Skip to main content
Log in

Investigation into the effective injector area of a rotating detonation engine with impact of backflow

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Shock Waves Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For rotating detonation engines, the high-pressure region behind the detonation causes backflow into the plenum, making it difficult to properly design injectors to achieve the target pressure balance due to blockage of a part of the injector area during engine operation. In this paper, we present the pressure and thrust measurement of a rotating detonation engine with two different triplet injectors (fuel injector diameters of 0.8 mm and 1.0 mm) using gaseous methane, gaseous ethylene, and gaseous oxygen. The detonation wave propagation velocity with the fuel injector diameter of 0.8 mm was approximately 200 m/s higher than that with the fuel injector diameter of 1.0 mm. Combustor pressures and specific impulses were almost identical for both fuel injector diameters in this study. For our evaluation of the extent to which the available injector area can be utilized during engine operation, the effective injector area ratio was defined as the ratio of the plenum pressure during burn time to the pre-ignition value. Regardless of fuel species and fuel injector orifice diameter, the effective injector area ratio decreased proportionally with the ratio of combustor pressure to pre-ignition plenum pressure. This result implies that the pressure balance between the upstream plenum pressure and the combustor pressure can be roughly determined taking the effect of backflow into consideration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

A :

Cross-sectional area

A ch :

Detonation channel area

A e :

Outer nozzle exit area

A inj :

Total injector area

A inj,ef :

Effective injector area

A p :

Inner plug nozzle exit area

A th :

Geometric throat area

C d :

Mass flow coefficient

C F,i :

Thrust coefficient

\(c^*_{\rm i}\) :

Characteristic exhaust velocity

d f :

Fuel injector diameter

d ox :

Oxidizer injector diameter

D e :

Outer nozzle exit diameter

D in :

Inner diameter

D p :

Inner plug nozzle diameter

F :

Thrust

h ef :

Effective injection height

h ex :

Excess injection height

h nul :

Null injection height

I sp :

Specific impulse

I sp,i :

Ideal specific impulse

M :

Mach number

\(\dot{m}\) :

Actual mass flow rate

\(\dot{m}\) i :

Ideal mass flow rate

N D :

The number of detonation waves

p :

Pressure

p b :

Back pressure

p c :

RDE combustor pressure

p e,i :

Pressure at nozzle exit

R :

Gas constant

R c :

Center radius of combustor channel

T ple :

Plenum temperature

t :

Time coordinate

t b :

Burn time

t ope :

Valve-open duration for operation

v D :

Detonation wave velocity

γ :

Specific heat ratio

γ g :

Specific heat ratio of combustion product

Δ :

Detonation channel width

Δm :

Mass decrease

ε c :

Nozzle throat contraction ratio

ε e :

Nozzle expansion ratio

Φ :

Equivalence ratio

f:

Fuel

ini:

Initial pre-ignition state

ox:

Oxidizer

ple:

Plenum

th:

Throat

References

  1. Kailasanath, K.: Review of propulsive applications of detonation waves. AIAA J. 38(9), 1698–1708 (2000). https://doi.org/10.2514/2.1156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Fotia, M.L., Schauer, F., Kaemming, T., Hoke, J.: Experimental study of the performance of a rotating detonation engine with nozzle. J. Propuls. Power 32(3), 674–681 (2016). https://doi.org/10.2514/1.B35913

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Frolov, S.M., Aksenov, V.S., Gusev, P.A., Ivanov, V.S., Medvedev, S.N., Shamshin, I.O.: Experimental proof of the energy efficiency of the Zel’dovich thermodynamic cycle. Dokl. Phys. Chem. 459(2), 207–211 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0012501614120057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wolanski, P.: Detonative propulsion. Proc. Combust. Inst. 34(1), 125–158 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2012.10.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lu, F.K., Braun, E.M.: Rotating detonation wave propulsion: experimental challenges, modeling, and engine concepts. J. Propuls. Power 30(5), 1125–1142 (2014). https://doi.org/10.2514/1.B34802

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Anand, V., Gutmark, E.: Rotating detonation combustors and their similarities to rocket instabilities. Progress Energy Combust. Sci. 73, 182–234 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2019.04.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bykovskii, F.A., Zhdan, S.A., Vedemikov, E.F.: Continuous spin detonations. J. Propul. Power 22(6), 1204–1216 (2006). https://doi.org/10.2514/1.17656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. St. George, A., Driscoll, R., Anand, V., Gutmark, E.: On the existence and multiplicity of rotating detonations. Proc. Combust. Inst. 36(2), 2691–2698 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2016.06.132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Rankin, B.A., Kaemming, T.A., Theuerkauf, S.W., Schauer, F.R.: Overview of performance, application, and analysis of rotating detonation engine technologies. J. Propul. Power 33(1), 131–143 (2017). https://doi.org/10.2514/1.B36303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fujii, J., Kumazawa, Y., Matsuo, A., Nakagami, S., Matsuoka, K., Kasahara, J.: Numerical investigation on detonation velocity in rotating detonation engine chamber. Proc. Combust. Inst. 36(2), 2665–2672 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2016.06.155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Liu, M., Zhou, R., Wang, J.P.: Numerical investigation of different injection patterns in rotating detonation engines. Combust. Sci. Technol. 187(3), 343–361 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/00102202.2014.923411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Nakagami, S., Matsuoka, K., Kasahara, J., Kumazawa, Y., Fujii, J., Matsuo, A., Funaki, I.: Experimental visualization of the structure of rotating detonation waves in a disk-shaped combustor. J. Propuls. Power 33(1), 80–88 (2017). https://doi.org/10.2514/1.B36084

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Anand, V., St. George, A., Driscoll, R., Gutmark, E.: Characterization of instabilities in a rotating detonation combustor. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 40, 16649–16659 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.09.046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Deng, L., Ma, H., Xu, C., Zhou, C., Liu, X.: Investigation on the propagation process of rotating detonation wave. Acta Astronaut. 139, 278–287 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2017.07.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Anand, V., St. George, A., Driscoll, R., Gutmark, E.: Investigation of rotating detonation combustor operation with H2–Air mixtures. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 41, 1281–1292 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.11.041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bedick, C., Ferguson, D., Strakey, P.: Characterization of rotating detonation engine injector response using laser-induced fluorescence. J. Propuls. Power 35(4), 827–838 (2019). https://doi.org/10.2514/1.B37309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bigler, B.R., Bennewitz, J.W.: Injector alignment study for variable mixing in rotating detonation rocket engines. AIAA Scitech 2019 Forum, San Diego, CA, AIAA Paper 2019-2019 (2019). https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2019-2019

  18. Duvall, J., Chacon, F., Harvey, C., Gamba, M.: Study of the effects of various injection geometries on the operation of a rotating detonation engine. AIAA SciTech 2018 Forum, Kissimmee, FL, AIAA Paper 2018-0631 (2018). https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2018-0631

  19. Anderson, J.D.: Modern Compressible Flow: With Historical Perspective, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, Boston (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Goto, K., Nishimura, J., Kawasaki, A., Matsuoka, K., Kasahara, J., Matsuo, A., Funaki, I., Nakata, D., Uchiumi, M., Higashino, K.: Propulsive performance and heating environment of rotating detonation engine with various nozzles. J. Propuls. Power 35(1), 213–223 (2019). https://doi.org/10.2514/1.B37196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gordon, S., McBride, B.J.: Computer Program for Calculation Complex Chemical Equilibrium Compositions and Applications—I. Users Manual and Program Description. NASA Reference Publication 1311 (1996)

  22. Saad, M.A.: Compressible-Fluid Flow, pp. 87, 93. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1985)

Download references

Acknowledgements

The present rotating detonation engine development was subsidized by the “Study on Innovative Detonation Propulsion Mechanism” Research-and-Development Grant Program (Engineering) of the Institute of Space and Astronautical Science of the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency and the “Research and Development of an Ultra-High-Thermal-Efficiency Rotating Detonation Engine with Self-Compression Mechanism” Advanced Research Program for Energy and Environmental Technologies of the New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization. The fundamental device development was subsidized by Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (A), No. 24246137. The test piece and test chamber were manufactured by Yasuda Koki Co., Ltd., Mizutani Seiki Co., Ltd., and Nakamura Construction Co., Ltd. Funding was provided by Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (Grant Nos. JP19H05464, JP18KK0127, JP17H03480, JP17K18937), Institute of Space and Astronautical Science.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Kasahara.

Additional information

Communicated by E. Gutmark.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Goto, K., Yokoo, R., Kawasaki, A. et al. Investigation into the effective injector area of a rotating detonation engine with impact of backflow. Shock Waves 31, 753–762 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00193-021-00998-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00193-021-00998-9

Keywords

Navigation