Skip to main content
Log in

Competitive interactions between two fucoid algae with different growth forms, Fucus serratus and Himanthalia elongata

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Marine Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Competitive interactions between two fucoid algae with different growth forms, Fucus serratus L. and Himanthalia elongata (L.) S.F. Gray were examined both in the laboratory and on a shore of the Isle of Man, Irish Sea. The growth of germlings of both species declined with increasing density, irrespective of whether they were with cohorts or rival species, indicating that intra- and interspecific competition occurred between germlings. H. elongata suppressed the performance of F. serratus at the germling stage by virtue of its larger initial size, and at the ‘mushroom’ stage by forming a miniature canopy with the ‘caps’ of the adjacent plants. In a field experiment, the mortality of H. elongata juveniles generally increased in mixtures with F. serratus and was highest when F. serratus were 50% of the plants. At the juvenile stage, the negative effect of F. serratus on H. elongata was more severe than the other way round. This was because F. serratus grows predominantly upwards, whereas H. elongata had already begun to expand laterally at the distal end. If F. serratus survives in sparse mixed stands with H. elongata juveniles, it can overgrow them and inhibit their subsequent survivorship and growth, probably by both shading and physical sweeping. H. elongata and F. serratus maintain their discrete monospecific stands because of the varying outcomes of mutual competitive exclusion resulting from their differing growth patterns. Thus it is possible for them to co-occur at a similar shore height.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amsler CD, Reed DC, Neushul M (1992) The microclimate inhabited by macroalgal propagules. Br Phycol J 27:253–270

    Google Scholar 

  • Ang PO, DeWreede RE (1992) Density-dependence in a population of Fucus distichus. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 90:169–181

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrontes J (1993) The nature of the distributional boundary of Fucus serratus on the north shore of Spain. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 93:183–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Begon M, Harper JL, Townsend CR (1986) Ecology: individuals, population and communities, 1st edn. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford

  • Brawley SH (1992) Fertilization in natural populations of the dioecious brown alga Fucus ceranoides and the importance of the polyspermy block. Mar Biol 113:145–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenchley JL, Raven JA, Johnston AM (1996) A comparison of reproductive allocation and reproductive effort between semelparous and iteroparous fucoids (Fucales, Phaeophyta). Hydrobiologia 326/327:185–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenchley JL, Raven JA, Johnston AM (1997) Resource acquisition in two intertidal fucoid seaweeds, Fucus serratus and Himanthalia elongata: seasonal variation and effects of reproductive development. Mar Biol 129:367–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brenchley JL, Raven JA, Johnston AM (1998) Carbon and nitrogen allocation patterns in two intertidal fucoids: Fucus serratus and Himanthalia elongata (Phaeophyta). Eur J Phycol 33:307–313

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter RC (1990) Competition among marine macroalgae: a physiological perspective. J Phycol 26:6–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman ARO (1995) Functional ecology of fucoid algae: twenty-three years of progress. Phycologia 34:1–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Cousens R (1991) Aspects of the design and interpretation of competition (interference) experiments. Weed Technol 5:664–673

    Google Scholar 

  • Cousens R (1996) Design and interpretation of interference studies: are some methods totally unacceptable? NZ J For Sci 26:5–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Creed JC (1995) Spatial dynamics of Himanthalia elongata (Fucales, Phaeophyta) population. J Phycol 31:851–859

    Google Scholar 

  • Creed JC, Norton TA, Harding SP (1996a) The development of size structure in a young Fucus serratus population. Eur J Phycol 31:203–209

    Google Scholar 

  • Creed JC, Norton TA, Kain JM (1996b) Are neighbours harmful or helpful in Fucus vesiculosus populations? Mar Ecol Prog Ser 133:191–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Creed JC, Norton TA, Kain JM (1997) Intraspecific competition in Fucus serratus germlings: the interaction of light, nutrients and density. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 212:211–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibb DC (1937) Observations on Himanthalia lorea (L.) Lyngb. Linn Soc J Bot 51:11–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg DE, Barton DE (1992) Patterns and consequences of interspecific competition in natural communities: a review of field experiments with plants. Am Nat 139:771–801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hay ME (1986) Functional geometry of seaweeds: ecological consequences of thallus layering and shape in contrasting light environments. In: Givnish TJ (ed) On the economy of plant form and function. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 635–636

  • Khan MA, Putwain PD, Bradshaw AD (1975) Population interrelationships. 2. Frequency-dependent fitness in Linum. Heredity 34:145–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitching JA (1987) The flora and fauna associated with Himanthalia elongata (L.) S.F. Gray in relation to water current and wave action in the Lough Hyne Marine Nature Reserve. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 25:663–676

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight M, Parke M (1950) A biological study of Fucus vesiculosus L. and F. serratus L. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 29:439–514

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis JR (1964) The ecology of rocky shores. English Universities Press, London

  • Lüning K (1990) Seaweeds: their environment, biogeography, and ecophysiology. Wiley, New York

  • McLachlan J (1974) Effects of temperature and light on growth and development of embryos of Fucus edentatus and F. distichus spp. distichus. Can J Bot 52:943–951

    Google Scholar 

  • Moss B (1969) Apical meristems and growth control in Himanthalia elongata (S.F. Gray). New Phytol 68:387–397

    Google Scholar 

  • Moss B, Mercer S, Sheader A (1973) Factors affecting the distribution of Himanthalia elongata (L.) S.F. Gray on the north-east coast of England. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 1:233–243

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton TA (1986) The ecology of macroalgae in the Firth of Clyde. Proc R Soc Edinb 90:255–269

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton TA (1991) Conflicting constraints on the form of intertidal algae. Br Phycol J 26:203–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson AM, Lubchenco J (1990) Competition in seaweeds: linking plant traits to competitive outcomes. J Phycol 26:1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson GA, Brawley SH (1996) Reproductive ecology of Fucus distichus (Phaeophyceae): an intertidal alga with successful external fertilization. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 143:211–223

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson GA, Serrão EA, Brawley SH (1998) Control of gamete release in fucoid algae: sensing hydrodynamic conditions via carbon acquisition. Ecology 79:1725–1739

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramon E (1973) Germination and attachment of zygotes of Himanthalia elongata (L.) S.F. Gray. J Phycol 9:445–449

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell G (1990) Age and stage in seaweed population: a cautionary tale. Br Phycol J 25:245–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Silvertown J, Lovett Doust J (1993) Introduction to plant population biology. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford

  • Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1981) Biometry, 2nd edn. Freeman, New York

  • Stengel DB, Wilkes RJ, Guiry MD (1999) Seasonal growth and recruitment of Himanthalia elongata (Fucales, Phaeophyta) in different habitats on the Irish west coast. Eur J Phycol 34:213–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Underwood AJ (1986) The analysis of competition by field experiments. In: Kikkawa J, Anderson DJ (eds) Community ecology: pattern and process. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 240–268

  • Underwood AJ (1997) Experiments in ecology: their logical design and interpretation using analysis of variance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Vadas RL, Johnson S, Norton TA (1992) Recruitment and mortality of early post-settlement stages of benthic algae. Br Phycol J 27:331–351

    Google Scholar 

  • Worm B, Chapman ARO (1998) Relative effects of elevated grazing pressure and competition from a red algal turf on two post-settlement stages of Fucus evanescens C. Ag. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 220:247–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zar JH (1984) Biostatistical analysis, 2nd edn. Prentice-Hall, London

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank anonymous reviewers for very useful comments on the paper. This paper was partially supported by a grant from Wonkwang University in 2004.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Han Gil Choi.

Additional information

Communicated by O. Kinne, Oldendorf/Luhe

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Choi, H.G., Norton, T.A. Competitive interactions between two fucoid algae with different growth forms, Fucus serratus and Himanthalia elongata. Marine Biology 146, 283–291 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-004-1441-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-004-1441-4

Keywords

Navigation