Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Risk Factors and Clinical Outcomes of Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve Paralysis After Esophagectomy for Thoracic Esophageal Carcinoma

  • Original Scientific Report
  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The objectives of this study were to assess the incidence of recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis (RLNP) using laryngoscopy after esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal carcinoma and to clarify the risk factors influencing postoperative RLNP.

Methods

A total of 299 patients who underwent laryngoscopic examination after esophagectomy were retrospectively reviewed. Patients who were found to have postoperative RLNP were followed up every 1–3 months, with a median follow-up period of 3 months. Recovery from paralysis was also evaluated on the basis of each affected nerve. Multivariate analyses using logistic regression were used to identify independent risk factors for RLNP. Cumulative recovery rate was calculated using Kaplan–Meier method.

Results

A total of 178 (59.5 %) patients were diagnosed with RLNP by first laryngoscopy [bilateral in 59 (33.1 %) patients, right in 15 (8.4 %), and left in 104 (58.4 %)]. In 206 patients who underwent transthoracic and thoracoscopic esophagectomy, independent risk factors for RLNP were lymph node dissection along the right RLN (odds ratio [OR] 3.01, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.06–8.54, P = 0.04) and cervical anastomosis (OR 5.94, 95 % CI 1.78–19.80, P < 0.01). Cumulative recovery rate from RLNP was 61.7 % at 12 months after esophagectomy with 91 nerves eventually recovering from paralysis. Median recovery time was 6 months.

Conclusions

RLNP developed in 60 % of patients after esophagectomy and may be associated with lymphadenectomy around the right RLN and cervical esophageal mobilization. Although 62 % of affected nerves recovered within 12 months, great attention should be given when performing these procedures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gelpke H, Grieder F, Decurtins M et al (2010) Recurrent laryngeal nerve monitoring during esophagectomy and mediastinal lymph node dissection. World J Surg 34:2379–2382. doi:10.1007/s00268-010-0692-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Pertl L, Zacherl J, Mancusi G et al (2011) High risk of unilateral recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis after esophagectomy using cervical anastomosis. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 268:1605–1610

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Gockel I, Kneist W, Keilmann A et al (2005) Recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis (RLNP) following esophagectomy for carcinoma. Eur J Surg Oncol 31:277–281

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Suda K, Ishida Y, Kawamura Y et al (2012) Robot-assisted thoracoscopic lymphadenectomy along the left recurrent laryngeal nerve for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in the prone position: technical report and short-term outcomes. World J Surg 36:1608–1616. doi:10.1007/s00268-012-1538-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Noshiro H, Iwasaki H, Kobayashi K et al (2010) Lymphadenectomy along the left recurrent laryngeal nerve by a minimally invasive esophagectomy in the prone position for thoracic esophageal cancer. Surg Endosc 24:2965–2973

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Nishimaki T, Suzuki T, Suzuki S et al (1998) Outcomes of extended radical esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer. J Am Coll Surg 186:306–312

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Baba M, Aikou T, Yoshinaka H et al (1994) Long-term results of subtotal esophagectomy with three-field lymphadenectomy for carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus. Ann Surg 219:310–316

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Tachibana M, Kinugasa S, Yoshimura H et al (2005) Clinical outcomes of extended esophagectomy with three-field lymph node dissection for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Am J Surg 189:98–109

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fujita H, Kakegawa T, Yamana H et al (1995) Mortality and morbidity rates, postoperative course, quality of life, and prognosis after extended radical lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer. Comparison of three-field lymphadenectomy with two-field lymphadenectomy. Ann Surg 222:654–662

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Walther B, Johansson J, Johnsson F et al (2003) Cervical or thoracic anastomosis after esophageal resection and gastric tube reconstruction: a prospective randomized trial comparing sutured neck anastomosis with stapled intrathoracic anastomosis. Ann Surg 238:803–814

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Yu Y, Wang Z, Liu XY et al (2010) Therapeutic efficacy comparison of two surgical procedures to treat middle thoracic esophageal carcinoma. World J Surg 34:272–276. doi:10.1007/s00268-009-0341-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Griffin SM, Shaw IH, Dresner SM (2002) Early complications after Ivor Lewis subtotal esophagectomy with two-field lymphadenectomy: risk factors and management. J Am Coll Surg 194:285–297

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Orringer MB, Marshall B, Chang AC et al (2007) Two thousand transhiatal esophagectomies: changing trends, lessons learned. Ann Surg 246:363–374

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Yannopoulos P, Theodoridis P, Manes K (2009) Esophagectomy without thoracotomy: 25 years of experience over 750 patients. Langenbecks Arch Surg 394:611–616

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Hulscher JB, van Sandick JW, Devriese PP et al (1999) Vocal cord paralysis after subtotal oesophagectomy. Br J Surg 86:1583–1587

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Johnson PR, Kanegoanker GS, Bates T (1994) Indirect laryngoscopic evaluation of vocal cord function in patients undergoing transhiatal esophagectomy. J Am Coll Surg 178:605–608

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Akiyama H, Tsurumaru M, Udagawa H et al (1994) Radical lymph node dissection for cancer of the thoracic esophagus. Ann Surg 220:364–373

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Sharma S, Fujita H, Yamana H et al (1994) Patterns of lymph node metastasis in 3-field dissection for carcinoma in the thoracic esophagus. Surg Today 24:410–414

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Taniyama Y, Nakamura T, Mitamura A et al (2013) A strategy for supraclavicular lymph node dissection using recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph node status in thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Ann Thorac Surg 95:1930–1937

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Nishihira T, Hirayama K, Mori S (1998) A prospective randomized trial of extended cervical and superior mediastinal lymphadenectomy for carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus. Am J Surg 175:47–51

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Sobin LH, Gospodarowicz MK, Wittekind C (2009) UICC International Union Against Cancer, TNM classification of malignant tumors, 7th edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  22. Japan Esophageal Society (2008) Japanese Classification of Esophageal Cancer, 10th edn. Kanehara, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  23. Baba M, Natsugoe S, Shimada M et al (1999) Does hoarseness of voice from recurrent nerve paralysis after esophagectomy for carcinoma influence patient quality of life? J Am Coll Surg 188:231–236

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Wright CD, Zeitels SM (2006) Recurrent laryngeal nerve injuries after esophagectomy. Thorac Surg Clin 16:23–33

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Digestive and General Surgery, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Asahimachi-dori 1-757, Chuo-ku, Niigata, 951-8510, Japan

    Yu Sato, Shin-ichi Kosugi, Takashi Ishikawa, Yosuke Kano, Hiroshi Ichikawa, Takaaki Hanyu, Kotaro Hirashima, Takeo Bamba & Toshifumi Wakai

  2. Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Niigata University Faculty of Medicine, Niigata, Japan

    Naotaka Aizawa

Authors
  1. Yu Sato
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shin-ichi Kosugi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Naotaka Aizawa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Takashi Ishikawa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yosuke Kano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Hiroshi Ichikawa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Takaaki Hanyu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Kotaro Hirashima
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Takeo Bamba
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Toshifumi Wakai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yu Sato.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

There are no conflicts of interest that should be disclosed.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sato, Y., Kosugi, Si., Aizawa, N. et al. Risk Factors and Clinical Outcomes of Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve Paralysis After Esophagectomy for Thoracic Esophageal Carcinoma. World J Surg 40, 129–136 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-015-3261-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-015-3261-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation