Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Tight filum terminale syndrome in children: analysis based on positioning of the conus and absence or presence of lumbosacral lipoma

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Child's Nervous System Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Tight filum terminale syndrome (TFTS) characterized by findings consistent with a tethered cord but with the conus ending in a normal position has only recently been observed in children. In this situation, diagnosis may prove difficult and sectioning of the filum terminale is questionable.

Materials and methods

Sixty cases of pediatric TFTS were analyzed by methods including spinal X-ray and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Twenty-one patients exhibited a normally positioned conus, 18 a low-lying conus, and 21 a low-lying conus with accompanying lumbosacral lipoma. These three groups were compared preoperatively and postoperatively for lumbosacral cutaneous stigmata, vertebral anomalies, concomitant congenital spinal dysraphisms, lower limb deformities, and sphincter dysfunction.

Results

Rates of occurrence of lumbosacral cutaneous stigmata and other concomitant congenital spinal dysraphisms differed significantly among the groups. Differences in other parameters were not observed. All groups responded positively to surgery.

Conclusions

Pediatric TFTS may involve a normally positioned conus. Diagnosis of pediatric TFTS should be based on clinical presentation, physical and radiological examinations, MRI, and pathologic changes in the filum. When neurological signs accompany such changes, early severing of the filum is indicated regardless of conus position.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barson AJ (1970) The vertebral level of termination of the spinal cord during normal and abnormal development. J Anat 106:489–497

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hendrick EB, Hoffman HJ, Humphreys RP (1983) The tethered spinal cord. Clin Neurosurg 30:457–463

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hoffman HJ, Hendrick EB, Humphreys RP (1976) The tethered spinal cord: its protean manifestations, diagnosis and surgical correction. Childs Brain 2:145–155

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Huttmann S, Krauss J, Collmann H, Sorensen N, Roosen K (2001) Surgical management of tethered spinal cord in adults: report of 54 cases. J Neurosurg 95:173–178

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Iskandar BJ, Fulmer BB, Hadley MN, Oakes WJ (2001) Congenital tethered spinal cord syndrome in adults. Neurosurg Focus 10:e7

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Khoury AE, Hendrick EB, McLorie GA, Kulkarni A, Churchill BM (1990) Occult spinal dysraphism: clinical and urodynamic outcome after division of the filum terminale. J Urol 144:426–428

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Komagata M, Endo K, Nishiyama M, Ikegami H, Imakiire A (2004) Management of tight filum terminale. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 47:49–53

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Naidich TP, McLone DG (1985) Ultrasonography versus computed tomography. In: Holtzman RN, Stein BM (eds) The tethered spinal cord. Thieme-Stratton, New York, pp 47–58

    Google Scholar 

  9. Nan B, Jin HM, Sun LP, Gu S, Shi CR (2002) Tight filum terminale syndrome in children: analyses of diagnosis and treatment. Chinese Journal of Nervous and Mental Diseases 28:354–356

    Google Scholar 

  10. Pang D, Wilberger JE Jr (1982) Tethered cord syndrome in adults. J Neurosurg 57:32–47

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Reimann AF, Anson BJ (1944) Vertebral level of termination of the spinal cord with a report of a case of sacral cord. Anat Rec 88:127–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Satar N, Bauer SB, Shefner J, Kelly MD, Darbey MM (1995) The effects of delayed diagnosis and treatment in patients with an occult spinal dysraphism. J Urol 154:754–758

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Selcuki M, Coskun K (1998) Management of tight filum terminale syndrome with special emphasis on normal level conus medullaris (NLCM). Surg Neurol 50:318–322

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Tani S, Yamada S, Knighton RS (1987) Extensibility of the lumbar and sacral cord. Pathophysiology of the tethered spinal cord in cats. J Neurosurg 66:116–123

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Wehby MC, O’Hollaren PS, Abtin K, Hume JL, Richards BJ (2004) Occult tight filum terminale syndrome: results of surgical untethering. Pediatr Neurosurg 40:51–57

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Yamada S, Knerium DS, Mandybur GM, Schultz RL, Yamada BS (2004) Pathophysiology of tethered cord syndrome and other complex factors. Neurol Res 26:722–726

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Yamada S, Zinke DE, Sanders D (1981) Pathophysiology of “tethered cord syndrome”. J Neurosurg 54:494–503

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cheng-Ren Shi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bao, N., Chen, ZH., Gu, S. et al. Tight filum terminale syndrome in children: analysis based on positioning of the conus and absence or presence of lumbosacral lipoma. Childs Nerv Syst 23, 1129–1134 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-007-0376-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-007-0376-8

Keywords

Navigation