Skip to main content
Log in

Shear behavior of overconsolidated Nakdong river sandy silt

  • Geotechnical Engineering
  • Published:
KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this research, overconsolidated drained, undraned and unconsolidated undrained of Kakdong river sandy silt in triaxial compression tests were performed on specimens of silt with 26% sand content. In CIU and CID tests, the specimens were consolidated isotropically from 100 to 400 kPa and unloaded to 200 kPa for OCR-2, unloaded to 100 kPa for OCR=4 and unloaded to 50 kPa for OCR=8 before shear condition. In UU test, the samples were carried out under effective confining pressure 100 to 400 kPa during shear. In CIU-OC tests, the flowing characteristics were observed: the deviator stress decreased with higher OCRs and showed strain-softening behavior after failure. Pore water pressure decreased to negative; that the samples were higher dilative volume change tendency under unloading due to increasing OCRs. CID-OC tests indicated that the deviator stresses increased and presented strain-softening tendency after failure. Became negative due to dilatancy with higher OCRs under small strains. In UU tests, peak deviator stresses were different and displayed strain-softening tendency under higher effective confining pressure after peak value. The pore water pressures increased with small strains before failure and depended on saturation condition at failure. The undrained shear strength and the internal friction angle in UU test cannot be determined accurately due to dilative effect and low-cohesion of sandy silt. By using the concepts of critical state, the stress paths showed similar and all failure points followed to a unique slope line which forms a critical state line (CSL) in stress path diagram.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anandarajah, A.. (2000). “Triaxial behavior of kaolinite in different pore fluids.”J. Geotech. Eng., ASCE, Vol. 126, No. 2, pp. 148–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boukpeti, N.. (2000). “Triaxial behavior of refined Superior sand model.”Computer and Geotechnics J., Vol. 26, pp. 65–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandon, T. L. and Andrew, T. R.. (2006). “Drained and undrained strength interpretation for low-Plasticity silts.”J. Geotech. Engrg. ASCE, Vol. 132, No. 2, pp. 250–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, L. N. and Duncan, J. M.. (1990). “Stress-deformation characteristics of an Alaskan silt.”J. Geotech. Eng. ASCE, Vol. 116, No. 3, pp. 377–393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoeg, K., Dyvik, R. and Sandbxkken, G.. (2000). “Strength of undisturbed versus reconstituted silt and silty sand specimens.”J. Geotech. Eng., ASCE, Vol. 126, No. 7, pp. 606–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horpibulsuk, S.. (2004). “Undrained shear behavior of cement admixed clay at high water content.” Vol. 130, No. 10, pp. 1096–1105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katti, D. R.. (2003). “Undrained response of clays to varying strain rate.”J. Geotech. Eng., ASCE, Vol. 129, No. 3, pp. 278–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kokusho, T.. (2004). “Undrained shear strength of granular soils with different particle gradations.”J. Geotech. Eng. ASCE, Vol. 130, No. 6, pp. 621–629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J.-H. and Salgado, R.. (2004). “Stiffness degradation and shear strength of silty sands.”Can. Geotech. J., Vol. 4, pp. 831–843.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lo, S. R. and Wardani, S. P. R.. (2002). “Strength and dilatancy of a silt stabilization by a cement and fly ash mixture.”Can. Geotech. J., Vol. 39, pp. 77–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahardjo, H.. (2004). “Shear strength of a compacted residual soil from consolidated drained and constant water content triaxial tests.”Can. Geotech. J., Vol. 41, pp. 421–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salgado, R.. (2000). “Shear strength and stiffness of silty sand.”J. Geotech. Eng., ASCE, Vol. 126, No. 5, pp. 451–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, S.. (2003). “Effect of silt on three-dimensional stress-strain behavior of loose sand.”J. Geotech. Engrg., ASCE, Vol. 129, No. 1, pp. 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sitharam, T. G. and L. Govinda, R.. (2004). “Cyclic and monotonic undrained shear response of silty sand from Bhuj region in India.”ISET. Journal of Earthquake Technology, No. 450, Vol. 41, No. 2-4, pp. 249–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamamuro, J. A. and Kelly, M. C.. (2001). “Monotonic and cyclic liquefaction of very loose sands with high silt content.”J. Geotech. Eng., ASCE, Vol. 127, No. 4, pp. 314–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yilmaz, M. T.. (2004). “Undrained cyclic shear and deformation behavior of silt-clay mixtures of Adapazari, Turkey.”Soil dynamics and Earthquake Eng., Vol. 24, pp. 497–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Khin Swe Tint.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tint, K.S., Kim, Y.S., Seo, IS. et al. Shear behavior of overconsolidated Nakdong river sandy silt. KSCE J Civ Eng 11, 233–241 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02824087

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02824087

Keywords

Navigation