Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Porcine dermal collagen (Permacol®) for chest and abdominal wall reconstruction in thoraco-omphalopagus conjoined twin separation

  • Technical Innovation
  • Published:
Pediatric Surgery International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Each set of conjoined twins presents a unique challenge, which centers on the ability to separate and if necessary reconstruct shared organs and to achieve subsequent skin cover of the often very large residual defect after completion of the separation. This report describes the use of a bioprosthetic Permacol® derived from porcine dermal collagen to reconstruct the chest and abdominal wall.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Doski JJ, Heiman HS, Solenberger RI et al (1997) Successful separation of ischiopagus tripus conjoined twins with comparative analysis of methods for abdominal wall closure and use of the tripus limb. J Pediatr Surg 32:1761–1766

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kaufman MH (2004) The embryology of conjoined twins. Childs Nerv Syst 20:508–525

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cywes S, Millar AJ, Rode H, Brown RA (1997) Conjoined twins—the Cape Town experience. Pediatr Surg Int 12:234–248

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Millar AJW, Rode H, Thomas J, Hewitson J (2009) Thoracopagus conjoined twins. In: Parikh DH, Crabbe DC, Auldist AW, Rothenberg SS (eds) Pediatric thoracic surgery. Springer, London, pp 557–569

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Rode H, Fieggen AG, Brown RA et al (2006) Four decades of conjoined twins at Red Cross Children’s Hospital—lessons learned. S Afr Med J 96:931–940

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hilfiker ML, Hart M, Holmes R et al (1998) Expansion and division of conjoined twins. J Pediatr Surg 33:768–770

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Zuker RM, Filler RM, Lalla R (1986) Intra-abdominal tissue expansion: an adjunct in the separation of conjoined twins. J Pediatr Surg 21:1198–1200

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Dasgupta R, Wales PW, Zuker RM, Fisher DM, Langer JC (2007) The use of Surgisis for abdominal wall reconstruction in the separation of omphalopagus conjoined twins. Pediatr Surg Int 23:923–926

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kelly DA, Rockwell WB, Siddiqi F (2009) Pelvic and abdominal wall reconstruction using human acellular dermis in the separation of ischiopagus tripus conjoined twins. Ann Plast Surg 62:417–420

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hiles M, Record Ritchie RD, Altizer AM (2009) Are biologic grafts effective for hernia repair?: a systematic review of the literature. Surg Innov 16:26–37

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hsu PW, Salgado CJ, Kent K et al (2008) Evaluation of porcine dermal collagen (Permacol) used in abdominal wall reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg (in press)

  12. Shaikh FM, Giri SK, Durrani S, Waldron D, Grace PA (2007) Experience with porcine acellular dermal collagen implant in one-stage tension-free reconstruction of acute and chronic abdominal wall defects. World J Surg 31:1966–1972. Discussion 1973–1964, 1975

    Google Scholar 

  13. Baillie DR, Stawicki SP, Eustance N, Warsaw D, Desai D (2007) Use of human and porcine dermal-derived bioprostheses in complex abdominal wall reconstructions: a literature review and case report. Ostomy Wound Manage 53:30–37

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Parker DM, Armstrong PJ, Frizzi JD, North JH Jr (2006) Porcine dermal collagen (Permacol) for abdominal wall reconstruction. Curr Surg 63:255–258

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Liyanage SH, Purohit GS, Frye JN, Giordano P (2006) Anterior abdominal wall reconstruction with a Permacol implant. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 59:553–555

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Pentlow A, Smart NJ, Richards SK, Inward CD, Morgan JD (2008) The use of porcine dermal collagen implants in assisting abdominal wall closure of pediatric renal transplant recipients with donor size discrepancy. Pediatr Transplant 12:20–23

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mitchell IC, Garcia NM, Barber R, Ahmad N, Hicks BA, Fischer AC (2008) Permacol: a potential biologic patch alternative in congenital diaphragmatic hernia repair. J Pediatr Surg 43:2161–2164

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Harper C (2001) Permacol: clinical experience with a new biomaterial. Hosp Med 62:90–95

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gaertner WB, Bonsack ME, Delaney JP (2007) Experimental evaluation of four biologic prostheses for ventral hernia repair. J Gastrointest Surg 11:1275–1285

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Wilshaw SP, Burke D, Fisher J, Ingham E (2009) Investigation of the antiadhesive properties of human mesothelial cells cultured in vitro on implantable surgical materials. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 88:49–60

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Adedeji OA, Bailey CA, Varma JS (2002) Porcine dermal collagen graft in abdominal-wall reconstruction. Br J Plast Surg 55:85–86

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Dr. A. Brooks and Dr. J. Hewitson from Department of Pediatric Cardiac Surgery and Prof. A. Numanoglu, Department of Pediatric Surgery who participated in the surgery. Prof. J. Thomas, Department of Pediatric Anesthesia, who led the anesthetic team and provided the photos used.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonathan Saul Karpelowsky.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Karpelowsky, J.S., Millar, A.J.W. Porcine dermal collagen (Permacol®) for chest and abdominal wall reconstruction in thoraco-omphalopagus conjoined twin separation. Pediatr Surg Int 26, 315–318 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-009-2501-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-009-2501-0

Keywords

Navigation