Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Ileal pouch–anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis: a Canadian institution’s experience

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Colorectal Disease Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

We aimed to summarize the outcomes of ulcerative colitis (UC) patients receiving an ileal pouch–anal anastamosis (IPAA) over an 11-year period at a high-volume Canadian inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) center.

Methods

A retrospective chart review was performed for subjects with UC who underwent IPAA between 2002 and 2013. Patient charts were reviewed for demographic data, clinical characteristics, preoperative medical treatment, and surgical outcomes. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression modeling were used to determine significant factors in postoperative outcomes.

Results

Seven hundred fifty-eight were included from the IBD database. The median age at the time of surgery was 37.1 (±12.1). Mean preoperative disease duration was 8.1 years (±8.7). Three hundred sixty-nine patients (48.7 %) had systemic corticosteroids (>15 mg/day) within 30 days prior to surgery. Of these, 286 patients had high dose (>30 mg/day) corticosteroids within 7 days of their first surgery. One hundred nine (14.0 %) IPAA procedures were performed laparoscopically. Pelvic pouches were created in traditional 2 (n = 460) and 3 (n = 285) stages; the remainder (n = 13) was performed in non-traditional staged operations. Early complications, defined as occurring within the same stay in hospital, consisted of pelvic abscess (n = 135, 17.8 %), small bowel obstruction (n = 134, 17.7 %), wound infection (n = 108, 14.3 %), and deep vein thrombosis (n = 33, 4.4 %). The overall pouch leak rate was 92 (12.1 %). There was one death in our study. The median length of stay was 10.3 days (SD6.0). Late complications, defined as occurring after discharge from hospital, consisted of anal stricture (n = 55, 7.3 %), pouch fistula (n = 26, 3.4 %), and functional pouch failure (n = 7, 0.9 %).

Conclusions

IPAA has been found to be a safe and effective method of surgical management of UC patients in a high-volume IBD center.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Heikens JT, de Vries J, van Laarhoven CJ (2012) Quality of life, health-related quality of life and health status in patients having restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis: a systematic review. Color Dis 14(5):536–544

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Parks AG (1988) Proctocolectomy without ileostomy for ulcerative colitis. Dis Colon rectum 31(10):826–830

  3. Heuschen UA, Heuschen G, Rudek B et al (1998) Long-term quality of life after continence-preserving proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis. Chirurg 69(10):1052–1058

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. McGuire BB, Brannigan AE, O'Connell PR (2007) Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Br J Surg 94(7):812–823

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kennedy ED, Rothwell DM, Cohen Z et al (2006) Increased experience and surgical technique lead to improved outcome after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: a population-based study. Dis Colon rectum 49(7):958–965

  6. Ahmed Ali U, Keus F, Heikens JT et al (2009) Open versus laparoscopic (assisted) ileo pouch anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1:CD006267

    Google Scholar 

  7. MacRae HM, McLeod RS, Cohen Z et al (1997) Risk factors for pelvic pouch failure. Dis Colon rectum 40(3):257–262

  8. Satsangi J, Silverberg MS, Vermeire S et al (2006) The Montreal classification of inflammatory bowel disease: controversies, consensus, and implications. Gut 55(6):749–753

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. de Zeeuw S, Ahmed Ali U, Ali UA et al (2012) Update of complications and functional outcome of the ileo-pouch anal anastomosis: overview of evidence and meta-analysis of 96 observational studies. Int J Color Dis 27(7):843–853

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Tekkis PP, Lovegrove RE, Tilney HS et al (2012) Long-term failure and function after restorative proctocolectomy—a multi-centre study of patients from the UK National Ileal Pouch Registry. Color Dis 12(5):433–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fazio VW, Kiran RP, Remzi FH et al (2013) Ileal pouch anal anastomosis: analysis of outcome and quality of life in 3707 patients. Ann Surg 257(4):679–685

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ikeuchi H, Uchino M, Matsuoka H et al (2010) Surgery for ulcerative colitis in 1,000 patients. Int J Color Dis 25(8):959–965

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Grace W. Ma.

Ethics declarations

Financial support

None.

Additional information

E. Zittan and Grace W. Ma contributed equally as lead authors.

M. Silverberg and Z. Cohen are both senior authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zittan, E., Ma, G.W., Wong-Chong, N. et al. Ileal pouch–anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis: a Canadian institution’s experience. Int J Colorectal Dis 32, 281–285 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-016-2670-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-016-2670-y

Keywords

Navigation