Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Conversion and reliability of two urological grading systems in infants: the Society for Fetal Urology and the urinary tract dilatation classifications system

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The urinary tract dilation (UTD) classification system was proposed in 2014.

Objective

To evaluate the correspondence and reliability of two US grading systems for postnatal urinary tract dilatation in infants: the Society for Fetal Urology (SFU) and the UTD systems.

Materials and methods

We assessed 180 kidneys in infants younger than 1 year. Four radiologists assessed the kidneys twice using both the SFU system (grades 0 to 4) and the UTD system (grades normal, P1, P2, P3). The SFU system was re-categorized into SFU-A (grades 0, 1–2, 3, 4) and into SFU-B (grades 0–1, 2, 3, 4). The Cohen kappa statistic was used for estimating agreement of both UTD–SFU-A and UTD–SFU-B.

Results

The Cohen kappa was significantly higher between UTD and SFU-B as compared to the UTD and SFU-A (0.75 vs. 0.50, P < 0.001). Intra-observer agreement was similar for the two grading systems (SFU 0.64–0.88 vs. UTD 0.48–0.92, P = 0.050–0.885). SFU grades 2 and 3 showed fair to moderate inter-observer agreement and corresponding UTD grades P1 and P2 showed moderate to substantial agreement. The overall inter-observer agreement was significantly higher for the UTD system than for the SFU system during the first assessment (95% confidence interval [CI]: right kidney, −0.069 to −0.062; left kidney, −0.048 to −0.043).

Conclusion

Correspondence between the systems was poor using a recommended re-categorization (SFU-A). An alternative re-categorization (SFU-B) was found to be more appropriate for establishing correspondence between the systems. Both systems were reliable, with good intra- and inter-observer agreement for the assessment of infant kidneys, but the UTD system had better inter-observer agreement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hamilton BE, Martin JA, Ventura SJ (2013) Births: preliminary data for 2012. Natl Vital Stat Rep 62:1–20

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ulman I, Jayanthi VR, Koff SA (2000) The long-term followup of newborns with severe unilateral hydronephrosis initially treated nonoperatively. J Urol 164:1101–1105

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Nepple KG, Arlen AM, Austin JC et al (2011) The prognostic impact of an abnormal initial renal ultrasound on early reflux resolution. Pediatr Urol 7:462–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Coelho GM, Bouzada MCF, Lemos GS et al (2008) Risk factors for urinary tract infection in children with prenatal renal pelvic dilatation. J Urol 179:284–289

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Fernbach S, Maizels M, Conway J (1993) Ultrasound grading of hydronephrosis: introduction to the system used by the Society for Fetal Urology. Pediatr Radiol 23:478–480

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Zanetta VC, Rosman BM, Bromley B et al (2012) Variations in management of mild prenatal hydronephrosis among maternal-fetal medicine obstetricians, and pediatric urologists and radiologists. J Urol 188:1935–1939

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Swenson DW, Darge K, Ziniel SI et al (2015) Characterizing upper urinary tract dilation on ultrasound: a survey of North American pediatric radiologists’ practices. Pediatr Radiol 45:686–694

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Nguyen HT, Benson CB, Bromley B et al (2014) Multidisciplinary consensus on the classification of prenatal and postnatal urinary tract dilation (UTD classification system). J Pediatr Urol 10:982–998

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hodhod A, Capolicchio JP, Jednak R et al (2016) Evaluation of urinary tract dilation classification system for grading postnatal hydronephrosis. J Urol 195:725–730

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Barnhart HX, Williamson JM (2002) Weighted least-squares approach for comparing correlated kappa. Biometrics 58:1012–1019

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fleiss JL (1971) Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. Psychol Bull 76:378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Efron B, Tibshirani RJ (1994) An introduction to the bootstrap. Springer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  13. Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Onen A (2007) An alternative grading system to refine the criteria for severity of hydronephrosis and optimal treatment guidelines in neonates with primary UPJ-type hydronephrosis. J Pediatr Urol 3:200–205

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Keays M, Guerra L, Mihill J et al (2008) Reliability assessment of Society for Fetal Urology ultrasound grading system for hydronephrosis. J Urol 180:1680–1683

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kim SY, Kim MJ, Yoon CS et al (2013) Comparison of the reliability of two hydronephrosis grading systems: the Society for Foetal Urology grading system vs. the Onen grading system. Clin Radiol 68:e484–e490

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sibai H, Salle JP, Houle A et al (2001) Hydronephrosis with diffuse or segmental cortical thinning: impact on renal function. J Urol 165:2293–2295

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Shimada K, Kakizaki H, Kubota M et al (2004) Standard method for diagnosing dilatation of the renal pelvis and ureter discovered in the fetus, neonate or infant. Int J Urol 11:129–132

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Riccabona M, Avni FE, Blickman JG et al (2008) Imaging recommendations in paediatric uroradiology: minutes of the ESPR workgroup session on urinary tract infection, fetal hydronephrosis, urinary tract ultrasonography and voiding cystourethrography, Barcelona, Spain, June 2007. Pediatr Radiol 38:138–145

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Dejter S Jr, Gibbons M (1989) The fate of infant kidneys with fetal hydronephrosis but initially normal postnatal sonography. J Urol 142:661–662

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Perez-Brayfield MR, Kirsch AJ, Jones RA et al (2003) A prospective study comparing ultrasound, nuclear scintigraphy and dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of hydronephrosis. J Urol 170:1330–1334

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Longpre M, Nguan A, MacNeily AE et al (2012) Prediction of the outcome of antenatally diagnosed hydronephrosis: a multivariable analysis. J Pediatr Urol 8:135–139

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Heera Lee, medical illustrator, Medical Information & Media Center, Ajou University Medical Center, Suwon, Korea, for her help with the figures.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Ajou University Medical Center, 164 World cup-ro, Yeongtong-gu, Suwon, Korea, 443-380

    Miran Han, Hyun Gi Kim, Seon Young Park & Young Keun Sur

  2. Office of Biostatistics, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea

    Jung-Dong Lee

Authors
  1. Miran Han
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hyun Gi Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jung-Dong Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Seon Young Park
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Young Keun Sur
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hyun Gi Kim.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

None

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Han, M., Kim, H.G., Lee, JD. et al. Conversion and reliability of two urological grading systems in infants: the Society for Fetal Urology and the urinary tract dilatation classifications system. Pediatr Radiol 47, 65–73 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-016-3721-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-016-3721-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation