Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

TaqMan real-time PCR versus four conventional PCR assays for detection of apple proliferation phytoplasma

  • Commentary
  • Published:
Plant Molecular Biology Reporter Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A recently developed TaqMan real-time PCR assay for detection of apple proliferation phytoplasma was evaluated in comparison to four conventional PCR-based methods with the aim to assess its potential for research and routine applications. All five protocols were tested in parallel on the same DNA isolates obtained from orchard trees. The performance of the methods was evaluated by means of sensitivity, specificity, susceptibility to inhibition, handling effort, testing time, assay expenses, and potential risk for operator and environment. Compared to the conventional PCR methods, the TaqMan real-time PCR procedure combined the highest test sensitivity with the highest test specificity and was, above all, not susceptible to PCR inhibition. Furthermore, TaqMan real-time PCR had the simplest and fastest testing process, involving a minimum of handling steps. Its disadvantage is the high cost of consumables and reagents, exceeding that of a standard PCR procedure up to four-fold. However, the higher material costs could be compensated by considerably lower personnel costs and by saving expenses for hazardous waste disposal. Due to the simple testing procedure and the output of results as numeric data the TaqMan real-time PCR assay has a high potential for automation, and seems to represent the currently most suitable method for large-scale testing procedures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

AP:

apple proliferation

NK:

negative control

NTC:

no-template control

PK:

positive control

References

  • Ahrens U and Seemüller E (1992) Detection of DNA of plant pathogenic mycoplasmalike organisms by a polymerase chain reaction that amplifies a sequence of the 16S rRNA gene. Phytopathology 82: 828–832.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baric S and Dalla Via J (2004) A new approach to apple proliferation detection: a highly sensitive real-time PCR assay. J Microbiol Meth 57: 135–145.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baric S and Dalla Via J (2005) Diagnostics of apple proliferation phytoplasma hampered by bacterial DNAs. Laimburg Journal 2: 27–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brzin J, Ermacora P, Osler R, Loi N, Ravnikar M and Petrovic N (2003) Detection of apple proliferation phytoplasma by ELISA and PCR in growing and dormant apple trees. J Plant Dis Prot 110: 476–483.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carraro L, Ermacora P, Loi N and Osler R (2004) The recovery phenomenon in apple proliferation-infected apple trees. J Plant Path 86: 141–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deng S and Hiruki C (1991) Amplification of 16S rRNA genes from culturable and nonculturable Mollicutes. J Microbiol Meth 14: 53–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • EPPO (2004) EPPO Standards. EPPO A1 and A2 Lists of pests recommended for regulation as quarantine pests. PM 1/2(13). European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization. Paris, France. Online Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Errea P, Aguelo V and Hormaza JI (2002) Seasonal variations in detection and transmission of pear decline phytoplasma. J Phytopathol 150: 439–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frisinghelli C, Delaiti L, Grando MS, Forti D and Vindimian ME (2000)Cacopsylla costalis (Flor 1861), as a vector of apple proliferation in Trentino. J Phytopathol 148: 425–431.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Green MJ, Thompson DA and MacKenzie DJ (1999) Easy and efficient DNA extraction from woody plants for the detection of phytoplasmas by polymerase chain reaction. Plant Dis 83: 482–485.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gundersen DE and Lee IM (1996) Ultrasensitive detection of phytoplasmas by nested-PCR assays using two universal primer pairs. Phytopathol Mediter 35: 144–151.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich M, Botti S, Caprara L, Arthofer W, Strommer S, Hanzer V, Katinger H, Bertaccini A and Laimer da Câmara Machado M (2001) Improved detection methods for fruit tree phytoplasmas. Plant Mol Biol Rep 19: 169–179.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hollomon D (2003) Applying modern diagnostics to plant disease control. Ann Rev Plant Path 2: 287–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarausch W, Saillard C, Dosba F and Bove JM (1994) Differentiation of mycoplasmalike organisms (MLOs) in European fruit trees by PCR using specific primers derived from the sequence of a chromosomal fragment of the apple proliferation MLO. Appl. Environ Microbiol 60: 2916–2923.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jarausch W, Saillard C, Helliot B, Garnier M and Dosba F (2000) Genetic variability of apple proliferation phytoplasmas as determined by PCR-RFLP and sequencing of a non-ribosomal fragment. Mol Cell Probes 14: 17–24.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Langrell SRH and Barbara DJ (2001) Magnetic capture hybridisation for improved PCR detection ofNectria galligena from lignified apple extracts. Plant Mol Biol Rep 19: 5–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lee IM, Hammond RW, Davis RE and Gundersen DE (1993) Universal amplification and analysis of pathogen 16S rDNA for classification and identification of mycoplasmalike organisms. Phytopathology 83: 834–842.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lee IM, Bertaccini A, Vibio M and Gundersen DE (1995) Detection of multiple phytoplasmas in perennial fruit trees with decline symptoms in Italy. Phytopathology 85: 728–735.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz KH, Schneider B, Ahrens U and Seemüller E (1995) Detection of the apple proliferation and pear decline phytoplasmas by PCR amplification of ribosomal and nonribosomal DNA. Phytopathology 85: 771–776.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mackay IM (2004) Real-time PCR in the microbiology laboratory. Clin Microbiol Infect 10: 190–212.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mackay IM, Arden KE and Nitsche A (2002) Real-time PCR in virology. Nucleic Acids Res 30: 1292–1305.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maixner M, Ahrens U and Seemüller E (1995) Detection of the German grapevine yellows (Vergilbungskrankheit) MLO in grapevine, alternative hosts and a vector by a specific PCR procedure. Eur J Plant Path 101: 241–250.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Musetti R, Favali MA and Pressacco L (2000) Histopathology and polyphenol content in plants infected by phytoplasmas. Cytobios 102: 133–147.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • NAPPO (2004) NAPPO Regional Standards for Phytosanitary Measures (RSPM). RSPM No. 25. Guidelines for international movement of pome and stone fruit trees into a NAPPO member country. Part I: Viruses and virus-like pests, viroids, phytoplasmas andXylella fastidiosa. North American Plant Protection Organization. Ottawa, Canada, Online Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poggi Pollini C, Giunchedi L and Bissani R (1997) Immunoenzymatic detection of PCR products for the identification of phytoplasmas in plants. J Phytopathol 145: 371–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poggi Pollini C, Giunchedi L, Bissani R and Firrao G (1999) Differentiation of apple proliferation and pear decline phytoplasma by oligonucleotide probing in an ELISA-PCR assay. URL: http://www.uniud.it/phytoplasma/conf.html. Proceedings of the First Internet Conference on Phytopathogenic Mollicutes.

  • Schaad NW and Frederick RD (2002) Real-time PCR and its application for rapid plant disease diagnostics. Can J Plant Path 24: 250–258.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Seemüller E, Schaper U and Zimbelmann F (1984) Seasonal variation in the colonization patterns of mycoplasmalike organisms associated with apple proliferation and pear decline. J Plant Dis Prot 91: 371–382

    Google Scholar 

  • Seemüller E, Kison H and Lorenz KH (1998a) On the geographic distribution and prevalence of the apple proliferation phytoplasma in low-intensity orchards in Germany. J Plant Dis Prot 105: 404–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seemüller E, Kison H, Lorenz KH, Schneider B, Marcone C, Smart CD and Kirkpatrick B (1998b) Detection and identification of fruit tree phytoplasmas by PCR amplification of ribosomal and nonribosomal DNA. In: Manceau C and Spak J (eds), COST 823: New technologies to improve phytodiagnosis. Advances in the detection of plant pathogens by polymerase chain reaction, pp 56–66. Office of the Official Publication of the European Community, Luxembourg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seemüller E, Garnier M and Schneider B (2002) Mycoplasmas of plants and insects. In: Razin S and Herrmann R (eds), Molecular Biology and Pathogenicity of Mycoplasmas, pp 91–115, Kluver Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Smart CD, Schneider B, Blomquist CL, Guerra LJ, Harrison NA, Ahrens U, Lorenz KH, Seemüller E and Kirkpatrick BC (1996) Phytoplasma-specific PCR primers based on sequences of the 16S-23S rRNA spacer region. Appl Environ Microbiol 62: 2988–2993.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tedeschi R and Alma A (2004) Transmission of apple proliferation phytoplasma byCacopsylla melanoneura (Homoptera: Psyllidae). J Econ Entom 97: 8–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Waterworth HE and Mock R (1999) An assessment of nested PCR to detect phytoplasmas in imported dormant buds and internodal tissues of quarantined tree fruit germ plasm. Plant Dis 83: 1047–1050.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry Laimburg, I-39040, Auer/Ora (BZ), Italy

    S. Baric, C. Kerschbamer & J. Dalla Via

Authors
  1. S. Baric
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. C. Kerschbamer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. J. Dalla Via
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Baric.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Baric, S., Kerschbamer, C. & Via, J.D. TaqMan real-time PCR versus four conventional PCR assays for detection of apple proliferation phytoplasma. Plant Mol Biol Rep 24, 169–184 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02914056

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02914056

Key words

Search

Navigation