Skip to main content
Log in

Social threshold aggregations

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Social Choice and Welfare Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A problem of axiomatic construction of a social decision function is studied for the case when individual opinions of agents are given as m-graded preferences with arbitrary integer m ≥ 3. It is shown that the only rule satisfying the introduced axioms of Pairwise Compensation, Pareto Domination and Noncompensatory Threshold and Contraction is the threshold rule.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aizerman M, Aleskerov F (1995) Theory of choice. North-Holland, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Aleskerov F (1999) Arrovian aggregation models. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Aleskerov FT, Chistyakov VV (2008) Aggregating m-graded preferences: axiomatics and algorithms. In: Talk at the 9th international meeting of the society for social choice and welfare, Montreal, Concordia University, Canada, June 19–22, 2008

  • Aleskerov FT, Yakuba VI (2003) A method for aggregation of rankings of special form. In: Abstracts of the 2nd international conference on control problems. IPU RAN, Moscow, Russia, p 116

  • Aleskerov FT, Yakuba VI (2007) A method for threshold aggregation of three-grade rankings. Dokl Math 75:322–324 [Russian original: Dokl Akad Nauk 413:181–183]

    Google Scholar 

  • Aleskerov F, Yakuba V, Yuzbashev D (2007) A ‘threshold aggregation’ of three-graded rankings. Math Social Sci 53: 106–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aleskerov F, Chistyakov VV, Kalyagin V (2010) The threshold aggregation. Econ Lett 107(2): 261–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arrow KJ (1963) Social choice and individual values. 2nd ed. Yale University Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Austen-Smith D, Banks J (1999) Positive political theory I: collective preferences. University of Michigan Press, East Lancing

    Google Scholar 

  • Brams SJ, Fishburn PC (2002) Voting procedures. In: Arrow KJ, Sen AK, Suzumura K (eds) Handbook of social choice and welfare, vol 1, 1st edn, Chap 4. Elsevier, pp 173–236

  • Chistyakov VV, Kalyagin VA (2008) A model of noncompensatory aggregation with an arbitrary collection of grades. Dokl Math 78:617–620 [Russian original: Dokl Akad Nauk 421:607–610]

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishburn PC (1973) The theory of social choice. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham RL, Knuth DE, Patashnik O (1994) Concrete mathematics. A foundation for computer science. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading

    Google Scholar 

  • May KO (1952) A set of independent, necessary and sufficient conditions for simple majority decision. Econometrica 20(4): 680–684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moulin H (1988) Axioms of cooperative decision making. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith JH (1973) Aggregation of preferences with variable electorate. Econometrica 41(6): 1027–1041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young HP (1974a) A note on preference aggregation. Econometrica 42(6): 1129–1131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young HP (1974b) An axiomatization of Borda’s rule. J Econ Theory 9(1): 43–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young HP (1975) Social choice scoring functions. SIAM J Appl Math 28(4): 824–838

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fuad T. Aleskerov.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aleskerov, F.T., Chistyakov, V.V. & Kalyagin, V.A. Social threshold aggregations. Soc Choice Welf 35, 627–646 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-010-0454-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-010-0454-9

Keywords

Navigation