Skip to main content
Log in

Sagittal synostosis after excision of congenital pigmented nevus of the scalp: a possible complication of the tissue expansion technique

  • Case Report
  • Published:
European Journal of Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We report a case of sagittal synostosis that was detected because of cranial deformity 5 years after a congenital pigmented nevus of the scalp was resected using the tissue expansion (TE) technique. Currently, no case report describes the association between TE and craniosynostosis. To explain the mechanism of the craniosynostosis in the present case, we considered that the area of placement, number of expanders, injection schedule, age at operation, or a combination of these may have been responsible for early suture fusion. Considering that complete fusion of the sagittal suture was observed on the postoperative computed tomography but that the compensatory change of the cranial shape was relatively minor, we speculated that the changes in the patient’s skull could have been secondary (late-onset) sagittal synostosis caused by the surgery. Because the deformity in secondary craniosynostosis is relatively minor, it may be overlooked by some surgeons. We recommend careful placement of the expander and long-term follow-up, especially in infants.

Level of Evidence: Level V, risk/prognostic study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Radovan C (1983) Tissue expansion in soft-tissue reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 74:482–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Huang X, Qu X, Li Q (2011) Risk factors for complications of tissue expansion: a 20-year systematic review and meta-analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 128:787–797

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Calobrace MB, Downey SE (1997) Calvarial deformity and remodeling following prolonged scalp expansion in a child. Ann Plast Surg 39:186–189

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. El-Saadi MM, Nasr MA (2008) The effect of tissue expansion on skull bones in the paediatric age group from 2 to 7 years. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 61:413–418

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Zaal LH, van der Horst CM (2009) Results of the early use of tissue expansion for giant congenital melanocytic naevi on the scalp and face. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 62:216–220

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Millet-Declerck M, Calibre C, Herbaux B et al (2012) Long-term results in scalp tissue expansion in children. Eur J Pediatr Surg 22:269–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Higginbottom MC, Jones KL, James HE (1980) Intrauterine constraint and craniosynostosis. Neurosurgery 6:39–44

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Graham JM Jr, Badura RJ, Smith DW (1980) Coronal craniostenosis: fetal head constraint as one possible cause. Pediatrics 65:995–999

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Oppenheimer AJ, Rhee ST, Goldstein SA et al (2009) Force-induced craniosynostosis in the murine sagittal suture. Plast Reconstr Surg 124:1840–1848

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chu KF, Sullivan SR, Taylor HO (2013) Pan-suture synostosis after posterior vault distraction. Eplasty 13:52

    Google Scholar 

  11. Colonna M, Cavallini M, de Angelis A et al (1996) The effects of scalp expansion on the cranial bone: a clinical, histological, and instrumental study. Ann Plast Surg 36:255–260

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Keskin M, Kelly CP, Yavuzer R et al (2006) External filling ports in tissue expansion: confirming their safety and convenience. Plast Reconstr Surg 117:1543–51

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Chung C, Forte AJ, Narayan D et al (2006) Giant nevi: a review. J Craniofac Surg 17:1210–5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Zaal LH, Mooi WJ, Sillevis Smitt JH et al (2004) Classification of congenital melanocytic naevi and malignant transformation: a review of the literature. Br J Plast Surg 57:707–19

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Krengel S, Marghoob AA (2012) Current management approaches for congenital melanocytic nevi. Dermatol Clin 30:377–87

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Koizumi T, Komuro Y, Hashizume K et al (2010) Cephalic index of Japanese children with normal brain development. J Craniofac Surg 21:1434–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

Takada Keiko and Tamada Ikkei declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Statement of Ethical Standards

This study was performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments. The formal approval of the ethical committee in our hospital is not required for retrospective observational studies.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tamada Ikkei.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Keiko, T., Ikkei, T. Sagittal synostosis after excision of congenital pigmented nevus of the scalp: a possible complication of the tissue expansion technique. Eur J Plast Surg 38, 491–494 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-015-1099-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-015-1099-9

Keywords

Navigation