Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparison of clinical outcomes of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer harbouring epidermal growth factor receptor exon 19 or exon 21 mutations after tyrosine kinase inhibitors treatment: a meta-analysis

  • Review Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Exon 19 deletion and exon 21 L858R mutation were the most common epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations. We examined the clinical impact of these two mutations in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment.

Methods

The outcomes of interest were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and objective response rates (ORR), network meta-analysis and direct meta-analysis were conducted to calculate the efficacy of EGFR-TKIs between these two mutations. We also investigated the association between EGFR mutation types and clinical characteristics.

Results

A total of 4835 patients from 26 trials were assessed. EGFR-TKIs, compared with chemotherapy, significantly prolonged PFS and OS in both exon 19 deletion and exon 21 L858R mutation based on 8 trials. Network meta-analysis revealed that treatment with EGFR-TKIs had greater benefit in exon 19 deletion than in exon 21 L858R mutation. Furthermore, direct meta-analysis from 12 studies showed the similar result; patients with exon 19 deletion had a significantly longer PFS compared with exon 21 L858R mutation (HR, 0.69; 95 % CI, 0.57–0.82; P < 0.001). There were also greater benefit on OS (HR, 0.61; 95 % CI, 0.43–0.86; P = 0.005) and higher ORR (OR, 2.14; 95 % CI, 1.63–2.81; P < 0.001). Additionally, we found that a significant association between the type of mutation and age (P < 0.001) or smoking status (P = 0.022), but no other significant differences were detected in sex, histologic subtype and performance status between these two mutations.

Conclusions

Patients with NSCLC and EGFR exon 19 deletion had a longer PFS, OS and higher response rates after EGFR-TKI therapy compared with exon 21 L858R mutation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu J, Ward E (2010) Cancer statistics, 2010. CA Cancer J Clin 60(5):277–300. doi:10.3322/caac.20073

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ramalingam S, Belani C (2008) Systemic chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: recent advances and future directions. Oncologist 13(Suppl 1):5–13. doi:10.1634/theoncologist.13-S1-5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Herbst RS, Heymach JV, Lippman SM (2008) Lung cancer. N Engl J Med 359(13):1367–1380. doi:10.1056/NEJMra0802714

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Dahabreh IJ, Linardou H, Siannis F, Kosmidis P, Bafaloukos D, Murray S (2010) Somatic EGFR mutation and gene copy gain as predictive biomarkers for response to tyrosine kinase inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res Off J Am Assoc Cancer Res 16(1):291–303. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-1660

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Maemondo M, Inoue A, Kobayashi K, Sugawara S, Oizumi S, Isobe H, Gemma A, Harada M, Yoshizawa H, Kinoshita I, Fujita Y, Okinaga S, Hirano H, Yoshimori K, Harada T, Ogura T, Ando M, Miyazawa H, Tanaka T, Saijo Y, Hagiwara K, Morita S, Nukiwa T (2010) Gefitinib or chemotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer with mutated EGFR. N Engl J Med 362(25):2380–2388. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0909530

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Mitsudomi T, Morita S, Yatabe Y, Negoro S, Okamoto I, Tsurutani J, Seto T, Satouchi M, Tada H, Hirashima T, Asami K, Katakami N, Takada M, Yoshioka H, Shibata K, Kudoh S, Shimizu E, Saito H, Toyooka S, Nakagawa K, Fukuoka M (2010) Gefitinib versus cisplatin plus docetaxel in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer harbouring mutations of the epidermal growth factor receptor (WJTOG3405): an open label, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 11(2):121–128. doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(09)70364-x

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Rosell R, Carcereny E, Gervais R, Vergnenegre A, Massuti B, Felip E, Palmero R, Garcia-Gomez R, Pallares C, Sanchez JM, Porta R, Cobo M, Garrido P, Longo F, Moran T, Insa A, De Marinis F, Corre R, Bover I, Illiano A, Dansin E, de Castro J, Milella M, Reguart N, Altavilla G, Jimenez U, Provencio M, Moreno MA, Terrasa J, Munoz-Langa J, Valdivia J, Isla D, Domine M, Molinier O, Mazieres J, Baize N, Garcia-Campelo R, Robinet G, Rodriguez-Abreu D, Lopez-Vivanco G, Gebbia V, Ferrera-Delgado L, Bombaron P, Bernabe R, Bearz A, Artal A, Cortesi E, Rolfo C, Sanchez-Ronco M, Drozdowskyj A, Queralt C, de Aguirre I, Ramirez JL, Sanchez JJ, Molina MA, Taron M, Paz-Ares L (2012) Erlotinib versus standard chemotherapy as first-line treatment for European patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (EURTAC): a multicentre, open-label, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 13(3):239–246. doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(11)70393-x

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhou C, Wu YL, Chen G, Feng J, Liu XQ, Wang C, Zhang S, Wang J, Zhou S, Ren S, Lu S, Zhang L, Hu C, Luo Y, Chen L, Ye M, Huang J, Zhi X, Zhang Y, Xiu Q, Ma J, You C (2011) Erlotinib versus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (OPTIMAL, CTONG-0802): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol 12(8):735–742. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70184-X

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ichihara S, Toyooka S, Fujiwara Y, Hotta K, Shigematsu H, Tokumo M, Soh J, Asano H, Ichimura K, Aoe K, Aoe M, Kiura K, Shimizu K, Date H, Shimizu N (2007) The impact of epidermal growth factor receptor gene status on gefitinib-treated Japanese patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. Int J Cancer 120(6):1239–1247. doi:10.1002/ijc.22513

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Goto K, Nishio M, Yamamoto N, Chikamori K, Hida T, Maemondo M, Katakami N, Kozuki T, Yoshioka H, Seto T, Fukuyama T, Tamura T (2013) A prospective, phase II, open-label study (JO22903) of first-line erlotinib in Japanese patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Lung Cancer 82(1):109–114. doi:10.1016/j.lungcan.2013.07.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Jackman DM, Yeap BY, Sequist LV, Lindeman N, Holmes AJ, Joshi VA, Bell DW, Huberman MS, Halmos B, Rabin MS, Haber DA, Lynch TJ, Meyerson M, Johnson BE, Janne PA (2006) Exon 19 deletion mutations of epidermal growth factor receptor are associated with prolonged survival in non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with gefitinib or erlotinib. Clin Cancer Res Off J Am Assoc Cancer Res 12(13):3908–3914. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-0462

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Riely GJ, Pao W, Pham D, Li AR, Rizvi N, Venkatraman ES, Zakowski MF, Kris MG, Ladanyi M, Miller VA (2006) Clinical course of patients with non-small cell lung cancer and epidermal growth factor receptor exon 19 and exon 21 mutations treated with gefitinib or erlotinib. Clin Cancer Res Off J Am Assoc Cancer Res 12(3 Pt 1):839–844. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-1846

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Sequist LV, Yang JC, Yamamoto N, O’Byrne K, Hirsh V, Mok T, Geater SL, Orlov S, Tsai CM, Boyer M, Su WC, Bennouna J, Kato T, Gorbunova V, Lee KH, Shah R, Massey D, Zazulina V, Shahidi M, Schuler M (2013) Phase III study of afatinib or cisplatin plus pemetrexed in patients with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma with EGFR mutations. J Clin Oncol 31(27):3327–3334. doi:10.1200/jco.2012.44.2806

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Wu YL, Zhou C, Hu CP, Feng J, Lu S, Huang Y, Li W, Hou M, Shi JH, Lee KY, Xu CR, Massey D, Kim M, Shi Y, Geater SL (2014) Afatinib versus cisplatin plus gemcitabine for first-line treatment of Asian patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer harbouring EGFR mutations (LUX-Lung 6): an open-label, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 15(2):213–222. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70604-1

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Yang JC, Wu YL, Schuler M, Sebastian M, Popat S, Yamamoto N, Zhou C, Hu CP, O’Byrne K, Feng J, Lu S, Huang Y, Geater SL, Lee KY, Tsai CM, Gorbunova V, Hirsh V, Bennouna J, Orlov S, Mok T, Boyer M, Su WC, Lee KH, Kato T, Massey D, Shahidi M, Zazulina V, Sequist LV (2015) Afatinib versus cisplatin-based chemotherapy for EGFR mutation-positive lung adenocarcinoma (LUX-Lung 3 and LUX-Lung 6): analysis of overall survival data from two randomised, phase 3 trials. Lancet Oncol 16(2):141–151. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(14)71173-8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang Y, Sheng J, Kang S, Fang W, Yan Y, Hu Z, Hong S, Wu X, Qin T, Liang W, Zhang L (2014) Patients with exon 19 deletion were associated with longer progression-free survival compared to those with L858R mutation after first-line EGFR-TKIs for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis. PLoS One 9(9), e107161. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0107161

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. McCormick F, Cvetanovich GL, Kim JM, Harris JD, Gupta AK, Abrams GD, Romeo AA, Provencher MT (2013) An assessment of the quality of rotator cuff randomized controlled trials: utilizing the Jadad score and CONSORT criteria. J Shoulder Elb Surg Am Shoulder Elb Surg 22(9):1180–1185. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2013.01.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Caldwell DM, Ades AE, Higgins JP (2005) Simultaneous comparison of multiple treatments: combining direct and indirect evidence. BMJ 331(7521):897–900. doi:10.1136/bmj.331.7521.897

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Bucher HC, Guyatt GH, Griffith LE, Walter SD (1997) The results of direct and indirect treatment comparisons in meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Clin Epidemiol 50(6):683–691

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Woods BS, Hawkins N, Scott DA (2010) Network meta-analysis on the log-hazard scale, combining count and hazard ratio statistics accounting for multi-arm trials: a tutorial. BMC Med Res Methodol 10:54. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-10-54

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Jansen JP, Crawford B, Bergman G, Stam W (2008) Bayesian meta-analysis of multiple treatment comparisons: an introduction to mixed treatment comparisons. Value Health J Int Soc Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 11(5):956–964. doi:10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00347.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gotzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, Clarke M, Devereaux PJ, Kleijnen J, Moher D (2009) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ 339:b2700. doi:10.1136/bmj.b2700

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Asahina H, Yamazaki K, Kinoshita I, Sukoh N, Harada M, Yokouchi H, Ishida T, Ogura S, Kojima T, Okamoto Y, Fujita Y, Dosaka-Akita H, Isobe H, Nishimura M (2006) A phase II trial of gefitinib as first-line therapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer with epidermal growth factor receptor mutations. Br J Cancer 95(8):998–1004. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6603393

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Choi CM, Kim MY, Lee JC, Kim HJ (2014) Advanced lung adenocarcinoma harboring a mutation of the epidermal growth factor receptor: CT findings after tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy. Radiology 270(2):574–582. doi:10.1148/radiol.13121824

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Fukuoka M, Wu YL, Thongprasert S, Sunpaweravong P, Leong SS, Sriuranpong V, Chao TY, Nakagawa K, Chu DT, Saijo N, Duffield EL, Rukazenkov Y, Speake G, Jiang H, Armour AA, To KF, Yang JC, Mok TS (2011) Biomarker analyses and final overall survival results from a phase III, randomized, open-label, first-line study of gefitinib versus carboplatin/paclitaxel in clinically selected patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer in Asia (IPASS). J Clin Oncol 29(21):2866–2874. doi:10.1200/jco.2010.33.4235

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Han SW, Kim TY, Hwang PG, Jeong S, Kim J, Choi IS, Oh DY, Kim JH, Kim DW, Chung DH, Im SA, Kim YT, Lee JS, Heo DS, Bang YJ, Kim NK (2005) Predictive and prognostic impact of epidermal growth factor receptor mutation in non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with gefitinib. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol 23(11):2493–2501. doi:10.1200/JCO.2005.01.388

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Inoue A, Suzuki T, Fukuhara T, Maemondo M, Kimura Y, Morikawa N, Watanabe H, Saijo Y, Nukiwa T (2006) Prospective phase II study of gefitinib for chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer with epidermal growth factor receptor gene mutations. J Clin Oncol 24(21):3340–3346. doi:10.1200/jco.2005.05.4692

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Kim DW, Lee SH, Lee JS, Lee MA, Kang JH, Kim SY, Shin SW, Kim HK, Heo DS (2011) A multicenter phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of gefitinib as first-line treatment for Korean patients with advanced pulmonary adenocarcinoma harboring EGFR mutations. Lung Cancer 71(1):65–69. doi:10.1016/j.lungcan.2010.04.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Lee VH, Tin VP, Choy TS, Lam KO, Choi CW, Chung LP, Tsang JW, Ho PP, Leung DK, Ma ES, Liu J, Shek TW, Kwong DL, Leung TW, Wong MP (2013) Association of exon 19 and 21 EGFR mutation patterns with treatment outcome after first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitor in metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol Off Publ Int Assoc Study Lung Cancer 8(9):1148–1155. doi:10.1097/JTO.0b013e31829f684a

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Lu RL, Hu CP, Yang HP, Li YY, Gu QH, Wu L (2014) Biological characteristics and epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors efficacy of EGFR mutation and its subtypes in lung adenocarcinoma. Pathol Oncol Res POR 20(2):445–451. doi:10.1007/s12253-013-9715-0

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Rosell R, Moran T, Queralt C, Porta R, Cardenal F, Camps C, Majem M, Lopez-Vivanco G, Isla D, Provencio M, Insa A, Massuti B, Gonzalez-Larriba JL, Paz-Ares L, Bover I, Garcia-Campelo R, Moreno MA, Catot S, Rolfo C, Reguart N, Palmero R, Sanchez JM, Bastus R, Mayo C, Bertran-Alamillo J, Molina MA, Sanchez JJ, Taron M (2009) Screening for epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in lung cancer. N Engl J Med 361(10):958–967. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0904554

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Satouchi M, Negoro S, Funada Y, Urata Y, Shimada T, Yoshimura S, Kotani Y, Sakuma T, Watanabe H, Adachi S, Takada Y, Yatabe Y, Mitsudomi T (2007) Predictive factors associated with prolonged survival in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with gefitinib. Br J Cancer 96(8):1191–1196. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6603710

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Sequist LV, Martins RG, Spigel D, Grunberg SM, Spira A, Janne PA, Joshi VA, McCollum D, Evans TL, Muzikansky A, Kuhlmann GL, Han M, Goldberg JS, Settleman J, Iafrate AJ, Engelman JA, Haber DA, Johnson BE, Lynch TJ (2008) First-line gefitinib in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer harboring somatic EGFR mutations. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol 26(15):2442–2449. doi:10.1200/JCO.2007.14.8494

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Sugio K, Uramoto H, Onitsuka T, Mizukami M, Ichiki Y, Sugaya M, Yasuda M, Takenoyama M, Oyama T, Hanagiri T, Yasumoto K (2009) Prospective phase II study of gefitinib in non-small cell lung cancer with epidermal growth factor receptor gene mutations. Lung Cancer 64(3):314–318. doi:10.1016/j.lungcan.2008.09.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Sun JM, Won YW, Kim ST, Kim JH, Choi YL, Lee J, Park YH, Ahn JS, Park K, Ahn MJ (2011) The different efficacy of gefitinib or erlotinib according to epidermal growth factor receptor exon 19 and exon 21 mutations in Korean non-small cell lung cancer patients. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 137(4):687–694. doi:10.1007/s00432-010-0928-2

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Won YW, Han JY, Lee GK, Park SY, Lim KY, Yoon KA, Yun T, Kim HT, Lee JS (2011) Comparison of clinical outcome of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer harbouring epidermal growth factor receptor exon 19 or exon 21 mutations. J Clin Pathol 64(11):947–952. doi:10.1136/jclinpath-2011-200169

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Wu YL, Zhou C, Liam CK, Wu G, Liu X, Zhong Z, Lu S, Cheng Y, Han B, Chen L, Huang C, Qin S, Zhu Y, Pan H, Liang H, Li E, Jiang G, How SH, Fernando MC, Zhang Y, Xia F, Zuo Y (2015) First-line erlotinib versus gemcitabine/cisplatin in patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: analyses from the phase III, randomized, open-label, ENSURE study†. Ann Oncol Off J Eur Soc Med Oncol ESMO. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdv270

    Google Scholar 

  38. Yang CH, Yu CJ, Shih JY, Chang YC, Hu FC, Tsai MC, Chen KY, Lin ZZ, Huang CJ, Shun CT, Huang CL, Bean J, Cheng AL, Pao W, Yang PC (2008) Specific EGFR mutations predict treatment outcome of stage IIIB/IV patients with chemotherapy-naive non-small-cell lung cancer receiving first-line gefitinib monotherapy. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol 26(16):2745–2753. doi:10.1200/JCO.2007.15.6695

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Yoshida K, Yatabe Y, Park JY, Shimizu J, Horio Y, Matsuo K, Kosaka T, Mitsudomi T, Hida T (2007) Prospective validation for prediction of gefitinib sensitivity by epidermal growth factor receptor gene mutation in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol Off Publ Int Assoc Study Lung Cancer 2(1):22–28

    Google Scholar 

  40. Lee CK, Davies L, Wu YL, Mitsudomi T, Inoue A, Rosell R, Zhou C, Nakagawa K, Throngprasert S, Fukuoka M, Gralla RJ, Gebski V, Mok T, Yang JC (2015) The impact on overall survival (OS) of first-line gefitinib (G) and erlotinib (E) and of clinical factors in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with activating epidermal growth factor receptor mutations (EGFR mut) based on meta-analysis of 1,231 patients (pts) enrolled in 6 major randomized trials. J Clin Oncol 33, (suppl; abstr 8072)

  41. Moriguchi H, Kim TY, Sato C (2006) Gefitinib for refractory advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Lancet 367(9507):299–300. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68063-X

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Sugio K, Uramoto H, Ono K, Oyama T, Hanagiri T, Sugaya M, Ichiki Y, So T, Nakata S, Morita M, Yasumoto K (2006) Mutations within the tyrosine kinase domain of EGFR gene specifically occur in lung adenocarcinoma patients with a low exposure of tobacco smoking. Br J Cancer 94(6):896–903. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6603040

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Sasaki H, Endo K, Takada M, Kawahara M, Kitahara N, Tanaka H, Okumura M, Matsumura A, Iuchi K, Kawaguchi T, Yukiue H, Kobayashi Y, Yano M, Fujii Y (2006) L858R EGFR mutation status correlated with clinico-pathological features of Japanese lung cancer. Lung Cancer 54(1):103–108. doi:10.1016/j.lungcan.2006.06.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Lee CK, Wu YL, Ding PN, Lord SJ, Inoue A, Zhou C, Mitsudomi T, Rosell R, Pavlakis N, Links M, Gebski V, Gralla RJ, Yang JC (2015) Impact of specific epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations and clinical characteristics on outcomes after treatment with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors versus chemotherapy in EGFR-mutant lung cancer: a meta-analysis. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol 33(17):1958–1965. doi:10.1200/JCO.2014.58.1736

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Zhu JQ, Zhong WZ, Zhang GC, Li R, Zhang XC, Guo AL, Zhang YF, An SJ, Mok TS, Wu YL (2008) Better survival with EGFR exon 19 than exon 21 mutations in gefitinib-treated non-small cell lung cancer patients is due to differential inhibition of downstream signals. Cancer Lett 265(2):307–317. doi:10.1016/j.canlet.2008.02.064

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Hosaka T, Inoue F, Ando K, Ishida H, Kusumoto S, Sugiyama T, Shirai T, Okuda K, Hirose T, Ohnishi T, Horichi N, Saijo N, Adachi M, Nakadate T, Kuroki T, Ohmori T (2007) Mutant epidermal growth factor receptor undergoes less protein degradation due to diminished binding to c-Cbl. Anticancer Res 27(4B):2253–2263

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Kobayashi S, Boggon TJ, Dayaram T, Janne PA, Kocher O, Meyerson M, Johnson BE, Eck MJ, Tenen DG, Halmos B (2005) EGFR mutation and resistance of non-small-cell lung cancer to gefitinib. N Engl J Med 352(8):786–792. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa044238

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Pao W, Miller VA, Politi KA, Riely GJ, Somwar R, Zakowski MF, Kris MG, Varmus H (2005) Acquired resistance of lung adenocarcinomas to gefitinib or erlotinib is associated with a second mutation in the EGFR kinase domain. PLoS Med 2(3), e73. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0020073

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number 81560451), Kunming University of Science and Technology Talent Introduction Fund (grant number KKSY201560001) and National Laboratory Special Fund (grant number 2060204).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Miaomiao Sheng or Wenru Tang.

Ethics declarations

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(PDF 312 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sheng, M., Wang, F., Zhao, Y. et al. Comparison of clinical outcomes of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer harbouring epidermal growth factor receptor exon 19 or exon 21 mutations after tyrosine kinase inhibitors treatment: a meta-analysis. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 72, 1–11 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-015-1966-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-015-1966-0

Keyword

Navigation