Skip to main content
Log in

Retroperitoneal low-flow vascular malformations: characteristic MRI findings correlated with histopathological findings

  • Published:
Abdominal Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the MRI findings of retroperitoneal low-flow vascular malformations (RLVMs) correlated with histopathological findings. Methods: Two radiologists reviewed the MRI findings of 4 RLVMs (3 with capillary malformations and 1 with a venous malformation). First, they evaluated the visibility, signal intensities, and signal homogeneity of each lesion on non-fat-suppressed breath-hold T2-weighted single-shot fast spin-echo (non-FS SSFSE) images and fat-suppressed T2-weighted fast spin-echo (FS T2-weighted FSE) images. Second, the kinetic patterns and the internal enhancement patterns were analyzed for each lesion on multi-phasic contrast-enhanced (CE) images. After these image analyses, the MRI findings were correlated with the histopathological findings. Result: Histopathologically, the 4 RLVMs did not exhibit remarkable degeneration and were present in the retroperitoneal fat tissue without clear capsules. On the non-FS SSFSE images, 3 of the 4 RLVMs could not be discriminated from the surrounding retroperitoneal fat tissue (invisible), and the remaining lesion was barely visible with an indistinct margin. On the FS T2-weighted FSE images, however, all the RLVMs were clearly visualized as homogeneous high-signal intensities. On the multi-phasic CE images, all the capillary malformations exhibited fast enhancement, while a venous malformation showed slow enhancement. Furthermore, the RLVMs tended to exhibit a centripetal filling pattern. Conclusion: The RLVMs blended in with the surrounding retroperitoneal fat tissue on non-FS SSFSE images, like phantoms, whereas they were clearly visualized on FS T2-weighted FSE images. On multi-phasic CE images, the RLVMs tended to exhibit a centripetal filling pattern. These imaging features may be useful diagnostic clues for RLVMs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mulliken JB, Glowacki J (1982) Hemangiomas and vascular malformations in infants and children: a classification based on endothelial characteristics. Plast Reconstr Surg 69:412–422

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Jackson IT, Carreño R, Potparic Z, et al. (1993) Hemangiomas, vascular malformations, and lymphovenous malformations: classification and methods of treatment. Plast Reconstr Surg 91:1216–1230

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Enjolras O (1997) Classification and management of the various superficial vascular anomalies: hemangiomas and vascular malformations. J Dermatol 24:701–710

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Flors L, Leiva-Salinas C, Maqed IM, et al. (2011) MR imaging of soft-tissue vascular malformations: diagnosis, classification, and therapy follow-up. Radiographics 31:1321–1340

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Moukaddam H, Pollak J, Haims AH (2009) MRI characteristics and classification of peripheral vascular malformations and tumors. Skeletal Radiol 38:535–547

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lowe LH, Marchant TC, Rivard DC, Scherbel AJ (2012) Vascular malformations: classification and terminology the radiologist needs to know. Semin Roentgenol 47:106–117

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Donnelly LF, Adams DM, Bisset GS 3rd (2000) Vascular malformations and hemangiomas: a practical approach in a multidisciplinary clinic. AJR Am J Roentgenol 174:597–608

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. van Rijswijk CS, van der Linden E, van der Woude HJ, et al. (2002) Value of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging in diagnosing and classifying peripheral vascular malformations. AJR Am J Roentgenol 178:1181–1187

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Goodwin RW, O’Donnell P, Saifuddin A (2007) MRI appearances of common benign soft-tissue tumours. Clin Radiol 62:843–853

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hassanein AH, Mulliken JB, Fishman SJ, Greene AK (2011) Evaluation of terminology for vascular anomalies in current literature. Plast Reconstr Surg 127:347–351

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Vilanova JC, Barceló J, Smirniotopoulos JG, et al. (2004) Hemangioma from head to toe: MR imaging with pathologic correlation. Radiographics 24:367–385

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Meyer JS, Hoffer FA, Barnes PD, Mulloken JB (1991) Biological classification of soft-tissue vascular anomalies: MR correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 157:559–564

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hyodoh H, Hori M, Akiba H, et al. (2005) Peripheral vascular malformations: imaging, treatment approaches, and therapeutic issues. Radiographics 25(Suppl 1):S159–S171

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Morris EA, Comstock CE, Lee CH, et al. (2013) ACR BI-RADS® magnetic resonance imaging. In: ACR BI-RADS® Atlas, breast imaging reporting and data system. Reston: American College of Radiology

  15. Igarashi J, Hanazaki K (1998) Retroperitoneal venous hemangioma. Am J Gastroenterol 93:2292–2293

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rha SE, Byun JY, Jung SE, et al. (2003) Neurogenic tumors in the abdomen: tumor types and imaging characteristics. Radiographics 23:29–43

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Nishino M, Hayakawa K, Minami M, et al. (2003) Primary retroperitoneal neoplasms: CT and MR imaging findings with anatomic and pathologic diagnostic clues. Radiographics 23:45–57

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Blake MA, Kalra MK, Maher MM, et al. (2004) Pheochromocytoma: an imaging chameleon. Radiographics 24:S87–S99

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Elsayes KM, Narra VR, Leyendecker JR, et al. (2005) MRI of adrenal and extraadrenal pheochromocytoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184:860–867

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lane RH, Stephens DH, Reiman HM (1989) Primary retroperitoneal neoplasms: CT findings in 90 cases with clinical and pathologic correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 152:83–89

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Elsayes KM, Staveteig PT, Narra VR, et al. (2007) Retroperitoneal masses: magnetic resonance imaging findings with pathologic correlation. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 36:97–106

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

All authors have no conflict of interest or commercial involvement.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masahiro Jinzaki.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Akita, H., Yamada, Y., Ito, Y. et al. Retroperitoneal low-flow vascular malformations: characteristic MRI findings correlated with histopathological findings. Abdom Imaging 40, 1713–1720 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-014-0319-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-014-0319-2

Keywords

Navigation