Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Surgical Correction of Gynecomastia in Thin Patients

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Gynecomastia refers to a benign enlargement of the male breast. This article describes the authors’ method of using power-assisted liposuction and gland removal through a subareolar incision for thin patients.

Methods

Power-assisted liposuction is performed for removal of fatty breast tissue in the chest area to allow skin retraction. The subareolar incision is used to remove glandular tissue from a male subject considered to be within a normal weight range but who has bilateral grade 1 or 2 gynecomastia.

Results

Gynecomastia correction was successfully performed for all the patients. The average volume of aspirated fat breast was 100–200 ml on each side. Each breast had 5–80 g of breast tissue removed. At the 3-month, 6-month, and 1-year follow-up assessments, all the treated patients were satisfied with their aesthetic results.

Conclusions

Liposuction has the advantages of reducing the fat tissue where necessary to allow skin retraction and of reducing the traces left by surgery. The combination of surgical excision and power-assisted lipoplasty also is a valid choice for the treatment of thin patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Neuman JF (1997) Evaluation and treatment of gynecomastia. Am Fam Physician 55:1835–1844

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Braunstein GD (1993) Gynecomastia. N Engl J Med 328:490–495

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Nydick M, Bustos J, Dale JH Jr, Rawson RW (1961) Gynecomastia in adolescent boys. JAMA 178:449–454

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Styne DM (2004) Pediatric endocrinology. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, p 191

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mahoney CP (1990) Adolescent gynecomastia differential diagnosis and management. Pediatr Clin North Am 37:1389–1404

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lee PA (1975) The relationship of concentration of serum hormones to pubertal gynecomastia. J Pediatr 86:212–215

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Mathur R, Braunstein GD (1997) Gynecomastia: pathomechanisms and treatment strategies. Horm Res 48:95–102

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Williams MJ (1963) Gynecomastia: its incidence, recognition, and host characterization in 447 autopsy cases. Am J Med 34:103–112

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bannayan GA, Hajdu SI (1972) Gynecomastia: clinicopathologic study of 351 cases. Am J Clin Pathol 57:431–437

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Andersen JA, Gram JB (1982) Gynecomasty: histological aspects in a surgical material. Acta Pathol Microbiol Immunol Scand 90:185–190

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Nicolis GL, Modlinger RS, Gabrilove JL (1971) A study of the histopathology of human gynecomastia. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 32:173–178

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Simon BE, Hoffman S, Kahn S (1973) Classification and surgical correction for gynecomastia. Plast Reconstr Surg 51:48–52

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ha RJ, Rohrich RJ, Kenkel JM (2005) Treatment of gynecomastia. In: Nahai F (ed) The art of aesthetic surgery: principles and techniques. Quality Medical Publishing Inc, St. Louis, p 2045e74

  14. Webster JP (1946) Mastectomy for gynecomastia through a semicircular intraareolar incision. Ann Surg 124:557–575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Prado AC, Castillo PF (2005) Minimal surgical access to treat gynecomastia with the use of a power-assisted arthroscopic–endoscopic cartilage shaver. Plast Reconstr Surg 115:939–942

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Benito-Ruiz J, Raigosa M, Manzano M, Salvador L (2009) Assessment of a suction-assisted cartilage shaver plus liposuction for the treatment of gynecomastia. Aesthet Surg J 29:302–309

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hammond DC (2009) Surgical correction of gynecomastia. Plast Reconstr Surg 124:61e–68e

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Klein JA (1990) Tumescent technique for regional anesthesia permits lidocaine doses of 35 mg/kg for liposuction. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 16:248–263

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Petty PM, Solomon M, Buchel EW, Tran NV (2010) Gynecomastia: evolving paradigm of management and comparison of techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg 125:1301–1308

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Daniels IR, Layer GT (2001) Gynaecomastia. Eur J Surg 167:885–892

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Pitanguy I (1966) Transareolar incision for gynecomastia. Plast Reconstr Surg 38:414–419

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Saad MN, Kay S (1984) The circumareolar incision: a useful incision for gynaecomastia. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 66:121–122

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Persichetti P, Berloco M, Casadei RM, Marangi GF, Di Lella F, Nobili AM (2001) Gynecomastia and the complete circumareolar approach in the surgical management of skin redundancy. Plast Reconstr Surg 107:948–954

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Scuderi N, Dessy LA, Tempesta M, Bistoni G, Mazzocchi M (2010) Combined use of power-assisted liposuction and transareolar incision for gynaecomastia treatment. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 63:e93–e95

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Gikas P, Mokbel K (2007) Management of gynaecomastia: an update. Int J Clin Pract 61:1209–1215

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Samdal F, Kleppe G, Amland PF, Abyholm F (1994) Surgical treatment of gynaecomastia: five years experience with liposuction. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand 28:123–130

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Hodgson ELB, Fruhstorfer BH, Malata CM (2005) Ultrasonic liposuction in the treatment of gynaecomastia. Plast Reconstr Surg 116:646–653

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Fodor PB, Vogt PA (1999) Power-assisted lipoplasty (PAL): a clinical pilot study comparing PAL to traditional lipoplasty (TL). Aesthetic Plast Surg 23:379

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Scuderi N, Paolini G, Grippaudo FR, Tenna S (2000) Comparative evaluation of traditional, ultrasonic, and pneumatic assisted lipoplasty: analysis of local and systemic effects, efficacy, and costs of these methods. Aesthetic Plast Surg 24:395

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Scuderi N, Tenna S, Spalvieri C, De Gado F (2005) Power-assisted lipoplasty versus traditional suction-assisted lipoplasty: comparative evaluation and analysis of output. Aesthetic Plast Surg 29:49

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pasquale Fino.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cigna, E., Tarallo, M., Fino, P. et al. Surgical Correction of Gynecomastia in Thin Patients. Aesth Plast Surg 35, 439–445 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-010-9618-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-010-9618-3

Keywords

Navigation