Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Recent developments in fungicides: Spray materials

  • Published:
The Botanical Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Literature Cited

  1. Adams, J. F. Some recent results in spraying apples. Trans. Penin. Hort. Soc.20: 98–110. 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  2. —. Fungicide No. 66. Del. State Board Agr. Bull.25: 40–45. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  3. —. Sulphur fungicides. Del. State Board Agr. Bull.25: 48–54. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  4. —. A new copper fungicide. Del. State Board Agr. Bull.25: 73–80. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Anderson, H. W. Results of disease control in 1932. Trans. Ill. State Hort. Soc.56 (1932): 175–200. 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Anonymous. Vegetable oils as spreaders for bordeaux mixture. Mysore Coffee Expt. Sta. Cir. 2. 3 pp. 1934.

  7. Austin, M. D. andMartin, H. The incorporation of contact insecticides with protective fungicides. Potato field trials 1930–32. Jour. South-E. Agric. Coll., Wye, Kent.,32: 49–58. 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ballard, W. S. andVolck, W. H. Apple powdery mildew and its control in the Pajaro Valley. U. S. Dept. Agr. Bull. 120. 26 pp. 1914.

  9. Barker, B. P. T. Investigations on the fungicidal action of sulphur. IV. Third Progress Report. Ann. Rept. Agr. & Hort. Res. Sta. Univ. Bristol1929: 130–148. 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Blodgett, F. M., Mader, E. O., Burke, O. D., andMcCormack, R. B. Total amount of copper applied and ratio of lime to copper in bordeaux as important factors in potato spraying. Abs. in Phytopath.23: 5. 1933.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Branas, J. andDulac, J. Sur le mode d’action des bouillies cupriques au moment de leur emploi. Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci.197: 938–941. 1933.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. ——. Sur le mode d’action des bouillies cupriques. Rôle de la dessiccation. Prog. Agric. et Vitic.100: 642–644. 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  13. ——. Sur le mode d’action des bouillies cupriques. Ann. Ec. Agric. Montpellier N. S.23: 104–114. 1934.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. ——. Le traitement du mildiou de la vigne par les bouillies cupriques. Compt. Rend. Acad. Agr. France20: 33–39. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  15. ——. Nouvelle contribution à l’étude du mode d’action des bouillies cupriques. Compt. Rend. Acad. Agr. France20: 500–505. 1934.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. ——. Sur quelques effets des produits ajoutés aux bouillies cupriques. Rev. Path. Veg.22: 13–18. 1935.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Boutaric, A., Doladilhe, M. andPiettre, M. Sur l’emploi des matiéres colorantes comme agents anticryptogamiques, dans les maladies des végétaux. Compt. Rend. Acad. Agri. France 18: 819–824. 1932.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Brenchley, W. E. The essential nature of certain minor elements for plant nutrition. Bot. Rev.2: 173–196. 1936.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Burrell, A. B. andParker, R. G. Field trials with lime-sulphur and Koppers flotation sulphur in apple-scab control. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 1932,29: 98–102. 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Byers, H. G. Selenium occurrence in certain soils in the United States, with a discussion of related topics. U. S. Dept. Agr. Tech Bull.482. 47 pp., 1935.

  21. Delage, B. The solubility of copper in anticryptogamic products and and its importance. Chim. et Indus. (Special No.)27: 853–858. 1932. [Abstract in Chem. Abs.26: 3608–3609. 1932.]

    Google Scholar 

  22. Del Guidice, E. Alcune esperienze sull ‘azione anticrittogamica dello solfo. Bol. R. Staz. Pat. Veg. N. S.11: 128–137. 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  23. DeLong, W. A. andPickett, A. D. On a possible effect of fungicides upon the composition of apples. Science N. S.73: 649–650. 1931.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. DeOng, E. R. Fungicidal values of pine-tar oil and copper resinate. Phytopath.22: 861–864. 1932.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Desrue A. Les mouillants en agriculture. Rev. Vitic.78: 405–411. 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  26. —. Bouillies mouillantes et mouillants. Progr. Agr. Vitic.104: 228-231, 257–262. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Dulac, J. Utilisation des propriétés du sulfure de cuivre. Compt. Rend. Acad. Agr. France20: 650–652. 1934.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. —. Étude des conditions de la meilleure efficacité d’une bouillie anticryptogamique au sulfure de cuivre. Progr. Agr. Vitic.103: 345–348. 1935.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Dutton, W. C. Spray injury studies. I. Injuries from summer applications on apples. Mich. Agr. Exp. Sta. Spec. Bull.218: 1–68. 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  30. —. Control of apple scab. 62d Ann. Rept. (1932) Mich. State Hort. Soc.5: 54–57. 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Fonzes-Diacon. Rôle physique et chimique des rayons ultra-violets sur le soufre sublimé. Action du soufre sur l’Oïdium. Progr. Agr. et Vitic.95: 155–158. 1931.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Goldsworthy, M. C. The fungicidal action of liquid lime-sulphur. Phytopath.18: 355–360. 1928.

    Google Scholar 

  33. — andGreen, E. L. Some promising fungicides. Phytopath.23: 561–562. 1933.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. ——. Availability of copper in bordeaux mixture residues and its absorption by conidia of Sclerotinia fructicola. Jour. Agr. Res.52: 517–533. 1936.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Goodwin, W., Martin, H., andSalmon, E. S. Polysulphide sulphur in relation to the fungicidal efficiency of certain spray materials. Ann. Appl. Biol.17: 127–136. 1930.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Hamilton, J. M. Studies of the fungicidal action of certain dusts and sprays in the control of apple scab. Phytopath.21: 445–523. 1931.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. —. Studies on apple scab and spray materials for its control in the Hudson Valley. N. Y. State Agr. Exp. Sta. Tech. Bull.227: 3–56. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Henderson, R. G. Promising fungicides for tobacco downy mildew control. Abs. in Phytopath.26: 94. 1936.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Hockenyos, G. L. Solubility of bordeaux. Phytopath.21: 231–234. 1931.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. —, andIrwin, G. R. Studies on bordeaux deposition. Phytopath.22: 857–860. 1932.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Hockey, J. F. Cooperative investigation of fungicides for apple orchards. Rept. Dominion Botanist for 1930. Div. Bot., Canada Dept. Agri., p. 106.

  42. —, andWard, R. W. Studies in apple storage. I. The influence of fungicides on flavour and sugar content. Sci. Agr. 12: 709–715. 1932.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Hoffman, M. B. The effect of certain spray materials on the carbon dioxide assimilation by McIntosh apple leaves. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci., 1932.29: 389–393. 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  44. —. Carbon dioxide assimilation by apple leaves as affected by lime-sulphur sprays. II. Field experiments. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 1933.30: 169–175. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Holland, E. B., Dunbar, C. O., Gilligan, G. M., andDoran, W. L. The preparation and effectiveness of basic copper sulphate as a fungicide. Mass. Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull.254: 124–149. 1929.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Hurt, R. H. The prevention of arsenical injury to peach twigs and foliage in Virginia. Phytopath.21: 1204. 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  47. -. The waste sulphite material of paper mills as an adjuvant to certain spray materials. Va. Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 277. 10 pp. 1931.

  48. Kadow, K. J., andAnderson, H. W. The rôle of zinc sulphate in peach sprays. Ill. Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull.414: 207–255. 1935.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Kearns, H. G. H., Marsh, R. W., andMartin, H. Combined washes. Progress report. Rept. Agric. & Hort. Res. Sta. Bristol1934: 109–125. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Kelsall, A. The iron-sulphate and lime-sulphur mixture as a spray. Can. Chem. Metall.19: 239. 1935.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. —,Hockey, J. F., andWalter, G. P. Experiments with new spray mixtures. Ann. Rept. Pom. & Fruit Grow. Soc. Quebec 36: 26–37. 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Liming, O. N. The relation of pentathionic acid and its component constituents to the toxicity of sulphur fungicides. Phytopath.22: 143–165. 1932.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. —. The preparation and properties of pentathionic acid and its salts; its toxicity to fungi, bacteria, and insects. Phytopath.23: 155–174. 1933.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Magie, R. O., andHorsfall, J. G. Relative adherence of cuprous oxide and other copper fungicides. Abs. in Phytopath.26: 100–101. 1936.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Manns, T. F., andAdams, J. F. Department of plant pathology. Ann. Rept. Del. Agr. Exp. Sta. for 1932 (Bull. 179)8: 43–55. 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Manzoni, L. Prove con l’anticrittogamico ‘Italia.’ Reprint from Ann. Staz. Sper. Vitic. Conegliano3 (2): 10 pp. 1930.

  57. Marsh, R. W. Investigations of the fungicidal action of sulphur. III. Studies on the toxicity of sulphuretted hydrogen and on the interaction of sulphur with fungi. Jour. Pomol. & Hort. Sci. 7: 237–250. 1929.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Martin, H. The hydrolysis of sulphur in relation to its fungicidal activity. Jour. Agr. Sci.20: 32–44. 1930.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. —. The present uses and future development of spray spreaders. Hort. Educ. Assoc. Yearbook1: 76–84. 1932.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. —. Studies upon the copper fungicides. II. Some modifications of bordeaux mixture designed to overcome practical difficulties in its application. Ann. Appl. Biol.20: 342–363. 1933.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. —, andSalmon, E. S. The fungicidal properties of certain spray fluids. VIII. The fungicidal properties of mineral, tar, and vegetable oils. Jour. Agr. Sci.21: 638–658. 1931.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. ——. The fungicidal properties of certain spray fluids. XI. Synthetic solvents. Jour. Agr. Sci.24: 469–490. 1934.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. ——, andWare, W. M.. Spraying experiments against pear scab. Jour. South E. Agr. Coll. Wye, Kent34: 145–154. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Martin, W. H. Plant pathology. 53rd and 54th Annual Reports. First Bienn. Rept.) N. J. Agr. Exp. Sta.2: 57–66. 1933.

  65. McCallan, S. E. A. Studies on fungicides. III. The solvent action of spore excretions and other agencies on protective copper fungicides. Cornell Agr. Exp. Sta. Mem.128: 25–79. 1930.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. —, andWilcoxon, F. The fungicidal action of sulphur. II. The production of hydrogen sulphide by sulphured leaves and spores and its toxicity to spores. Contr. Boyce Thompson Inst.3: 13–38. 1931.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. ——. Fungicidal action and the periodic system of the elements. Contr. Boyce Thompson Inst.6: 479–500. 1934.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. ——. The action of fungous spores on bordeaux mixture. Abs. in Phytopath.26: 101–102. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Menzel, K. C. Untersuchungen der schädigenden Wirkungen kupferhaltizer Spritzmittel. Angew. Bot.17: 225–253. 1935.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Meyer, A. Sur l’emploi des colorants et de diverses substances organiques dans la lutte contre les maladies cryptogamiques, en particulier le mildiou de la vigne. Rev. Vitic.76: 197–202. 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Muskett, A. E., andTurner, E. The control of American gooseberry mildew in northern Ireland. Part II. Jour. Min. Agr. Northern Ireland3: 83–96. 1931.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Nelson, E. M., Hurd-Karrer, A. M., andRobinson, W. O. Selenium as an insecticide. Science n. s.78: 124. 1933.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Osterwalder, A. Schorfbekämpfungsversuche mit Schwefelkalkbrühe und verschiedenen Zusätzen. Schweiz. Zeits. für Obst.- und Weinbau36: 446–454. 1928.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Pallier, A. La résine colloïdale comme mouillant et fixatif. Rev. Vitic.76: 92–94. 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Pastac, I. Constitution of organic dyestuffs and their anticryptogamic action. Chim. et Indus. (Special No.)27: 851–861. 1932 (French). Abs. in Chem. Abs.26: 3608. 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Poole, R. F. Arsenical injury on the peach. N. C. Exp. Sta. Tech. Bull. 49. 13 pp. 1935.

  77. — Effects of some copper compounds on the control ofBacterium pruni and on the peach tree. Abs. in Phytopath.26: 105. 1936.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. Raleigh, W. P. A homemade colloidal copper spray. Abs. in Phytopath.23: 29. 1933.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  79. Ribereau-Gayon, J. Sur le mécanisme de l’action des composés cupriques contre le mildiou. Compt. Rend. Acad. Agr. France 19: 550–555. 1933.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. —. Sur le traitement du mildiou de la vigne par les bouillies cupriques. Compt. Rend. Acad. Agr. France20: 184–489. 1934.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. Roberts, J. W., andPierce, Leslie. Zinc-lime, a fungicide for the peach. Phytopath.22: 415–427. 1932.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  82. Roberts, J. W., Pierce, L., Smith, M. A., Dunegan, J. C., Green, E. L., andGoldsworthy, M. C.. Copper phosphate mixture: A promising fungicide. Abs. in Phytopath25: 32–33 1935.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. Robinson, R. H. Powdered Bordeaux mixture. Indus. & Eng. Chem.15: 941–942. 1923.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  84. —. Sprays, their preparation and use. Ore. Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull.259: 5–27. 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  85. Schneiderhan, F. J. Instant bordeaux. W. Va. Agr Exp. Sta. Cir. 60. 8 pp. 1932.

  86. Sempio, C. Meccanismo di azione dello zolfo mella lotta contro le Erisifacee. Ann. Tecnica Agrariå5: 4–60. 1932.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  87. Serveille, J. Encore l’alun. Progr. Agriç. & Vitic.98: 525–526. 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  88. Sessions, A. C. Fungicide adjustment. Indus. & Eng. Chem. 28: 287–290. 1936.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  89. Smith, M. A. The control of certain fruit diseases with flotation sulphurs. Phytopath.20: 535–553. 1930.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  90. Tisdale, L. E. Colloidal sulphur: preparation and toxicity. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard.12: 381–418. 1925.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  91. Waite, M. B. Fungicide as a term commonly used has three definitions. U. S. Dept. Agr. Yearbook1927: 341–342. 1928.

    Google Scholar 

  92. Whetzel, H. H. andMcCallan, S. E. A. Studies on fungicides. I. Concepts and terminology. Cornell Agr. Exp, Sta. Mem. 128: 3–7. 1930.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  93. Wilcoxon, F. andMcCallan, S. E. A. The fungicidal action of sulphur. I. The alleged rôle of pentathionic acid. Phytopath.20: 391–417. 1930.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  94. ——. The fungicidal action of sulphur. III. Physical factors affecting the efficiency of dusts. Contr. Boyce Thompson Inst.3: 509–528. 1931.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  95. ——. The fungicidale action of sulphur. IV. Comparative toxicity of sulphur, selenium, and tellurium. Contr. Boyce Thompson Inst.4: 415–424. 1932.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  96. ——. Fungicidal action of organic thiocyanates, resorcinol derivatives, and other organic compounds. Contr. Boyce Thompson Inst.7: 333–339. 1935.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  97. Wilson, J. D. andRunnels, H. A. Some effects of bordeaux mixture on transpiration. Bi-month. Bull. Ohio Agr. Exp. Sta.18: 147–151. 1933.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  98. ——. The relative influence of calcium and magnesium in bordeaux mixture on transpiration rate, II. Bi-month. Bull. Ohio Agr. Exp. Sta.19: 175–179. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  99. ——. Transpirational response of various plants to bordeaux mixture, Ohio Agr. Exp. Sta. Bi-month. Bull.19: 198–202. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  100. ——. The relation of time to the effect of bordeaux mixture on transpiration. Ohio Agr. Exp. Sta. Bi-month. Bull. 20: 120–124. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  101. Young, H. C. The sulphur sprays. Proc. Ohio State Hort. Soc.1924: 85–91. 1924.

    Google Scholar 

  102. —, andBeckenbach, J. R. Insoluble copper compounds as substitutes for bordeaux. Abs. in Phytopath.25: 40. 1935.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Bureau of Plant Industry, U. S. Department of Agriculture, USA

    John W. Roberts

Authors
  1. John W. Roberts
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Roberts, J.W. Recent developments in fungicides: Spray materials. Bot. Rev 2, 586–600 (1936). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02868930

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02868930

Keywords

Search

Navigation