Skip to main content
Log in

Computed tomography, ultrasonography, and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the diagnosis of pancreatic disease: A comparative study

  • Published:
Gastrointestinal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A prospective study was performed comparing the sensitivity of computed tomography, ultrasonography, and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in the diagnosis of pancreatic disease. Forty patients with suspected pancreatic carcinoma, acute recurrent or chronic pancreatitis, and/ or jaundice were studied. CT was the most sensitive study in evaluation of pancreatitis. ERCP was most accurate in evaluation of pancreatic malignancy. Ultrasonography was the least sensitive method in detecting pancreatic disease and dilatation of the extrahepatic biliary ducts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cutler SJ, Myers MH, Green SB: Trends in survival rates of patients with cancer.N Engl J Med 293:122–124, 1975

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. McCormack LR, Seat SG, Strum WB: Pancreatic carcinoma: survival following detection by ultrasound scanning.JAMA 238:240, 1970

    Google Scholar 

  3. Husband JE, Meire HB, Kreel L: Comparison of ultrasound and computer assisted tomography in pancreatic diagnosis.Br J Radiol 50:855–862, 1977

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Haaga JR, Alfidi RG, Havrilla TR, et al: Definitive role of CT scanning of the pancreas.Radiology 124:723–730, 1977

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rohrmann CA, Silvis SE, Venness JA: Evaluation of the endoscopic pancreatogram.Radiology 113:297–304, 1974

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Doust BD: Ultrasonic examination of the pancreas.Rad Clin North Am 13 (3): 467–478, 1975

    Google Scholar 

  7. Stanley RJ, Sagel SS, Levitt RG: Computed tomographic evaluation of the pancreas.Radiology 124:715–722, 1977

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gosink BB, Leopold GR: The dilated pancreatic duct: Ultrasonic evaluation.Radiology 126:475–478, 1978

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lawson TL: Sensitivity of pancreatic ultrasonography in the detection of pancreatic disease.Radiology 128:733–736, 1978

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ferrucci JT, Wittenberg J, Black EB, Kirkpatrick RH, Hall DA: Computed body tomography in chronic pancreatitis.Radiology 130:175–194

  11. Dimagno EP, Malagelada JR, Taylor WF, et al: A prospective comparison of current diagnostic tests for pancreatic cancer.N Engl J Med 297:737–741, 1977

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Robinson A, Scott J, Rosenfeld BD: The occurrence of carcinoma of the pancreas in chronic pancreatitis.Radiology 94:289–290, 1970

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Foley, W.D., Stewart, E.T., Lawson, T.L. et al. Computed tomography, ultrasonography, and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the diagnosis of pancreatic disease: A comparative study. Gastrointest Radiol 5, 29–35 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01888596

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01888596

Key words

Navigation