Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Multiplane technique for simultaneous submuscular breast augmentation and internal glandulopexy using inframammary crease incision in selected patients with early ptosis

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Journal of Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Augmentation mammoplasty is a procedure with a high satisfaction rate. On the other hand, augmentation in a ptotic breast requires conventional mastopexy which has a high surgical morbidity. In selected cases, the multiplane technique, a simultaneous submuscular augmentation with internal glandulopexy, is a procedure which avoids the external scarring of mastopexy. Between June 2005 and October 2008, the author operated on 44 patients (12 unilateral for nipple level asymmetry not exceeding 1.5 cm and 32 bilateral procedures in patients with nipple-areolar complexes (NAC) below the inframammary crease (IMC) but not exceeding 1.5 cm). The procedure is performed under general anesthesia through an IMC incision. The average age of the patient was 33.5 years (range 19–50), and in all but one patient, a round, high-profile cohesive gel silicone implants with an average size of 354 cm3 (range 260–440) in bilateral and 350 cm3 (range 300–440) in unilateral procedures, were used. The average preoperative suprasternal notch to NAC measurement in unilateral (n = 12) and bilateral (n = 32) procedures was 22.2 cm (range19–24) and 23.2 cm (range 20–26) respectively. The preoperative average NAC distance to IMC distance in bilateral and unilateral cases was 8.03 cm (range 6–12) and 7.2 (range 4–9) cm respectively. The measured postoperative supra-sternal notch to NAC distance, 22.0 cm (range 19.5–23) in unilateral (n = 12) and 22.4 cm (range 20–26) in bilateral procedures (n = 32) respectively, shows the reduction in suprasternal notch to NAC distance. Postoperative NAC to IMC distance in bilateral and unilateral breasts was 9.3 cm (range 7–11) and 9.1 cm (range 7–10) respectively. When a unilateral procedure is performed, the contra lateral breast is used as a control to compare the results. One patient had an infection and of the 12 unilateral and 32 bilateral procedures, nipple sensation was present in 8 unilateral and 28 bilateral cases. Only one patient with bilateral procedure reported a bilateral loss of nipple sensation in the early part of her recovery. Two patients did have residual ptosis and one requested a bilateral vertical scar mastopexy. The multiplane procedure for submuscular augmentation with internal subglandular mastopexy is an option in selected patients with early ptosis or patients presenting with minor NAC asymmetry in the vertical axis. If necessary, conventional external mastopexy remains a possibility in patients with inadequate results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Spear SL, Pelletiere CV, Menon N (2004) One-stage augmentation combined with mastopexy: aesthetic results and patient satisfaction. Aesthet Plast Surg 28:259–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wise RL (1956) Preliminary report on a method of planning the mammoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 17:367

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lejour M (1994) Vertical mammoplasty and liposuction of the breast. Plast Reconstr Surg 94:100–114

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bartels RJ, Strickland DM, Douglas WM (1976) A new mastopexy operation for mild or moderate breast ptosis. Plast Reconstr Surg 57:687

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Binelli L (1990) A new periareolar mammoplasty, “The Round Block” technique. Aesthet Plast Surg 14:93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Khan UD (2007) Muscle splitting biplane breast augmentation. a new pocket in a different plane. Aesthet Plast Surg 31:353–358

    Google Scholar 

  7. Khan UD. Augmentation mastopexy in muscle splitting biplane: an outcome of first 44 consecutive cases of mastopexies in a new pocket. Aesthet Plast Surg. Online First

  8. Regnault P (1976) Breast ptosis. Clin Plast Surg 3:193–203

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Becker H, Storm van Leeuwen JB (1990) The correction of breast ptosis with expander mammary prosthesis. Ann Plast Surg 24:489–497

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Keramidas E, Rodopoulou S, Khan UD (2005) The ballooning manoeuvre in breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 115:1795

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Cronin TD, Gerow RM (1964) Augmentation mammoplasty: new “natural feel” prosthesis. In: Translation of the third International Congress of the Plastic Surgery, Amsterdam, pp 41–49. Excerpta Medica International Congress Series, No. 66

  12. Gonzales-Ulloa M (1960) Correction of hypotrophy of the breast by exogenous material. Plast Reconstr Surg 25:15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Regnault P (1966) The hypoplastic and ptotic breast: a combined operation with prosthetic augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 37:31

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Spear SL, Pelletiere CV, Menon N (2004) One-stage augmentation combined with mastopexy: aesthetic results and patient satisfaction. Aesthet Plast Surg 28:259–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Spear SL, Low M, Ducic I (2003) Revision augmentation mastopexy: indications, operations, and outcomes. Ann Plast Surg 51:540–546

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Spear LS (2003) Augmentation mastopexy: “surgeon, beware”. Plast Reconstr Surg 112:905–906

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Stevens WG, Stoker DA, Freeman ME, Quardt SM, Hircsh EM, Cohen R (2006) Is one-stage breast augmentation with mastopexy safe and effective? A review of 186 primary cases. Aesthet Surg J 26:674–680

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Persoff MM (2003) Vertical mastopexy with expansion augmentation. Aesthet Plast Surg 27:13–19

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Becker H, Hartog J (2006) Augmentation mastopexy using adjustable implants with external injection dome. Aesthet Surg J 26:736–740

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Khan UD (2006) Lower pole enhancement in breast augmentation. 6th Croatian Congress of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Opatja-Rijeka, Croatia

  21. Khan UD (2009) Dynamic breasts: a common complication following partial submuscular augmentation and its correction using muscle splitting biplane technique. Aesthet Plast Surg 33:353–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Khan UD (2009) Selection of breast pocket using pinch test in augmentation mammoplasty: can it be relied in long term? Aesthet Plast Surg 33:780–781

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Umar Daraz Khan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Khan, U.D. Multiplane technique for simultaneous submuscular breast augmentation and internal glandulopexy using inframammary crease incision in selected patients with early ptosis. Eur J Plast Surg 34, 337–343 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-010-0521-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-010-0521-6

Keywords

Navigation