Skip to main content
Log in

Facelift Approach for Resecting Benign Upper Neck Masses

  • Original Scientific Report
  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

This study evaluated the feasibility of non-magnified resection of various benign lesions of the upper neck using the facelift incision without endoscopic equipment to establish indications for the procedure.

Methods

This retrospective analysis examined 86 patients who underwent surgery for upper neck masses using the facelift incision or conventional transcervical incision at our institute between January 2012 and December 2015.

Results

We performed 41 operations using facelift incisions (facelift group) and 45 using conventional horizontal incisions (conventional group). All 86 operations were successful. In the facelift group, no patient needed conversion to conventional open resection and no patient required the use of an endoscopic device due to a limited surgical view for safe resection. There were no major surgical complications in either group. Transient sensory changes in the auricle occurred in 26% of the patients in the facelift group, but all patients recovered within 2 months. In all patients in the facelift group, the scars were invisible as they were covered by the auricle and hair, while the surgical scars were noticeable in 91% (41/45) of the patients in the conventional group when they were wearing standard shirts (p < 0.001) at 3–4 weeks after surgery.

Conclusions

The facelift approach provides a short direct route to upper neck masses, and it enables an adequate workspace not only for endoscopic or robotic surgery, but also for open surgery with the naked eye. The surgical indications for the facelift incision include the removal of most benign tumors occurring in the upper neck at levels II and III.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kang SW, Lee SC, Lee SH et al (2009) Robotic thyroid surgery using a gasless, transaxillary approach and the da Vinci S system: the operative outcomes of 338 consecutive patients. Surgery 146(6):1048–1055

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kang SW, Jeong JJ, Nam KH et al (2009) Robot-assisted endoscopic thyroidectomy for thyroid malignancies using a gasless transaxillary approach. J Am Coll Surg 209(2):e1–e7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kang SW, Jeong JJ, Yun JS et al (2009) Robot-assisted endoscopic surgery for thyroid cancer: experience with the first 100 patients. Surg Endosc 23(11):2399–2406

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Byeon HK, Holsinger FC, Tufano RP et al (2016) Endoscopic retroauricular thyroidectomy: preliminary results. Surg Endosc 30(1):355–365

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Park JO, Kim SY, Chun BJ et al (2015) Endoscope-assisted facelift thyroid surgery: an initial experience using a new endoscopic technique. Surg Endosc 29(6):1469–1475

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bomeli SR, Duke WS, Terris DJ et al (2015) Robotic facelift thyroid surgery. Gland Surg 4(5):403–409

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Terris DJ, Singer MC, Seybt MW et al (2011) Robotic facelift thyroidectomy: II Clinical feasibility and safety. Laryngoscope 121(8):1636–1641

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Terris DJ, Singer MC (2012) Qualitative and quantitative differences between 2 robotic thyroidectomy techniques. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Off j Am Acad Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 147(1):20–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lee HS, Lee D, Koo YC et al (2013) Endoscopic resection of upper neck masses via retroauricular approach is feasible with excellent cosmetic outcomes. J Oral Maxillofac Surg Off J Am Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 71(3):520–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen LS, Sun W, Wu PN et al (2012) Endoscope-assisted versus conventional second branchial cleft cyst resection. Surg Endosc 26(5):1397–1402

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Park YM, Byeon HK, Chung HP et al (2013) Robotic resection of benign neck masses via a retroauricular approach. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech Part A 23(7):578–583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Roh JL (2005) Retroauricular hairline incision for removal of upper neck masses. Laryngoscope 115(12):2161–2166

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Yoo H, Chae BJ, Park HS et al (2012) Comparison of surgical outcomes between endoscopic and robotic thyroidectomy. J Surg Oncol 105(7):705–708

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jun-Ook Park.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Park, JO. Facelift Approach for Resecting Benign Upper Neck Masses. World J Surg 41, 1488–1493 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-017-3873-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-017-3873-2

Keywords

Navigation