Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of applied potassium on nutrient contents of rice grown in three soils

  • Short Communications
  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Out of various soil and plant test methods tested for predicting response of rice to K application in soils of a rice growing valley region the Hanway and Heidal extractant neutralN NH4 OAc turned out to be the best. The critical limit of extractable K was 160 ppm by the Hanway and Heidal extractant, and by the Bray's reagent 175 ppm. Critical K level in the rice plant is 0.4%. Correlations between the extractable K and K uptake were highly positive for various extractants: Hanway and Heidal, Morgan, Hunter and Pratt No. 2, Blanchet and Perigand and MacLean. Although majority of the soils of the region was Inceptisols followed by Alfisols and Vertisols, all soil types had a similar available nutrient status and a similar pattern in relative grain yields. K response was noticeable in Alfisols with respect to grain and straw yields. The grain P concentration in Vertisols, and straw K in Alfisols indicated the contribution of K towards the productivity of two soil groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Arora B R and Kanwar J S 1969 J. Res. (P.A.U.) 6, 325–330.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Association of Official Agricultural Chemists, Washington D.C. Twelfth Edition, 1970.

  3. Bansal K Net al. Plant and Soil, 70, 133–140.

  4. Blanchet R and Perigaud S 1960 Annls. Agron. 11, 347.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Branner W 1978 in Soils and Rice IRRI Los Banos, Laguna, Philippines, pp 35–55.

  6. Bray R H 1948 H B Kitchen (ed.) Diagnostic Techniques for soils and crops, Amer. Potash Inst.

  7. Cate R B Jr. and Nelson A L 1965 Tech. Bull. Int. Soil Testing 1.

  8. Dyer B 1894 J. Chem. Soc. 65, 115.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hanway J J and Heidal H 1952 Iowa, Agron. 57.

  10. Hunter A H and Pratt P F 1957 Proc. Soil Sci. Soc. Am., 21, 595.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jaworski C A and Barber S R 1959 Soil Sci. 87, 37–41.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Johnson C M and Ulrich A 1959 Calif. Agric. Exp. Sta. Bull. 766.

  13. Kanwar J S 1974 Proceedings of the 10th Congress of the International Potash Institute, Budapest.

  14. MacLean A J 1961 Can. J. Soil Sci. 41, 196–206.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mishra B, Tripathi B R and Chauhan R P S 1970 J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci., 18, 21–26.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Morgan M F 1951 Bull. Conn. Agric. Exp. Sta., 450.

  17. Oh W K 1979 Nitrogen and Rice IRRI Los Banos, Laguna, Philippines, pp 435–439.

  18. Parte J Ket al. 1971 J. Korean Soc. Soil Sci., Ferti. 4, 27–32.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Reitemeir R F 1951 Soil Potassium, Adv. Agron., 3, 113–164.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Stevenson F J 1966In Soil Biochemistry, Eds. A D McLarea and G H Petersen, Dekker N.Y. p 169.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Yamane I and Okazaki M 1982In Vertisols and Rice Soils of the Tropics, 12th Internatl. Cong. Soil Sci., New Delhi, pp 143–157.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bansal, K.N., Bhadoria, U.P.S. & Dube, J.N. Effect of applied potassium on nutrient contents of rice grown in three soils. Plant Soil 84, 275–278 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02143190

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02143190

Key words

Navigation