Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Radiation Dose Reduction in CT Fluoroscopy-Guided Cervical Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injection by Modifying Scout and Planning Steps

  • Clinical Investigation
  • Published:
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and Purpose

In CT fluoroscopy (CTF)-guided cervical transforaminal epidural steroid injection (TFESI), the majority of radiation dose is contributed by the planning CT scan rather than the CTF procedure itself. We replaced the planning helical CT with a spot CTF and accordingly changed the patient posture during scout and planning scans. The aim of this study was to test whether radiation dose reduction would be achieved by this protocol modification while still maintaining technical performance.

Methods

Overall, 338 consecutive procedures before (control group: n = 163) and after (study group: n = 175) instituting the above-mentioned protocol modification were analyzed retrospectively, comparing patient characteristics (age, sex, neck diameter, and level injected) and technical performance [technical success rate, dose-length product (DLP), inadvertent contrast flow incidence, number of CTF acquisitions, and procedural time] between the two groups.

Results

All injections were technically successful at every level from C3–C4 to C7–T1 without serious complications in both groups. The median DLP of the study group (7.92 mGy·cm) was significantly reduced compared to that of the control group (39.05 mGy·cm, P < 0.001). There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding the incidence of inadvertent contrast flow (20.6 vs. 17.2 %, P = 0.426), number of CTF acquisitions (median 5 vs. 4, P = 0.123), and the procedural time (median 6.62 vs. 6.90 min, P = 0.100).

Conclusions

When conducting CTF-guided cervical TFESIs, a significant radiation dose reduction (median 79.7 % in DLP) can be achieved by modifying scout and planning steps, without compromising the technical performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Strobel K, Pfirrmann CWA, Schmid M, Hodler J, Boos N, Zanetti M. Cervical nerve root blocks: indications and role of MR imaging. Radiology. 2004;233:87–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cyteval C, Thomas E, Decoux E, Sarrabere M-P, Cottin A, Blotman F, et al. Cervical radiculopathy: open study on percutaneous periradicular foraminal steroid infiltration performed under CT control in 30 patients. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2004;25:441–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hoang JK, Apostol MA, Kranz PG, Kilani RK, Taylor JN, Gray L, et al. CT fluoroscopy-assisted cervical transforaminal steroid injection: tips, traps, and use of contrast material. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;195:888–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hoang JK, Massoglia DP, Apostol MA, Lascola CD, Eastwood JD, Kranz PG. CT-guided cervical transforaminal steroid injections: where should the needle tip be located? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2013;34:688–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kim H, Lee SH, Kim MH. Multislice CT fluoroscopy-assisted cervical transforaminal injection of steroids: technical note. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2007;20:456–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sutter R, Pfirrmann CWA, Zanetti M, Hodler J, Peterson CK. CT-guided cervical nerve root injections: comparing the immediate post-injection anesthetic-related effects of the transforaminal injection with a new indirect technique. Skeletal Radiol. 2011;40:1603–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Furman MB, Giovanniello MT, O’Brien EM. Incidence of intravascular penetration in transforaminal cervical epidural steroid injections. Spine. 2003;28:21–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Malhotra G, Abbasi A, Rhee M. Complications of transforaminal cervical epidural steroid injections. Spine. 2009;34:731–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rathmell JP, Aprill C, Bogduk N. Cervical transforaminal injection of steroids. Anesthesiology. 2004;100:1595–600.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wagner AL. CT fluoroscopic-guided cervical nerve root blocks. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2005;26:43–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wolter T, Knoeller S, Berlis A, Hader C. CT-guided cervical selective nerve root block with a dorsal approach. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2010;31:1831–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hoang JK, Yoshizumi TT, Toncheva G, Gray L, Gafton AR, Huh BK, et al. Radiation dose exposure for lumbar spine epidural steroid injections: a comparison of conventional fluoroscopy data and CT fluoroscopy techniques. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;197:778–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sarti M, Brehmer WP, Gay SB. Low-dose techniques in CT-guided interventions. Radiographics. 2012;32:1109–19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Paik NC. Radiation dose reduction in CT fluoroscopy-guided lumbar interlaminar epidural steroid injection by minimizing preliminary planning imaging. Eur Radiol. 2014;24:2109–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cho CH. Cervical nerve injection: computed tomography guidance with intravenous contrast and extraforaminal needle placement. Series of seven consecutive case reports. Spine J. 2010;10:e1–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Miller TS, Fruauff K, Farinhas J, Pasquale D, Romano C, Schoenfeld AH, et al. Lateral decubitus positioning for cervical nerve root block using CT image guidance minimizes effective radiation dose and procedural time. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2013;34:23–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kranz PG, Raduazo P, Gray L, Kilani RK, Hoang JK. CT fluoroscopy-guided cervical interlaminar steroid injections: safety, technique, and radiation dose parameters. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2012;33(7):1221–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Eckel TS, Bartynski WS. Epidural steroid injections and selective nerve root blocks. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol. 2009;12(1):11–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Leng S, Christner JA, Carlson SK, Jacobsen M, Vrieze TJ, Atwell TD, et al. Radiation dose levels for interventional CT procedures. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;197:W97–103.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Wald JT, Maus TP, Geske JR, Carter RE, Diehn FE, Kaufmann TJ, et al. Safety and efficacy of CT-guided transforaminal cervical epidural steroid injections using a posterior approach. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2012;33:415–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Fenton DS, Czervionke LF. Selective nerve root block. In: Fenton DS, Czervionke LF, editors. Image-guided spine intervention. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2003. p. 73–98.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Bauhs JA, Vrieze TJ, Primak AN, Bruesewitz MR, McCollough CH. CT dosimetry: comparison of measurement techniques and devices. Radiographics. 2008;28:245–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. McCollough CH, Leng S, Yu L, Cody DD, Boone JM, McNitt-Gray MF. CT dose index and patient dose: they are not the same thing. Radiology. 2011;259:311–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Simpson AK, Whang PG, Jonisch A, Haims A, Grauer JN. The radiation exposure associated with cervical and lumbar spine radiographs. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2008;21:409–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. Report No. 160—Ionizing radiation exposure of the population of the United States. Bethesda, MD. 2009

  26. Narouze SN, Vydyanathan A, Kapural L, Sessler DI, Mekhail N. Ultrasound-guided cervical selective nerve root block: a fluoroscopy-controlled feasibility study. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2009;34:343–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Jee H, Lee JH, Kim J, Park KD, Lee WY, Park Y. Ultrasound-guided selective nerve root block versus fluoroscopy-guided transforaminal block for the treatment of radicular pain in the lower cervical spine: a randomized, blinded, controlled study. Skeletal Radiol. 2013;42:69–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Lee SH, Kim JM, Chan V, Kim HJ, Kim HI. Ultrasound-guided cervical periradicular steroid injection for cervical radicular pain: relevance of spread pattern and degree of penetration of contrast medium. Pain Med. 2013;14:5–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiology, Arumdaun Wooldul Spine Hospital, 647-4 Sinjeong 2-dong, Nam-gu, Ulsan, 680-828, Republic of Korea

    Nam Chull Paik

Authors
  1. Nam Chull Paik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nam Chull Paik.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares that he has no conflicts of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

For this type of study, formal consent is not required.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Paik, N.C. Radiation Dose Reduction in CT Fluoroscopy-Guided Cervical Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injection by Modifying Scout and Planning Steps. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 39, 591–599 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-015-1230-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-015-1230-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation