Skip to main content
Log in

Repeatability of Barley Seedling Reaction to Spot Blotch and Common Root Rot

  • Physiology
  • Published:
Cereal Research Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The inherent precision of spot blotch (SB) and common root rot (CRR) screening procedure through repeatability analysis was evaluated in seedling plants of three barley genotypes (Thibaut, WI2291 and AECS 76). High repeatability of assessments obtained by partitioning of variance components (69.0 to 86.0) for BS and (75.0 to 85.0) for CRR. On the basis of the variance component estimate, gain in precision was calculated using Falconer method. The results show that a moderate increase of precision (~ 2% for SB and ~ 4% for CRR) may be acquired through repeating the screening a second time for both diseases. Attained information from this study suggests that seedling screening of both SB and CRR under controlled conditions provides consistent information on host response, and reliable host reaction information could be obtained through a less number of repeated evaluations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anonymous, 1988. STAT-ITCF, Programme, MICROSTA, realized by ECOSOFT, 2nd Ver. Institut Technique des Cereals et des Fourrages Paris, pp.55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arabi, M. I. E.,and Jawhar, M. 1999. A rapid technique for determining common root rot reaction in barley. Plant Breeding 118:278–280.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Arabi, M. I. E. and Jawhar, M. 2002. Virulence spectrum to barley Hordeum vulgare L.) in some isolates of Cochliobolus sativus from Syria. J. Plant Pathol. 84: 35–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arabi, M. E. I. and Jawhar, M. 2003. Pathotypes of Cochliobolus sativus (spot blotch) on barley in Syria. J. Plant Pathol. 85(3), 193–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arabi, M. I. E., Sarrafi, A., Barrault, G. and Albertin, L. 1991. The influence of parental genotype and period of pollination on haploid barley production in Hordeum vulgare × H. bulbosum L. crosses. Cereal Res. Comm. 4:405–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, K. L., Knott, D. R. and Harding, H. 1988. Heritability and inheritance of resistance to common root rot (Cochliobolus sativus) in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Can. J. Plant Pathol. 10: 207–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, W. A. 1984. Manual of quantitative genetics. 4th Ed. Academic Enterprises, Pullman, W.A.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conner, R. L. 1990. Interrelationship of cultivar reactions to common root rot, black point, and spot blotch in spring wheat. Plant Dis. 74:224–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falconer, D. S. 1981. Introduction to quantitative genetics. 2nd Ed. Longman Inc., New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fetch, T. C. and Steffenson, B. J. 1994. Identification of Cochliobolus sativus isolates expressing differential virulence on two-row barley genotypes from North Dakota. Can. J. Plant Pathol. 16:202–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fetch, T. C. and Steffenson B. J. 1999. Rating scales for assessing infection responses of barley infected with Cochliobolus sativus. Plant Dis. 83: 231–1217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hetzler, J., Eyal Z., Metha, Y. R., Campos, L. A., Fehrmann, H., Kushnir, U., Zekaria, J. O. and Cohen, L., 1990. Interaction between spot blotch Cochliobolus sativus) and wheat cultivars. A proceeding of the International conference. Mexico, DF (Mexico). CIMMYT. 146–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kokko, E. G., Conner, R. L., Kozub, G. C. and Lee, B. 1993. Quantification by image analysis of subcrown internodes discoloration in wheat caused by common root rot. Phytopathology 83: 976–981.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kutcher, H. R., Bailey, K. L. Rossmagel, B. G. and Legge, W. C. 1994. Heritability of common root rot and spot blotch resistance in barley. Can. J. Plant Pathol. 16: 287–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathre, D. E. 1990. Compendium of Barley Disease (second edition). Montana State University. Bozeman, Montana. The American Phytopathologie Society, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA pp. 90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meldrum, S. M., Ogle, H. J. and Platz, G. J. 2000. Pathotypes of Bipolaris sorokiniana on barley in Australia. Proceedings of the 9th Australian Barley Technical Symposium, Melbourne, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nutter, F. W. Jr., Gleason, M. L. Jenco, J. H. and Christians, N. C. 1993. Assessing the accuracy, intra-rater repeatability, and inter-rater reliability of disease assessment systems. Phytopathology 83: 806–812.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steffenson, B. J., Hayes, P. M. and Kleinhofs, A., 1996. Genetics of seedling and adult plant resistance to net blotch (Pyernophora teres f. teres) and spot blotch (Cochliobolus stivus) in barley. Theor. Appl. Genet. 92: 552–558.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Van Leur, J. G., Alamdar, M. Z. and Khawatmi, S. 1997. Effect of Cochliobolus sativus on yields of barley under experimental conditions in northern Syria. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 48: 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zadoks, J. G, Chang, T. T. and Konzak, C. F. 1974. A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed Research 14:415–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, X., Haley, S. D. and Jin, Y. 2002. Repeatability of assays for seedling septoria tritici blotch resistance in winter wheat. Cereal Res. Comm. 30:157–163.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. I. E. Arabi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Arabi, M.I.E., Jawhar, M. Repeatability of Barley Seedling Reaction to Spot Blotch and Common Root Rot. CEREAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS 32, 249–253 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03543306

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03543306

Keywords

Navigation