Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Facet joint violation during pedicle screw insertion: a cadaveric study of the adult lumbosacral spine comparing the two pedicle screw insertion techniques

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article analyses the incidence of facet joint violation by pedicle screws inserted via the two most commonly used techniques, intersection and mammillary. Pedicle screws were inserted on each side of fresh-frozen human cadevaric specimen lumbosacral spines using the two techniques. All facet joints which were violated were found to be on the right side, where the mamillary process technique was employed. The incidence of facet joint violation was higher in the mammillary technique, which was statistically significant. The intersection technique appears to be safer than the mamillary with respect to violation of the adjacent superior facet joint.

Résumé

Cet article analyse l’altération de la facette articulaire par la vis pédiculaire qui est habituellement introduite selon deux techniques, celle de l’intersection ou celle de la pénétration mammillaire. Les vis étaient insérées sur les deux côtés d’un specimen lombo-sacré cadavérique. Toutes les facettes articulaires atteintes étaient du côté de l’introduction mammillaire. La technique de l’intersection apparaît la plus sûre.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Boucher HH (1959) A method of spinal fusion. J Bone Joint Surg 41:248–259

    Google Scholar 

  2. Davne SH, Myers DL (1992) Complication of lumbar spinal fusion with transpedicular instrumentation. Spine 17(suppl):184–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Enker P, Steffee AD; Interbody fusion and instrumentation (1994) Clin Orthop 300:90–101

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Esses SI, Sachs BL, Dreyzin V (1993) Complications associated with the technique of pedicle screw fixation: a selected survey of ABS members. Spine 18:2231–2239

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gaines RW (2000) The use of pedicle screw internal fixation for the operative treatment of spinal disorders. J Bone Joint Surg Am 82-A:1458–1476

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hanley EN Jr (1995) The indications for lumbar spinal fusion with and without instrumentation Spine 20(suppl):143–153

    Google Scholar 

  7. Heim SE (1997) Transpedicular instrumentation in the degenerative spine. Clin Orthop 337:97–110

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Krag MH, Beynnon BD, Pope MH et al (1986) An internal fixator for posterior application to short segments of thoracic, lumbar, or lumbosacral spine: design and testing. Clin Orthop 203:75–98

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Louis R (1986) Fusion of the lmbar and sacral spine by internal fixation with screw plates. Clin Orthop 203:18–33

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Masferrer R, Gomez CH, Karahalios DG, Sonntag VKH (1998) Efficacy of pedicle screw fixation in the treatment of instability and failed back surgery: a 5-year review. J Neurosurg 89:371–377

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Matsuzaki H, Tokuhashi Y, Matsmoto F et al (1990) Problems and solutions of pedicle screw plate fixation of lumbar spine. Spine 15:1159–1165

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Okuyama K, Abe E, Suzuki T, Tamura Y, Chiba M, Sato K (1999) Posterior lumbar interbody fusion. A retrospective study of complications after facet joint excision and pedicle screw fixation in 148 cases. Acta Orthop Scand 70:327–334

    Google Scholar 

  13. Pihlajamaki H, Myllyen P, Bostman O (1997) Complications of transpedicular lumbosacral fixation for non-traumatic disorders. J Bone Joint Surg Br 79-B:183–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ray CD (1997) Threaded titanium cages for the lumbar interbody fusions. Spine 22:667–679; discussion 679–680

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Roy-Camille R, Saillant G, Mazel C (1986) Internal fixation of the lumbar spine with pedicle screw plating. Clin Orthop 203:7–17

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Shah RR, Mohammed S, Saifuddin A, Taylor BA (2003) Radiologic evaluation of adjacent superior segment facet joint violation following transpedicular instrumentation of lumbar spine. Spine 28:272–275

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sjostrom L, Jacobson O, Karlstrom G et al (1993) CT analysis of pedicles and screw tracts after implant removal in thoracolumbar fractures. J Spinal Disord 6:225–231

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Steffe AD, Biscup RS, Sitkowski DJ (1986) Segmental spine plates with pedicle screw dixation: a new internal fixation device for disorders of the lumbar and thoracolumbar spine. Clin Orthop 203:45–53

    Google Scholar 

  19. Weinstein JN, Spratt KF, Rauschning W (1992) Anatomic and technical considerations of pedicle screw fixation. Clin Orthop 284:34–46

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. West JL III, Bradford DS, Ogilvie JW (1991) Complications of the variable screw plate pedicle screw fixation. Spine 16:576–579

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Vaccaro AR, Garfin SR (1995) Internal fixation (pedicle screw fixation) for fusions of the lumbar spine. Spine 20(suppl):157–165

    Google Scholar 

  22. Zucherman J, Hsu K, White A et al (1988) Early results if spinal fusion using variable spine plating system. Spine 13:570–579

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seung Woo Suh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chung, K.J., Suh, S.W., Swapnil, K. et al. Facet joint violation during pedicle screw insertion: a cadaveric study of the adult lumbosacral spine comparing the two pedicle screw insertion techniques. International Orthopaedics (SICO 31, 653–656 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-006-0249-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-006-0249-x

Keywords

Navigation