Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Pancreatic duct evaluation: accuracy of portal venous phase 64 MDCT

  • Published:
Abdominal Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Many patients presenting with nonspecific signs and symptoms often receive CT scans using general protocols, not optimized to evaluate for pancreatic pathology. Therefore the purpose of this study was to evaluate portal venous phase 64 multi-row detector CT (MDCT) scans for detecting pancreatic duct strictures, stones, pancreas divisum, and communication between pancreatic ducts and cystic pancreatic lesions.

Methods

Institutional review board approval with waived informed consent was obtained for this HIPAA-compliant study. We included all patients that underwent abdominal, portal venous phase, intravenous contrast-enhanced 64 MDCT scans between 6/7/05 and 5/01/07 and MR cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) or endoscopic retrograde pancreatography (ERCP) within 2 months of the CT. This yielded 93 patients (42 males, 51 females) with a mean age of 59 years. In addition to CT, 75 patients underwent MRCP and 37 patients underwent ERCP. Two radiologists independently evaluated the CT images, including multiplanar and minimum intensity pixel projection reformations, for pancreatic duct strictures, stones, pancreas divisum, or cystic pancreatic lesions. The latter were classified as communicating or not communicating with the pancreatic ducts. Findings on ERCP or MRCP were used to calculate diagnostic performance parameters.

Results

On standard of reference examinations, 15 (16%) of the 93 patients had a pancreatic duct stricture. The sensitivity and the specificity for Observer 1 were 87% and 100%, respectively; for Observer 2, 100% and 100%, respectively. Six (6%) of the 93 patients had main pancreatic duct stones. The sensitivity and the specificity for Observer 1 were 83% and 100%, respectively; for Observer 2, 100% and 99%, respectively. Five (5%) patients had pancreas divisum; Observer 1 correctly identified four and Observer 2 correctly identified three cases. Eleven (12%) patients had cystic pancreatic lesions. Observer 1 correctly determined whether or not there was communication between the cystic pancreatic lesion and the pancreatic duct in ten cases; Observer 2 correctly made this determination in nine cases.

Conclusion

Portal venous phase 64 MDCT images are moderately sensitive and highly specific for detecting pancreatic duct stricture, stones, and pancreas divisum and moderately accurate for detecting communication between pancreatic ducts and cystic pancreatic lesions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barish M, Soto J, Ferrucci J (1997) Magnetic resonance pancreatography. Endoscopy 29(6):487–495

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Feldman DR, Kulling DP, Kay CL, et al. (1997) Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: a novel approach to the evaluation of suspected pancreaticobiliary neoplasms. Ann Surg Oncol 4(8):634–638

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Sugiyama M, Atomi Y, Hachiya J (1998) Intraductal papillary tumors of the pancreas: evaluation with magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. Am J Gastroenterol 93(2):156–159

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Fulcher AS, Turner MA, Capps GW, Zfass AM, Baker KM (1998) Half-Fourier RARE MR cholangiopancreatography: experience in 300 subjects. Radiology 207(1):21–32

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ueno E, Takada Y, Yoshida I, Toda J, Sugiura T, Toki F (1998) Pancreatic diseases: evaluation with MR cholangiopancreatography. Pancreas 16(3):418–426

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Broder J, Warshauer DM (2006) Increasing utilization of computed tomography in the adult emergency department, 2000–2005. Emerg Radiol 13(1):25–30

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kawamoto S, Lawler LP, Horton KM, Eng J, Hruban RH, Fishman EK (2006) MDCT of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas: evaluation of features predictive of invasive carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186(3):687–695

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Itoh S, Fukushima H, Takada A, Suzuki K, Satake H, Ishigaki T (2006) Assessment of anomalous pancreaticobiliary ductal junction with high-resolution multiplanar reformatted images in MDCT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 187(3):668–675

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Soto JA, Lucey BC, Stuhlfaut JW (2005) Pancreas divisum: depiction with multi-detector row CT. Radiology 235(2):503–508

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Salles A, Nino-Murcia M, Jeffrey RB Jr (2007) CT of pancreas: minimum intensity projections. Abdom Imaging 2007 Mar 27 [Epub ahead of print]

  11. Edge MD, Hoteit M, Patel AP, Wang X, Baumgarten DA, Cai Q (2007) Clinical significance of main pancreatic duct dilation on computed tomography: single and double duct dilation. World J Gastroenterol 13(11):1701–1705

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Smith SL, Basu A, Rae DM, Sinclair M (2007) Preoperative staging accuracy of multidetector computed tomography in pancreatic head adenocarcinoma. Pancreas 34(2):180–184

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Yamada Y, Mori H, Matsumoto S, Kamei N, Hongo N (2006) Invasive carcinomas derived from intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas: a long-term follow-up assessment with CT imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr 30(6):885–890

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Faria SC, Tamm EP, DuBrow R, et al. (2004) Use of thin-section, multidetector row helical CT images for coronal oblique reformations for optimal visualization of structures in the hepatoduodenal ligament. Abdom Imaging 29(2):231–238. Erratum in: Abdom Imaging 29(4):536 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Itoh S, Ikeda M, Ota T, Satake H, Takai K, Ishigaki T (2003) Assessment of the pancreatic and intrapancreatic bile ducts using 0.5-mm collimation and multiplanar reformatted images in multislice CT. Eur Radiol 13(2):277–285

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Howard TJ, Moore SA, Saxena R, Matthews DE, Schmidt CM, Wiebke EA (2004) Pancreatic duct strictures are a common cause of recurrent pancreatitis after successful management of pancreatic necrosis. Surgery 136(4):909–916

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bronstein YL, Loyer EM, Kaur H, Choi H, David C, DuBrow RA, Broemeling LD, Cleary KR, Charnsangavej C (2004) Detection of small pancreatic tumors with multiphasic helical CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 182(3):619–623

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Luetmer PH, Stephens DH, Ward EM (1989) Chronic pancreatitis: reassessment with current CT. Radiology 171(2):353–357

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. De Backer AI, Mortele KJ, Ros RR, Vanbeckevoort D, Vanschoubroeck I, De Keulenaer B (2002) Chronic pancreatitis: diagnostic role of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. JBR-BTR 85(6):304–310

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sasahira N, Tada M, Isayama H, et al. (2007) Outcomes after clearance of pancreatic stones with or without pancreatic stenting. J Gastroenterol 42(1):63–69

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Dumonceau JM, Costamagna G, Tringali A, et al. (2007) Treatment for painful calcified chronic pancreatitis: extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus endoscopic treatment: a randomised controlled trial. Gut 56(4):545–552

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Li JS, Zhang ZD, Tang Y, Jiang R (2007) Retrospective analysis of 88 patients with pancreatic duct stone. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 6(2):208–212

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Leyendecker JR, Elsayes KM, Gratz BI, Brown JJ (2002) MR cholangiopancreatography: spectrum of pancreatic duct abnormalities. AJR Am J Roentgenol 179(6):1465–1471

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Baron RL, Rohrmann CA Jr, Lee SP, Shuman WP, Teefey SA (1988) CT evaluation of gallstones in vitro: correlation with chemical analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 151(6):1123–1128

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Pitchumoni CS, Viswanathan KV, Gee Varghese PJ, Banks PA (1987) Ultrastructure and elemental composition of human pancreatic calculi. Pancreas 2(2):152–158

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Tohda H, Tsuchiya Y, Kobayashi T, Kishiro H, Yanagisawa T (1994) The crystalline structure of pancreatic calculi. J Electron Microsc (Tokyo) 43(2):57–61

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Chiu SS, Lim JH, Lee WJ, Chang KT, Oh DK, Lee KT, Lee JK, Choi SH (2006) Intraductal papillary mucinous tumour of the pancreas: differentiation of malignancy and benignancy by CT. Clin Radiol 61(9):776–783

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Takada A, Itoh S, Suzuki K, et al. (2005) Branch duct-type intraductal papillary mucinous tumor: diagnostic value of multiplanar reformatted images in multislice CT. Eur Radiol 15(9):1888–1897

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Fukukura Y, Fujiyoshi F, Hamada H, et al. (2003) Intraductal papillary mucinous tumors of the pancreas. Comparison of helical CT and MR imaging. Acta Radiol 44(5):464–471

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Sahani DV, Kadavigere R, Blake M, Fernandez-Del Castillo C, Lauwers GY, Hahn PF (2006) Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of pancreas: multi-detector row CT with 2D curved reformations-correlation with MRCP. Radiology 238(2):560–569

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Carbognin G, Pinali L, Girardi V, Casarin A, Mansueto G, Pozzi Mucelli R (2007) Collateral branches IPMTs: secretin-enhanced MRCP. Abdom Imaging 32(3):374–380

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiology, Boston University Medical Center, 88 East Newton Street, 2nd Floor, Boston, MA, 02215, USA

    Stephan W. Anderson & Jorge A. Soto

Authors
  1. Stephan W. Anderson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jorge A. Soto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephan W. Anderson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Anderson, S.W., Soto, J.A. Pancreatic duct evaluation: accuracy of portal venous phase 64 MDCT. Abdom Imaging 34, 55–63 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-008-9396-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-008-9396-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation