Abstract
The model elaborated here provides a common language for analyzing and understanding the literature on formative evaluation by identifying four components: who participates, what roles can be taken, what techniques can be used, and in what situations these can occur. Premised on the design process, intentional decisions about these components must be made after establishing goals of the instruction and considering the constraints. The model was validated by analyzing 11 instructional design texts. The analysis revealed many assumptions embedded in the language that is used to talk about formative evaluation and highlighted what is emphasized and what is not addressed about the process. The model provides a decision-making template for designing an effective formative evaluation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andrews, D. H., & Goodson, L. A. (1980). A comparative analysis of models of instructional design.Journal of Instructional Development, 3(4), 2–16.
Baker, E. L., & Alkin, M. C. (1973). Formative evaluation of instructional development.Audiovisual Communication Review, 21(4), 389–418.
Banathy, B. H. (1987). Instructional systems design. In R. M. Gagné (Ed.),Instructional technology: Foundations, (pp. 85–112). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Bordonaro, T. (1993).A comparison of the effectiveness, cost and efficiency of four formative evaluation conditions. Unpublished master's thesis, McGill University, Montreal.
Briggs, L. J. (1970).Handbook of procedures for the design of instruction. Pittsburgh, PA: American Institutes for Research.
Briggs, L. J., & Wager, W. W. (1981).Handbook of procedures for the design of instruction (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technologies Publications.
Cambre, M.A. (1981). Historical overview of formative evaluation of instructional media products.Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 29(1), 3–25.
Carroll, M. J. (1988).Toward optimizing learner feedback during instructional materials development: Exploring a methodology for the analysis of verbal data. Unpublished master's thesis, McGill University.
Cronbach, L. J. (1963). Course improvement through evaluation.Teacher College Record, 64, 672–683.
Davidove, E. A., & Reiser, R. A. (1991). Comparative acceptability and effectiveness of teacher-revised and designer-revised instruction.Educational Technology Research and Development, 39(2), 29–38.
Dick, W., & Carey, L. (1990).The systematic design of instruction. (3rd ed.). Glenview, IL.: Scott, Foresman & Company.
Dupont, D., & Stolovitch, H. D. (1983). The effects of a systematic revision model on revisers in terms of student outcomes.Performance and Instruction, 22(2), 33–37.
Duy, N. (1990).Revision of instructional materials: Uniformity among four revisers and their attention to learner data. Unpublished master's thesis, McGill University, Montreal.
Flagg, B. N. (1990).Formative evaluation for educational technologies. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Gagne, R. M., Briggs, L. J., & Wager, W. W. (1992).Principles of instructional design. (4th ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Geis, G. L., & Weston, C. (1989).Update on formative evaluation: Approaches and techniques. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Society for Performance and Instruction, Denver, CO.
Golas, K. C. (1983). Formative evaluation effectiveness and cost.Performance and Instruction Journal, 22(5), 17–19.
Gropper, G. L. (1975).Diagnosis and revision in the development of instructional materials. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational technology.
Gustafson, K. L. (1981).Survey of instructional development models. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Printing Services. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 211-097).
Israeloff, A. (1992).Comparison of feedback generated by experts and learners during formative evaluation. Unpublished master's thesis, McGill University, Montreal.
Kandaswamy, S. (1980). Evaluation of instructional materials: A synthesis of models and methods.Educational Technology, 20(6), 19–26.
Kandaswamy, S., Stolovitch, H., & Thiagarajan, S. (1976). Learner verification and revision: An experimental comparison of two methods.Audiovisual Communication Review, 24(3), 316–328.
Kemp, J. E., Morrison, G. R., & Ross, S. M. (1994).Designing effective instruction. New York, NY: Macmillan College Publishing Company.
Kirkpatrick, D.L. (1987). Evaluation. In R.L. Craig (Ed.),Training and development handbook (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Komoski, P. K., & Woodward, A. (1985). The continuing need for learner verification and revision of textual material. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.),The technology of text: Vol. 2 (pp. 396–417). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational, Technology.
Lawson, T. E. (1974).Formative instructional product evaluation: Instruments and strategies. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
Le Maistre, K. (1994).The priorities established among data sources when instructional designers revise written materials. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, McGill University, Montreal.
Markle, S. M. (1978).Designs for instructional designers. Champaign, IL: Stipes Publishing Company.
McAlpine, L. (1987). The think aloud protocol: A description of its use in the formative evaluation of learning materials.Performance and Instruction Journal, 26(8), 18–21.
McAlpine, L. (1992). Highlighting formative evaluation: An instructional design model derived from practice.Performance and Instruction Journal, 31(10), 16–18.
McAlpine, L., & Weston, C. (1994). The attributes of instructional materials.Performance Improvement Quarterly, 7(1), 19–30.
Medley-Mark, V., & Weston, C. (1988). A comparison of student feedback obtained from three methods of formative evaluation of instructional materials.Instructional Science, 17, 3–27.
Nathenson, M. B., & Henderson, E. S. (1980).Using student feedback to improve learning materials. London, U.K.: Croom Helm Ltd.
Popham, W. J., & Baker, E. L. (1970). Systematic instruction. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall Inc.
Rahilly, T. J. (1991).An analysis of three learner based formative evaluation conditions. Unpublished master's thesis, McGill University, Montreal.
Reigeluth, C. M. (1983). Instructional design: What is it and why is it. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.)Instructional-design theories and models: An overview of their current status, (pp. 3–36). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Romiszowski, A. J. (1981).Designing instructional systems. London, UK: Kogan Page.
Rowland, G. (1993). Designing and instructional design.Educational Technology Research and Development, 41(1), 79–91.
Scriven, M. (1967). The methodology of evaluation. In Tyler, R.W. et al.Perspectives of curriculum evaluation. (AREA monograph series on curriculum evaluation, no. 1), 39–83. Chicago: Rand McNally.
Simon, H. A. (1969).The sciences of the artificial. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.
Tessmer, M. (1993).Planning and conducting formative evaluations. London, UK: Kogan Page.
Thiagarajan, S. (1978). Instructional product verification and revision: 20 questions and 200 speculations.Educational Communications and Technology Journal, 26(2), 133–141.
Tremblay, D. (1994).Defining characteristics of feedback generated by subject matter experts and learner specialists during formative evaluation. Unpublished master's thesis, McGill University, Montreal.
Wager, J. C. (1983). One-to-one and small group formative evaluation: An examination of two basic formative evaluation procedures.Performance and Instruction Journal, 22(5), 5–7.
Weston, C. (1987). The importance of involving experts and learners in formative evaluation.Canadian Journal of Educational Communication, 16(1), 45–58.
Weston, C. (1991a).Separating data collection from revision: A framework for conducting formative evaluation research. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
Weston, C. (1991b).Formative evaluation as an instructional strategy. Paper presented at the Canadian Society for the Study of Higher Education, Quebec City, Canada.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
They are also members of the Centre for University Teaching and Learning of which Cynthia is Director. The authors wish to thank Jacob Burack, the reviewers and the editor for the insightful formative feedback that was provided on various drafts of this manuscript.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Weston, C., McAlpine, L. & Bordonaro, T. A model for understanding formative evaluation in instructional design. ETR&D 43, 29–48 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02300454
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02300454