy developing in a previous caesarian section scar. Fertil Steril 67:398–400

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang JH, Xu KH, Lin J, Xu JY, Wu RJ (2009) Methotrexate therapy for cesarean section scar pregnancy with and without suction curettage. Fertil Steril 92:1208–1213

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Wang CN, Chen CK, Wang HS, Chiueh HY, Soong YK (2007) Successful management of heterotopic cesarean scar pregnancy combined with intrauterine pregnancy after in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer. Fertil Steril 88(706):e13–e16

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Chiang AJ, La V, Chou CP, Wang PH, Yu KJ (2011) Ectopic pregnancy in a cesarean section scar. Fertil Steril 95:2388–2389

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wang CB, Tseng CJ (2006) Primary evacuation therapy for Cesarean scar pregnancy: three new cases and review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 27:222–226

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Arslan M, Pata O, Dilek TU, Aktas A, Aban M, Dilek S (2005) Treatment of viable cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy with suction curettage. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 89:163–166

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Li H, Guo HY, Han JS et al (2011) Endoscopic treatment of ectopic pregnancy in a cesarean scar. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 18:31–35

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Wang CJ, Yuen LT, Chao AS, Lee CL, Yen CF, Soong YK (2005) Caesarean scar pregnancy successfully treated by operative hysteroscopy and suction curettage. BJOG 112:839–840

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Chao A, Wang TH, Wang CJ, Lee CL, Chao AS (2005) Hysteroscopic management of cesarean scar pregnancy after unsuccessful methotrexate treatment. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 12:374–376

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lee CL, Wang CJ, Chao A, Yen CF, Soong YK (1999) Laparoscopic management of an ectopic pregnancy in a previous Caesarean section scar. Hum Reprod 14:1234–1236

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang CJ, Chao AS, Yuen LT, Wang CW, Soong YK, Lee CL (2006) Endoscopic management of cesarean scar pregnancy. Fertil Steril 85(494):e1–e4

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang YL, Su TH, Chen HS (2006) Operative laparoscopy for unruptured ectopic pregnancy in a caesarean scar. BJOG 113:1035–1038

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hwu YM, Hsu CY, Yang HY (2005) Conservative treatment of caesarean scar pregnancy with transvaginal needle aspiration of the embryo. BJOG 112:841–842

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ravhon A, Ben-Chetrit A, Rabinowitz R, Neuman M, Beller U (1997) Successful methotrexate treatment of a viable pregnancy within a thin uterine scar. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 104:628–629

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Sugawara J, Senoo M, Chisaka H, Yaegashi N, Okamura K (2005) Successful conservative treatment of a cesarean scar pregnancy with uterine artery embolization. Tohoku J Exp Med 206:261–265

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Jurkovic D, Ben-Nagi J, Ofilli-Yebovi D, Sawyer E, Helmy S, Yazbek J (2007) Efficacy of Shirodkar cervical suture in securing hemostasis following surgical evacuation of Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 30(95–100):24

    Google Scholar 

  21. Jiang T, Liu G, Huang L, Ma H, Zhang S (2011) Methotrexate therapy followed by suction curettage followed by Foley tamponade for caesarean scar pregnancy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 156:209–211

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Li C, Feng D, Jia C, Liu B, Zhan X (2011) Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization versus systemic methotrexate for the management of cesarean scar pregnancy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 113:178–182

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Yin X, Su S, Dong B, Ban Y, Li C, Sun B (2012) Angiographic uterine artery chemoembolization followed by vacuum aspiration: an efficient and safe treatment for managing complicated cesarean scar pregnancy. Arch Gynecol Obstet 285:1313–1318

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Bignardi T, Condous G (2010) Transrectal ultrasound-guided surgical evacuation of Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 35:481–485

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. He M, Chen MH, Xie HZ et al (2011) Transvaginal removal of ectopic pregnancy tissue and repair of uterine defect for caesarean scar pregnancy. BJOG 118:1136–1139

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peng-Hui Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Seow, KM., Wang, PH., Huang, LW. et al. Transvaginal sono-guided aspiration of gestational sac concurrent with a local methotrexate injection for the treatment of unruptured cesarean scar pregnancy. Arch Gynecol Obstet 288, 361–366 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-013-2765-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-013-2765-4

Keywords

Navigation