Skip to main content
Log in

Form of ownership and risk taking in banking: Some evidence from Massachusetts savings banks

  • Published:
Journal of Economics and Finance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In recent years there has been interest in the impact of the form of ownership on the behavior of financial institutions. In the 1980’s, there was a substantial movement away from mutual ownership to stock ownership in the thrift industry. The effect of this conversion process on risk taking and efficiency has been a matter of concern. The purpose of this paper is to examine the experience of savings banks in Massachusetts. A panel of 115 savings banks is analyzed for the years 1985 through 1993, a period that includes both rapid growth and a subsequent severe cyclical decline in property values. The credit quality of loan portfolios is related to the size of the portfolio, the structure of the portfolio, and the ownership status of the bank. Several models are estimated. In all cases, it was found that the cyclical decline in property values resulted in a decline in the credit quality of loan portfolios with a substantially greater impact on those savings banks that converted from mutual to stock status.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altunbas, Y.; P. Molyneux; and N.B. Murphy, “Ownership and Efficiency in Banking, Stock vs. Mutual vs. Public Ownership: The Case of Italy,” Working Paper, Institute of European Finance, University of Wales, Bangor, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blair, D.W., and Placone, D.L., 1988, “Expense Preference Behavior, Agency Costs, and Firm Organization: The Savings and Loan Industry,”Journal of Economics and Business 40, 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, R.B. and Stover, R.D., 1990, “The Effects of Mutual to Stock Conversions of Thrift Institutions on Managerial Behavior,”Journal of Financial Services Research 4, 127–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cebenoyan, A.S.; E.S. Cooperman; C.A. Register; and S.C. Hudgins. 1993. “The Relative Efficiency of Stock versus Mutual S&L’s: A Stochastic Cost Frontier Approach.”Journal of Financial Services Research 7, 151–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cordell, L.R., MacDonald, G.D. and Wohar, M.E., 1993. “Corporate Ownership and the Thrift Crisis.”Journal of Law and Economics (October).

  • Eccles, J.L. and O’Keefe, J.P., 1994. “Understanding the Experience of Converted New England Savings Banks.”F.D.I.C. Banking Review Winter Vol. 8.

  • Edwards, F., 1977. “Managerial Objectives in Regulated Industries: Expense-Preference Behavior in Banking,”Journal of Political Economy 85, 147–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.Statistics on Banking: A Statistical Profile of the United States Banking Industry, 1993. (Washington, D.C.: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fields, J.A., 1988, “Expense Preference Behavior in Mutual Life Insurers.”Journal of Financial Services Research 1, 113–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, T.H., 1979, “Expense Preference Behavior in Banking: A Reexamination,”Journal of Political Economy 87, 891–895.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, T.H. and Mavinga, F., 1980, “Expense Preference and Managerial Control: The Case of the Banking Firm,”The Bell Journal of Economics 11, 671–682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M.C. and Meckling, W.H., 1976, “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior Agency Costs and Ownership Structure.”Journal of Financial Economics 3, 305–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masulis, R., 1987, “Changes in Ownership Structure: Conversions of Mutual Savings and Loans to Stock Charter,”Journal of Financial Economics 18, 29–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayers, D., and Smith C., 1986, “Ownership Structure and Control: The Mutualization of Stock Life Insurance Companies,”Journal of Financial Economics 16, 73–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mester, L.J., 1989, “Testing for Expense Preference Behavior: Mutual versus Stock Savings and Loans,”RAND Journal of Economics 20 (Winter), 483–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mester, L.J., 1993, “Efficiency in the Savings and Loan Industry,”Journal of Banking and Finance 17, 267–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simons, K., 1992, “Mutual-to-Stock Conversions by New England Savings Banks: Where Has All the Money Gone,” Federal Reserve Bank of Boston,New England Economic Review (March/April).

  • Verbrugge, J.A. and Goldstein, S.J., 1981, “Risk Return and Managerial Objectives: Some Evidence from the Savings and Loan Industry,”Journal of Financial Research 4, 45–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verbrugge, J.A. and Jahera, J.S., 1981, “Expense-Preference Behavior in the Savings and Loan Industry,”Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 13 (November), 475–476.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Murphy, N.B., Salandro, D. Form of ownership and risk taking in banking: Some evidence from Massachusetts savings banks. J Econ Finance 21, 19–28 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02929035

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02929035

Keywords

Navigation