Skip to main content
Log in

Timing of thoracolomber spine stabilization in trauma patients; impact on neurological outcome and clinical course. A real prospective (rct) randomized controlled study

  • Trauma Surgery
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

Optimal timing of stabilization for spinal injuries is discussed controversially. The goal of this study is to investigate the neurological recovery and its influencing factors in thoracolumbar spine fractures after surgical decompression and stabilization within 8 h of spinal cord injury versus surgery which is performed between 3 and 15 days.

Methods

Twenty-seven patients undergoing thoracolumbar stabilization with neurological deficit for an acute thoracolumbar spinal injury at the level of Th8-L2 vertebra at Selcuk University between March 2004 and December 2006 were recorded. Patients with neurological deficity and medically stable for surgery underwent immediate stabilization within 8 h defined as group I (n = 12) and patients underwent operation in 3–15 days after thoracolumbar injury were defined as group II (n = 15). Patients were assessed for neurologic deficit and improvement as defined by the scoring system of American spinal injury association (ASIA).

Results

In spite of comparable demographic data, patients in group I had a significantly shorter overall hospital and intensive care unit stay and had lesser systemic complications such as pneumonia and also exhibited better neurological improvement than group II (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

Early surgery may improve neurological recovery and decrease hospitalization time and also additional systemic complications in patients with thoracolomber spinal cord injuries. Thus early stabilization of thoracolumbar spine fractures within 8 h after trauma appears to be favorable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jacobs RR, Casey MP (1984) Surgical management of thoracolumbar spinal injuries. Clin Orthop 189:22–35

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Magerl FP (1984) Stabilization of the lower thoracic and lumbar spine with external skeletal fixation. Clin Orthop 189:125–141

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Silvestro C, Francaviglia N, Bragazzi R, Viale GL (1992) Near anatomical reduction and stabilization of burst fractures of the lower thoracic or lumbar spine. Acta Neurochir 116:53–59

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Fehlings MG, Perrin RG (2005) The role and timing of early decompression for cervical spinal cord injury: update with a review of recent clinical evidence. Injury 2:13–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kerwin AJ, Frykberg ER, Schinco MA, Griffen MM, Murphy T, Tepas JJ (2005) The effect of early spine fixation on non-neurologic outcome. J Trauma 58:15–21

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mirza SK, Krengel WF 3rd, Chapman JR, Anderson PA, Bailey JC, Grady MS et al (1999) Early versus delayed surgery for acute cervical spinal cord injury. Clin Orthop Relat Res 359:104–114

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rath SA, Kahamba JF, Kretschmer T, Neff U, Richter HP, Antoniadis G (2005) Neurological recovery and its influencing factors in thoracic and lumbar spine fractures after surgical decompression and stabilization. Neurosurg Rev 28:44–52

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Schinkel C, Frangen TM, Kmetic A, Andress HJ, Muhr G (2006) Timing of thoracic spine stabilization in trauma patients: impact on clinical course and outcome. J Trauma 61:156–160

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Riska EB, von Bonsdorff H, Hakkinen S, Jaroma H, Kiviluoto O, Paavilainen T (1977) Primary operative fixation of long bone fractures in patients with multiple injuries. J Trauma 17:111–121

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Seibel R, LaDuca J, Hassett JM, Babikian G, Mills B, Border DO et al (1985) Blunt multiple trauma (ISS 36), femur traction, and the pulmonary failure-septic state. Ann Surg 202:283–295

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Aebi M, Mohler J, Zach GA, Morscher E (1986) Indication, surgical technique, and results of 100 surgically-treated fractures and fracture–dislocations of the cervical spine. Clin Orthop Relat Res 203:244–257

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Burke DC, Berryman D (1971) The place of closed manipulation in the management of flexion–rotation dislocations of the cervical spine. J Bone Joint Surg Br 53:165–182

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Krengel WF 3rd, Anderson PA, Henley MB (1993) Early stabilization and decompression for incomplete paraplegia due to a thoracic-level spinal cord injury. Spine 15:2080–2087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Marshall LF, Knowlton S, Garfin SR, Klauber MR, Eisenberg HM, Kopaniky D et al (1987) Deterioration following spinal cord injury. J Neurosurg 66:400–404

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Vaccaro AR, Daugherty RJ, Sheehan TP, Dante SJ, Cotler JM, Balderston RA et al (1997) Neurologic outcome of early versus late surgery for cervical spinal cord injury. Spine 15:2609–2613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Tator CH (2006) Review of treatment trials in human spinal cord injury: issues, difficulties, and recommendations. Neurosurgery 59:957–82

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tator CH (1996) Pathophysiology and pathology of spinal cord injury. In: Wilkins RH, Rengachary SS (eds) Neurosurgery. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 2847–2859

    Google Scholar 

  18. Leypold BG, Flanders AE, Schwartz ED, Burns AS (2007) The impact of methylprednisolone on lesion severity following spinal cord injury. Spine 32:373–378

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Magerl F, Aebi M, Gertzbein SD, Harms J, Nazarian SA (1994) Comprehensive classification of thoracic and lumbar injuries. Eur Spine J 3:184–201

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Harrop JS, Sharan A, Ratliff J (2006) Central cord injury: pathophysiology, management, and outcomes. Spine J 6:198–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Maynard FM Jr, Bracken MB, Creasey G, Ditunno JF Jr, Donovan WH, Ducker TB et al (1997) International standards for neurological and functional classification of spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 35:266–274

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bracken MB, Holford TR (1993) Effects of timing of methylprednisolone or naloxone administration on recovery of segmental and long-tract neurological function in NASCIS 2. J. Neurosurgery 79:500–507

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Delamarter RB, Sherman J, Carr JB (1995) Pathophysiology of spinal cord injury. Recovery after immediate and delayed decompression. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77:1042–1049

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Fehlings MG, Tator CH (1999) An evidence-based review of decompressive surgery in acute spinal cord injury: rationale, indications, and timing based on experimental and clinical studies. J Neurosurg 91:1–11

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Guha A, Tator CH, Endrenyi L, Piper I (1987) Decompression of the spinal cord improves recovery after acute experimental spinal cord compression injury. Paraplegia 25:324–339

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. McAfee PC, Bohlman HH, Yuan HA (1985) Anterior decompression of traumatic thoracolumbar fractures with incomplete neurological deficit using a retroperitoneal approach. J Bone Joint Surg Am 67:89–104

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Nystrom B, Berglund JE (1988) Spinal cord restitution following compression injuries in rats. Acta Neurol Scand 78:467–472

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Wagner FC Jr, Chehrazi B (1982) Early decompression and neurological outcome in acute cervical spinal cord injuries. J Neurosurg 56:699–705

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Wiberg J, Hauge HN (1988) Neurological outcome after surgery for thoracic and lumbar spine injuries. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 91:106–112

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Hadley MN, Fitzpatrick BC, Sonntag VK, Browner CM (1992) Facet fracture-dislocation injuries of the cervical spine. Neurosurgery 30:661–666

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Wolf A, Levi L, Mirvis S, Ragheb J, Huhn S, Rigamonti D et al (1991) Operative management of bilateral facet dislocation. J Neurosurg 75:883–890

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Dai LY, Wang XY, Jiang LS (2007) Neurologic recovery from thoracolumbar burst fractures: is it predicted by the amount of initial canal encroachment and kyphotic deformity? Surg Neurol 67:232–238

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Clohisy JC, Akbarnia BA, Bucholz RD, Burkus JK, Backer RJ (1992) Neurologic recovery associated with anterior decompression of spine fractures at the thoracolumbar junction (T1 2–L1). Spine 17:325–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Şahika Liva Cengiz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cengiz, Ş.L., Kalkan, E., Bayir, A. et al. Timing of thoracolomber spine stabilization in trauma patients; impact on neurological outcome and clinical course. A real prospective (rct) randomized controlled study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 128, 959–966 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-007-0518-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-007-0518-1

Keywords

Navigation