Skip to main content
Log in

Preschoolers' reasons for accepting peers with and without disabilities

  • Published:
Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Little is known about preschoolers' reasons for wanting or not wanting to interact with age peers with disabilities. This question was examined in two studies using different methods. In Study 1, preschoolers ranked their preferences and provided reasons for wanting to play with one of three Playmobil figures presented with scripts representing a typically developing child, one with an orthopedic impairment, and one with cognitive impairment. In Study 2, while viewing photographs, preschoolers explained their reasons for playmate preferences for classmates with and without disabilities. Results from Study 1 indicated that preschoolers preferred to play with and made more positive comments about the typical child than the other two. Findings for Study 2 showed that preschoolers made more liking comments about same gender typical children. Females made disliking comments about males with and without disabilities, whom they considered aggressive. Males made disliking comments about males with disabilities whom they perceived as aggressive. Results from these two studies suggest that views of preschool classmates with disabilities may not always be positive; therefore, interventions, such as cooperative activities, may be necessary to enhance the positive effects of inclusion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acton, H. M., and Zarbatany, L. (1988). Interaction and performance within cooperative groups: Effects on nonhandicapped students' attitudes toward their mildly mentally retarded peers.Am. J. Ment. Retard. 93: 16–23.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Asher, S. R., and Hymel, S. (1981). Children's social competence in peer relations: Sociometric and behavioral assessment. In J. D. Wine and M. D. Smye (eds),Social competence, Guilford, New York, pp. 125–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asher, S. R., Singleton, L. C., Tinsley, B. R., and Hymel, S. (1979). A reliable sociometric measure for preschool children.Dev. Psychol. 15:443–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asher, S. R., and Taylor, A. R. (1981). Social outcomes of mainstreaming: Sociometric assessment and beyond.Except. Ed. Quart. 1: 13–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bredekamp, S. (1987).Developmentally Appropriate Practice, National Association for the Education of Young Children, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell-Dolan, D., and Wessler, A. E. (1994). Ethical administration of sociometric measures: Procedures in use and suggestions for improvement.Profess. Psychol. Res. Pract. 25: 23–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavallaro, S. A., and Porter, R. H. (1980). Peer preferences of At-Risk and normally developing children with a preschool mainstream classroom.Am. J. Ment. Def. 84: 357–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, R., Nabors, L. A., Pierce, K. (1994). Preschoolers' evaluations of physical disabilities: A consideration of attitudes and behavior.J. Pediatr. Psychol. 19: 103–111.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Coie, J. D., Dodge, K. A., and Coppotelli, H. (1982). Dimensions and types of social status: A cross-age perspective.Devel. Psychol. 18: 557–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conant, S., and Budoff, M. (1983). Patterns of awareness in children's understanding of disability.Ment. Retard. 21: 119–125.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Das, R., and Berndt, T. J. (1992). Relations of preschoolers' social acceptance to peer ratings and self-perceptions.Early Ed. Devel. 3: 221–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeGrella, L. H., and Green, V. P. (1984). Young children's attitudes toward orthopedic and sensory disabilities.Ed. Vis. Hand. 16: 3–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, K. E. (1993). Preschool children's concepts of disability in their peers.Early Ed. Devel. 4: 123–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, K. E. (1994). Evaluating preschool children's sensitivity to developmental differences in their peers.Top. Early Child. Special Ed. 14: 49–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dittmer, R. M. (1991).The effects of simulation activities on the attitudes of preschoolers without handicaps and their peers with handicaps (Report No. PS019-699), Department of Education, Washington, DC; Special Education Programs. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 346 953).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fassler, J. (1975).Howie Helps Himself, Albert Whitman, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleiss, J. L. (1981).Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furman, W., and Bierman, K. L. (1983). Developmental changes in young children's conceptions of friendship.Child Devel. 54: 549–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerber, P. J. (1977). Awareness of handicapping conditions and sociometric status in an integrated preschool setting.Ment. Retard. 15: 24–25.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Guralnick, M. J., and Groom, J. M. (1987). The peer relations of mildly delayed and nonhandicapped preschool children in mainstreamed play groups.Child Devel. 58: 1556–1572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, D. S. (1978). Cognitive bases for liking and disliking among preschool children.Child Devel. 49: 906–909.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, D. S., Gershman, E., and Bolin, L. J. (1980). Friends and enemies: Cognitive bases for preschool children's unilateral and reciprocal relationships.Child Devel. 51: 1276–1279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, R. L., and Sisk, D. A. (1967). Early perceptions of orthopedic disability.Except. Child. 34: 42–43.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, R. L., and Sisk, D. A. (1970). Early perceptions of orthopedic disability: A developmental study.Rehab. Lit. 31: 34–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemple, K. M. (1991). Preschool children's peer acceptance and social interaction.Young Child. 46: 47–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladd, G. W., and Coleman, C. C. (1993). Young children's peer relationships: Forms, features, and functions. In B. Spodek (ed.),Handbook of Research on the Education of Young Children, MacMillan, New York, pp. 57–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladd, G. W., and Mars, K. T. (1986). Reliability and validity of preschoolers' perceptions of peer behavior.J. Clin. Child Psychol. 15: 16–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lasker, J. (1974).He's My Brother, Albert Whitman, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masters, J. C., and Furman, W. (1981) Popularity, individual friendship selections, and specific peer interaction among children.Devel. Psychol. 17: 344–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McConnell, N. P. (1988).Different and Alike, Current, Colorado Springs, CO.

  • Mize, J., and Ladd, G. W. (1988). Predicting preschoolers' peer behavior and status from their interpersonal strategies: A comparison of verbal and enactive responses to hypothetical social dilemmas.Devel. Psychol. 24: 782–788.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mott, S., Striefel, S., and Quintero, M. (1987).Preparing Regular Classroom Students for Mainstreaming: A Literature Review (Report No. C008401757), Department of Education, Washington, DC.; Special Education Programs (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 290295).

    Google Scholar 

  • Musun-Miller L. (1990). Sociometrics with preschool children: Agreement between different strategies.J. Appl. Devel. Psychol. 11: 195–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nabors, L. A. (1993). [Preschoolers' attitudes during play in an integrated setting], Unpublished raw data.

  • Nabors, L. A., and Morgan, S. B. (1993). Preschool children's verbal responses and attitudes toward an adult with an orthopedic handicap.J. Devel. Phys. Dis. 5: 217–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Association of Early Childhood Specialists in State Departments of Education NAECE/SDE (1991). Guidelines for appropriate curriculum content and assessment in programs serving children ages 3 through 8.Young Child. 46: 21–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quay, L. C., and Jarrett, O. S. (1984). Predictors of social acceptance in preschool children.Devel. Psychol. 20(5): 793–796.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raab, M., Nordquist, V. M., Cunningham, J. L., and Bliem, C. D. (1986). Promoting peer regard of an autistic child in a mainstreamed preschool using pre-enrollment activities.Child Study J. 16: 265–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rule, S., Stowitschek, J. J., Innocenti, M., Striefel, S., Killoran, J., and Swezey, K. (1987). The social integration program: An analysis of the effects of mainstreaming handicapped children into day care centers.Ed. Treat. Child. 10: 175–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey, P. G. (1991). The salience of race in young children growing up in an all white community.J. Ed. Psychol. 83: 28–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey, P. G., and Meyers, L. C. (1990). Salience of race in young children's cognitive, affective, and behavioral responses to social environments.J. Appl. Devel. Psychol. 11: 49–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siperstein, G. N., Bak, J. J., and O'Keefe, P. (1988). Relationship between children's attitudes toward and their social acceptance of mentally retarded peers.Am. J. Ment. Retard. 93: 24–27.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weinberg, N. (1978). Preschool children's perceptions of orthopedic disability.Rehab. Counsel. Bull. 21: 327–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weidman, C. S., and Strayhorn, J. M. (1992). Relationships between children's prosocial behaviors and choices in story dilemmas.J. Psychoed. Assess. 10: 330–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nabors, L., Keyes, L. Preschoolers' reasons for accepting peers with and without disabilities. J Dev Phys Disabil 7, 335–355 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02578435

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02578435

Key Words

Navigation