Skip to main content
Log in

Factors associated with adherence and persistence to bisphosphonate therapy in osteoporosis: a cross-sectional survey

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Osteoporosis International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To determine the factors associated with adherence and persistence to bisphosphonate therapy in osteoporosis.

Design

Cross-sectional survey.

Setting

National survey in the UK.

Participants

Participants were recruited through the National Osteoporosis Society and advertisements in the press and on the radio and included 533 women over age 50 with osteoporosis who were currently taking or had taken bisphosphonate therapy within the previous 12 months.

Main outcome measures

Self-reported factors influencing adherence and persistence to bisphosphonate therapy in osteoporosis: fracture history, pain, practical difficulties taking medication (frequency of dosing, dealing with comedications, impact on daily routine), perceptions of therapy, and concerns about bisphosphonate therapy.

Results

Adherence to bisphosphonate therapy was 48% and was associated with previous fracture [odds ratio (OR) 1.62, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.14–3.02], concerns about medication (OR 1.49, 95% CI 1.01–2.20), and less dissatisfaction with medication (OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.44–0.97). Nonpersistence was associated with dissatisfaction with medication (hazard ratio (HR) 1.83, 95% CI 1.38–2.43), side effects (HR 3.69, 95% CI 2.74–4.97), and concerns about bisphosphonate therapy (HR 2.21, 95% CI 1.48–3.30). For both daily (HR 1.53, 95% CI 1.1–2.33) and weekly bisphosphonates (HR 1.90, 95% CI 1.17–3.07), practical difficulties taking bisphosphonate medication—in particular, too frequent dosing—were associated with nonpersistence.

Conclusions

Self-reported nonadherence to daily and weekly bisphosphonates is independent of the decision to stop taking treatment (nonpersistence). Nonpersistence is associated with side effects and other factors that could be modified in clinical practice through education, information, and concordant partnerships.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Caro JJ, Ishak KJ, Huybrechts KF, Raggio G, Naujoks C (2004) The impact of compliance with osteoporosis therapy on fracture rates in actual practice. Osteoporosis Int 15:1003–1008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Tosteson AN, Grove MR, Hammond CS et al (2003) Early discontinuation of treatment for osteoporosis. Am J Med 115:209–216

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Miller NH (1997) Compliance with treatment regimens in chronic asymptomatic diseases. Am J Med 102:43–49

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Simon JA, Lewiecki EM, Smith ME et al (2002) Patient preference for once-weekly aledronate 70 mg versus once daily aledronate 10 mg: a multicenter, randomised, open label, cross-over study. Clin Ther 24:1871–1886

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Donovan JL, Blake DR (1992) Patient noncompliance: deviance or reasoned decision-making? Soc Sci Med 34:507–513

    Google Scholar 

  6. Donovan JL, Blake DR, Fleming WG (1989) The patient is not a blank sheet: lay beliefs and their relevance to patient education. Br J Rheumatol 28:58–61

    Google Scholar 

  7. Horne R (1999) Patients’ beliefs about treatment: the hidden determinant of treatment outcome? J Psychosom Res 47:491–495

    Google Scholar 

  8. Carr AJ, Hughes RA, Vincent K, Carr M, Thwaites C (2004) The impact and implications of new treatments in arthritis: validation of a questionnaire to measure the ‘real life’ effectiveness of medication. Rheumatology 43(suppl):ii83

    Google Scholar 

  9. O’Neill TW, Cooper C, Cannata JB, Diaz Lopez, Hoszowski K et al (1994) Reproducibility of a questionnaire on risk factors for osteoporosis in a multicentre prevalence survey: The European Vertebral Osteoporosis Study. Int J Epidemiology 23(3):559–565

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Fletcher RH (1989) Patient compliance with therapeutic advice: a modern view. The Mount Sinai Journal of Medicine 56:453–458

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kaplan RM, Simon HJ (1990) Compliance in medical care: reconsideration of self-predictions. Annals of Behavioural Medicine 12:66–71

    Google Scholar 

  12. Turbí C, Herrero-Beaumont G, Acebes JC, Torrijos A, Graña J, Miguélez R, Sacristán JA, Marín F (2004) Compliance and satisfaction with raloxifene versus alendronate for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis in clinical practice: an open-label, prospective, nonrandomized, observational study. Clin Ther 26:245–256

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cramer J, Amonkar M, Hebborn A, Suppapanya N (2004) Does dosing regimen impact persistence with bisphosphonate therapy among postmenopausal osteoporotic women? J Bone Miner Res 19(Suppl 1):S448 (Abstract M434)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Unson CG, Siccion E, Gaztambide J, Gaztambide S, Mahoney Trella P, Prestwood K (2003) Nonadherence and osteoporosis treatment preferences of older women: a qualitative study. J Women’s Health 12:1037–1045

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kendler D, Kung AWC, El-Hajj Fuleihan G, González JGG, Gaines KA, Verbruggen N, Melton ME (2004) Patients with osteoporosis prefer once weekly to once daily dosing with alendronate. Maturitas 48; 243–251

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Simon JA, Lewiecki EM, Smith ME, Petruschke RA, Wang L, Palmisano JJ (2002) Patient preference for once-weekly alendronate 70 mg versus once-daily alendronate 10 mg: a multicenter, randomized, open-label, crossover study. Clin Ther 24:1871–1886

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Boccuzzi SJ, Folz SH, Omar MA, Kahler KH (2005) Assessment of adherence and persistence with daily and weekly dosing regimens of oral bisphosphonates. Osteoporosis Int 16(Suppl 4):S35–S36 (Abstract P7.10)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ettinger MP, Gallagher R, Amonkar M, Smith JC, MacCosbe PE (2004) Medication persistence is improved with less frequent dosing of bisphosphonates, but remains inadequate. Arthritis Rheum 15(Suppl.):S513 (Abstract 1325)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was funded by Roche Products and GlaxoSmithKline. The funders had no role in the day-to-day running of the study, the data analysis or interpretation, the drafting of the paper, or the decision to publish. The study was run by an independent clinical research company, Clinimatrix, in association with C.C. and P.W.T. Data were collected and analysed by Clinimatrix and reviewed and interpreted by C.C. and P.W.T. The authors were responsible for determining the content of the paper, writing the paper, and deciding when and where to publish. The funders had no role in these processes.

Declaration of competing interests

P.T. and C.C. have received consulting fees from Roche Products, Merck Sharp & Dohme, and Procter & Gamble, all manufacturers of competing bisphosphonates. A.C. has shares in Clinimatrix, the independent clinical research company that obtained funding for this study from Roche Products and GlaxoSmithKline.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. J. Carr.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carr, A.J., Thompson, P.W. & Cooper, C. Factors associated with adherence and persistence to bisphosphonate therapy in osteoporosis: a cross-sectional survey. Osteoporos Int 17, 1638–1644 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-006-0166-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-006-0166-2

Keywords

Navigation